Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
My guess would be about the same time that they find WMD's in Iraq....just a guess now!
Simply fucking wow!
- Thread starter Canceled2
- Start date
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
OMFG!!! I just fell out of my chair laughing!!!
Silly you, have you ever met an intellectually honest dildo?
Of course not, but one can hope~~~
No, he's quite right. You're loony as a jay-bird. Oh....and flattery will get you no where with Stringy!
Yeah Mott, you have certainly made quite the point~~~
You gave your usual apoligist opinions. You did not address the points other than with opinion. You also failed to deal with any of the supportive citations provided in the commentary.
Circumstanially the paper provided enough supportive information to show Rauf is inter-connected. Circumstanial proofs can support conclusions and I believe they do in this circumstance.
You are an apologist asshole...go figure.
concise, to the point, truthful, yet eloquent.
Well said sir!
FINALLY..!
You constructed two semi sentences with no spelling errors!
Silly you, have you ever met an intellectually honest dildo?
If you would take it out of your mouth, I might be able to hear you articulate better.
I'll wait and you tell me when you're ready, k?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Stringfield, summarizing in a dismissive tone is not a refutation.
They are all highly salient and meaningful connections to terrorism.
They are all highly salient and meaningful connections to terrorism.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Certainly not! You'd have no use for us men then!!!
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Grumph! Freaken spellin Nazis!
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Mmmpphh, grrrphe gurgle mmmphh!
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
These connections surely cast a black pall over the entire concept of Islam itself.
christiefan915
Catalyst
christiefan915
Catalyst
The "points" are underwhelming. They are nothing but guilt by association and where there is any connection it is second hand. Read the citations, for what to find out what his gardener's barber's nephew did?
I score this post 9.9 out of ten, on the Richter scale of Faux Outrage.
FOX news is not supporting the financial banks of the ME, as Bloomberg is. FOX news is opening up an alternative media headed up by a progressive outspoken anti terrorist journalist (that's good for the ME). 7% holdings is squat influence since they are all Class A non-voting shares.
The point of the post was how unbelievable it is that such a wealthy individual with conflicts of interest such as Bloomberg has, can be taken seriously when he talks about the Mosque!
More stringy opinions touted as facts...by him of course~~~
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
This is the case with all our "leaders". They are liars, thieves, and sellout-artists.
When you can weild influence it is imperative that your conflict of interests, if they can be shown to exist, should be not only valid for inquiry, but expected inquiry.