Simple solutions to school shootings

Taichiliberal said:
Parroting your revisionist claptrap won't make it any less false. As the links I provided in the previous post demonstrated, law enforcement officers federal and local recognize the the gun show loophole. No one really gives a damn what you want to believe. It's been demonstrated and logically explained...So you're just pissing in the wind or circle jerking with like minded oather/threeper wtf you call yourselves buddies to say other wise. FACTS over beliefs....deal with it toodles.
Click to expand...

Have you gone to a gun show and purchased a firearm?
Just askin'
 
Teflon Don said:
When the topic is anything but global warming he goes full on Deshtard
Click to expand...
Lol.
f21724119c88b60f93d08f4d4a0cf08a.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Taichiliberal said:
Parroting your revisionist claptrap won't make it any less false. As the links I provided in the previous post demonstrated, law enforcement officers federal and local recognize the the gun show loophole. No one really gives a damn what you want to believe. It's been demonstrated and logically explained...So you're just pissing in the wind or circle jerking with like minded oather/threeper wtf you call yourselves buddies to say other wise. FACTS over beliefs....deal with it toodles.
Click to expand...

What gun show loophole? There is no such thing.
 
RB 60 said:
Have you gone to a gun show and purchased a firearm?
Just askin'
Click to expand...

He confuses loophole with someone doing under the law what he doesn't agree with.

In my State, as a private seller, I can sell at the gun shows. There are two things I have to ask. One, is the person a resident of the State and two, is there any reason under State law that he/she can't own a gun. Most will show me their CWP which proves both.

That's not a loophole, that's following a law that Taichi wouldn't approve of. By definition, a loophole is something that is so ambiguous in it's writing that the intent of what is written can be evaded without violating the law. My State's laws aren't ambiguous. They are very objective when it comes to residency, inability to own, and age.
 
iewitness said:
sir, you advocate oathkeeping and patriotism. a I would ask of thee why have the agents not done their damned job?
Click to expand...
because they were trained to believe that officer safety is paramount, above everything else. They do this with the approval of the courts as well as most of the people. they have zero reason to risk their lives because they are ultimately not liable for any injuries or deaths caused by their negligence.

iewitness said:
and why have you, as an oathkeeper not killed them ? sorry. that may be a question to avoid. you have the right to remain silent and bend over.
Click to expand...

what a stupid fucking troll question.
 
kudzu said:
You think you could fight the Army, National Guard and State police?
Click to expand...

I alone? of course not, don't be such a dumbass. But even if every single military member and law enforcement agent were to organize against the people, they'd lose because you'd have 80 million gun owning Americans against 6 million government agents.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Parroting your revisionist claptrap won't make it any less false. As the links I provided in the previous post demonstrated, law enforcement officers federal and local recognize the the gun show loophole. No one really gives a damn what you want to believe. It's been demonstrated and logically explained...So you're just pissing in the wind or circle jerking with like minded oather/threeper wtf you call yourselves buddies to say other wise. FACTS over beliefs....deal with it toodles.
Click to expand...

it's BULLSHIT. If there is something that is PURPOSEFULLY written in to a law, it's not a loophole. end of the fucking story. YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I alone? of course not, don't be such a dumbass. But even if every single military member and law enforcement agent were to organize against the people, they'd lose because you'd have 80 million gun owning Americans against 6 million government agents.
Click to expand...

Most of the aforementioned, along with their friends and families are gun owners themselves. Think about it.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
are you saying that the family and friends of law enforcement and military would join if they were ordered to persecute citizens?
Click to expand...

No, I'm saying the military and law enforcement both own and have family and friends who are gun owners. They won't be shooting at them, nor, according to those I've spoken to in person or on military websites, will follow an order to. In other words, they ain't gonna shoot their own.
I hope that clears things up.
 
RB 60 said:
No, I'm saying the military and law enforcement have family and friends who are gun owners. They won't be shooting at them, nor, according to those I've spoken to in person or on military websites, will follow an order to. In other words, they ain't gonna shoot their own.
I hope that clears things up.
Click to expand...

This why China uses troops from different parts of China, to deal with unrest in another part.
 
CFM said:
He confuses loophole with someone doing under the law what he doesn't agree with.

In my State, as a private seller, I can sell at the gun shows. There are two things I have to ask. One, is the person a resident of the State and two, is there any reason under State law that he/she can't own a gun. Most will show me their CWP which proves both.

That's not a loophole, that's following a law that Taichi wouldn't approve of. By definition, a loophole is something that is so ambiguous in it's writing that the intent of what is written can be evaded without violating the law. My State's laws aren't ambiguous. They are very objective when it comes to residency, inability to own, and age.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that is a loop hole. No background checks and they walk with a weapon if they have the money. It is a way to sell more while checking less.
 
RB 60 said:
No, I'm saying the military and law enforcement both own and have family and friends who are gun owners. They won't be shooting at them, nor, according to those I've spoken to in person or on military websites, will follow an order to. In other words, they ain't gonna shoot their own.
I hope that clears things up.
Click to expand...

thanks. needed your confirmation, however, I do believe that at least half would follow orders to assault citizens for gun confiscation.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
because they were trained to believe that officer safety is paramount, above everything else. They do this with the approval of the courts as well as most of the people. they have zero reason to risk their lives because they are ultimately not liable for any injuries or deaths caused by their negligence.



what a stupid fucking troll question.
Click to expand...

yes. fail on me. sorry. all systems have failed and no man can save us from the beast which is the us gov.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top