Should The Tea Party Abandon The GOP and form their own party?

Rune said:
Wow. Ann Coulter is right you fucking retard.
How old are you, 12?
Shut the fuck up you ignorant retard.
Click to expand...

This erupting from the leftist dunce who whines to me about civility. You really are a repugnant hypocrite dunce stuck on stupid aren't you?
 
Classic Liberal said:
You do mean all of those old avid BIG government Republican supporters of the Military Industrial ,Complex, the Nixon Drug War, anti-gay equal marriage rights, avid supporters of the American World Police Force, avid supporters of American foreign policy meddling and nation building and avid supporters of unnecessary, undeclared, unconstitutional wars that you’ve voted for all of your voting life, right Jerkoff?
Click to expand...

No you ignorant fool; but why would I attempt to explain what is meant to a brain dead vulgar asshoke stuck on stupid.

Run along; your naive and stupid duopoly meme is boring.
 
Classic Liberal said:
Hey Jerkoff, did you ever consider that Romney lost in spite of your vote because he’s a shining example of

What makes you think that any self-respecting Tea-Party voter would waste their vote like you did on the father of “Romney-Care/Obama-Care?” What makes you think a self-respecting Tea-Party voter couldn’t see through the flip-flopping bullshitting bastard Romney and recognize he was simply more of the same old “go along to get along” gutless, ball-less RINO bastards that already infest government that you vote for?
Click to expand...

I see that you're still stuck on stupid; why don't you and your butt buddy Rune have another moron circle jerk together? Now THAT is funny.
 
Jarod said:
Absolutely, why should two groups with such differing views be restricted by such association.

The problem would be that the TEA Party would then be forced to identify what it stands for and would stop being able to pretend to stand for all things to those who are angry about where we are as a nation.

The truth is that the TEA Party is not really a party, because they don't have a standard set of ideals, they simply are a label conservatives use to try to separate themselves from the candidates they have previously chosen to lead them. If you poll honest TEA party people, I imagine a huge majority supported GWB.
Click to expand...

Only a gullible, naive BIG Government twit can say the TEA party needs to identify what it stands for.

Another clueless Liberal fool who can't comprehend what "Taxed Enough Already" means.

But your feigned concern for Republicans and the Tea Party priceless.
 
Jarod said:
That's basically it. Such a move would be great for America. If the Republican party could rid itself of the misguided Conservative Christian science deniers... The world would be a better place.
Click to expand...

LMAO; yeah, because embracing clueless low information voters who elected the most inexperienced, economically clueless, naive, arrogant hyper partisan dunce in the history of the Presidency is an example of intelligence.
 
SmilinJack said:
Good analysis. There is much confusion in the Republican party amongst the differing factions that compose it. That is why they have lost the last two elections and will probably lose the next one....unless they wake up.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you need to study up on the history of Presidential elections? You're always on shaken intellectual ground when you agree with hyper partisan lefyist idiots like Jarod.

SmilinJack said:
Republicans are not as stupid as they appear....but like too many Americans these days(products of a public school education)they do not have the ability to think for themselves...relying on the media and their leadership to direct them.
Click to expand...

LMAO @ thinking for themselves. Well, if I have to choose between unthinking individuals, I would chose the ones who think Big Government and high taxes are the problem as being the more informed.
 
Right said:
Madness, yes. When he agrees with her, she's a reputable source. When he doesn't agree, she's a worthless POS. You however, are always a worthless POS. LMAO
Click to expand...

Remember who you're arguing with; a repugnant hyper partisan ignorant twit stuck on stupid and incapable of intelligent thought or comprehension. Particularly when it comes to irony and hypocrisy.
 
Jarod said:
Absolutely, why should two groups with such differing views be restricted by such association.

The problem would be that the TEA Party would then be forced to identify what it stands for and would stop being able to pretend to stand for all things to those who are angry about where we are as a nation.

The truth is that the TEA Party is not really a party, because they don't have a standard set of ideals, they simply are a label conservatives use to try to separate themselves from the candidates they have previously chosen to lead them. If you poll honest TEA party people, I imagine a huge majority supported GWB.
Click to expand...

I supported Bush but found him highly disappointing. There were signs but I chose to ignor them like most partisans do.

I won't make that mistake ever again. Which is why I didn't vote McCain or Romney
 
Teflon Don said:
I supported Bush but found him highly disappointing. There were signs but I chose to ignor them like most partisans do.

I won't make that mistake ever again. Which is why I didn't vote McCain or Romney
Click to expand...

In other words, you're fine when idiots like Obama win elections. ;)
 
Truth Detector said:
Remember who you're arguing with; a repugnant hyper partisan ignorant twit stuck on stupid and incapable of intelligent thought or comprehension. Particularly when it comes to irony and hypocrisy.
Click to expand...


On the contrary...quite a few of us find your extreme hypocrisy quite ironic.
 
Truth Detector said:
Remember who you're arguing with; a repugnant hyper partisan ignorant twit stuck on stupid and incapable of intelligent thought or comprehension. Particularly when it comes to irony and hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
I've long given up rational argument with the Putz. It's pure entertainment now.
 
Truth Detector said:
This erupting from the leftist dunce who whines to me about civility. You really are a repugnant hypocrite dunce stuck on stupid aren't you?
Click to expand...

You actually did improve somewhat, and, if the idiot Smiling Jackoff wasn't a rightie you would be just as rude to him, and you know damn well he is feeble minded.
 
Right said:
So you have selective agreement with her. LMAO.
Click to expand...

Shithead, unlike you, I don't think everyone on the "other side" is wrong about everything.

I disagree with Ann's general principles but she is right in this instance. I disagree with yours and Truth Deflectors yet I thank both of you sometimes. I agree with Classic Liberal, but I groan some of his posts too, and you also thank my posts sometimes and you know it. Even yurt, the epitome of hyper-partisanship gets and gives an occasional thanks. You don't have a point, so drop it, and furthermore you have never come close to besting me in any argument, you are truly delusional to think so.
 
Truth Detector said:
I see that you're still stuck on stupid; why don't you and your butt buddy Rune have another moron circle jerk together? Now THAT is funny.
Click to expand...

Gee! Great argument genius!!! Should we interpret that as just another of your clueless, senseless, non-responsive babblings?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top