Should the Senate call Eric Ciaramella to testify

Adolf_Twitler said:
First of all WITCH- No one said that this guy is even the whistle blower!

2ndly, you have no proof that anyone heard this man say anything about Trump- and most likely someone made this shit up- especially since the OP ED didn't even mention who heard him say what he has been accused of saying.

And 3rdly- YOUR SOURCE- "Real Clear Politics" has been found to be an extreme RIGHT WING Fake News source that has been fact checked many times and found to be a bunch of liars!

What a Witch!
Click to expand...

You're such a bullshitter, RCP is slightly to the right ffs. But no doubt you think that Raw Sewage, Think Progress and Alternet are totally trustworthy.
 
Getin the ring said:
nice try moonbat,

the fact that one of the house managers is lying under oath about his relationship with Eric spins a whole new light onto the proceedings, for those of us watching with open minds
Click to expand...

That wouldn’t just kill any chance of conviction.

It would open up a whole new investigation. Probably with a prosecutor. Another one. Schumer and the rest are *pretending* they want ALL witnesses.
 
CFM said:
What makes you think what he says is factual unless he has the guts to say it under oath?
Click to expand...

The transcript was released, and they admitted the transcript was moved to a different server.
 
CFM said:
Democrat claim to want witnesses. What they really want is those that will lie for their cause.
Click to expand...
Nah, allow witnesses for both sides and allow Roberts to rule on their relevancy. He would not allow whistleblower testimony. He wouldn’t allow question. Rand should be arrested.
 
Jarod said:
YOu have 0 integrity, and so say what you choose, you are a nonentity, not a person with any honor.
Click to expand...

Nancy said it is not an impeachment unless it it bipartisan.........Nancy as zero integrity, the impeachment is a non-entity and you wouldn't know what honor was if the Florida bar ethics board explained it to you in your letter of admonishment.......
 
Jarod said:
I have never once reniged on a bet.
Click to expand...

neither have I....but Nancy reneged on impeachment and only gave you an *impeachment........I didn't have a bet to leave the board for a NancyDance or a SchiffShow......by the way, learn how to spell reneged.......
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
How would that change any of the facts?

If there is a cop who has a passion for catching DUI drivers, does that change the fact that the driver blew over the limit?

If Ralph Nader hates corporate corruption, does it change the facts he exposes?

If the facts were in question you might have an argument, they aren’t.
Click to expand...
If the WB and Schiff conspired together some exculpatory details may have been omitted. We need to hear from them both.
 
Jarod said:
I have never once reniged on a bet.
Click to expand...

This is what I referenced:

Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
“YOu have 0 integrity, and so say what you choose, you are a nonentity, not a person with any honor.”

Pot, meet kettle.

Do you ipunderstsnd now?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
neither have I....but Nancy reneged on impeachment and only gave you an *impeachment........I didn't have a bet to leave the board for a NancyDance or a SchiffShow......by the way, learn how to spell reneged.......
Click to expand...

The “lawyer” doesn’t know how to spell?

Good grief.
 
Getin the ring said:
I think that would be a game changer

kind of put this whole image into perspective

https://www.realclearinvestigations...ing_with_ally_how_to_remove_trump_121701.html
Click to expand...

This is why a newly elected President should just clean house of any holdovers of the previous administration; especially when they are Party of the Jackass holdovers. That was Trump's greatest mistake due to his political naivete.

Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues. And both expressed anger over Trump’s new “America First” foreign policy, a sea change from President Obama’s approach to international affairs.
 
Jarod said:
How would that change any of the facts?
Click to expand...

What facts? This is a concocted HOAX using a lie filled narrative prolonged by a PHONY media no longer interested in journalism.

This Obama holdover wasn't a whistle blower. He was a PHONY used by Schiff to get at a President in a despicable attempt to overturn an election and change the predictable outcome of the 2020 election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top