Oh you're mistaken. I'm all for reasonable restrictions. We just disagree what is reasonable. So now,as to my question, you don't favor reasonable restrictions on parenting and birth?
Who applies the restrictions, the state? Just how does that work?
Oh you're mistaken. I'm all for reasonable restrictions. We just disagree what is reasonable. So now,as to my question, you don't favor reasonable restrictions on parenting and birth?
Christiekins loves Margaret Sangers' work with Planned Parenthood but doesn't want to apply her principles to planning any parenthood, apparently.
![]()
Margaret Sanger wasn't the government.
do people lose their right to decide for their kids once they are born?
Who applies the restrictions, the state? Just how does that work?
Then its done nothing to solve the problem. Much as DC has done nothing to solve the financial problems the federal government has by slightly lowering the massive increases in spending. Feel good acts are pointless.
Why of course the state. Like I think we can both agree that violent felons shouldn't have children. Or the mentally adjudicated. People convicted of domestic violence...

Why of course the state. Like I think we can both agree that violent felons shouldn't have children. Or the mentally adjudicated. People convicted of domestic violence...
Buck v. Bell was never overruled. Is it ethical? Who decides?
I believe you're taking the piss. Or maybe trying to tie reproductive rights to gun rights in some convoluted way.
Buck v. Bell was never overruled. Is it ethical? Who decides?
So I'm the only one who believes it's time for some COMMON SENSE restrictions on the right to parentage?
No, I'm being serious. Are you disagreeing with my premise?