Stop dodging Comrade.False
Just saw your article... Instructing those you are responsible to use any LEGAL method, is not illegal.
Stop dodging Comrade.False
Just saw your article... Instructing those you are responsible to use any LEGAL method, is not illegal.
Trump won the PresidencyNo, but they get to vote for those responsible for fixing it, so if that is not their priority or they put their faith in the wrong people, that is the way it works.
I must have misunderstood what you're asking. I'm not saying he's committed a crime. I'm saying that there are circumstances where the president can take unilateral action to deploy the National Guard within a state, regardless of whether or not he has the approval of the governor.Based on the article you shared, he has not committed that crime.
Narrow circumstancesI must have misunderstood what you're asking. I'm not saying he's committed a crime. I'm saying that there are circumstances where the president can take unilateral action to deploy the National Guard within a state, regardless of whether or not he has the approval of the governor.
Now, will the president come up with another fake emergency to rationalize deploying the National Guard in a state where the governor doesn't want it? That seems likely.
Yup, so he has limited powers.Trump won the Presidency
The powers are granted with a level of subjectivity. Trump has misused the spirit of rules so far, so I would expect him to missuse them again.Narrow circumstances
In the 1960s, federal troops were deployed to Alabama streets to protect civil rights marchers during the Selma to Montgomery marches in March 1965I know what Republicans would have said.
I’m interested in what Trump is now think?
I doubt there will be many answers.
But, but, but, but.In the 1960s, federal troops were deployed to Alabama streets to protect civil rights marchers during the Selma to Montgomery marches in March 1965
But that was OK
They did in LA.No, they shouldn't and, so far, none have policed any states.
He's violated the law but hasn't been held accountable by Congress. Not his first time either.The powers are granted with a level of subjectivity. Trump has misused the spirit of rules so far, so I would expect him to missuse them again.
Not really. The marines just stood around federal buildings to protect them. I don't see an issue with that.They did in LA.
Yup, so he has limited powers.
Misused in what way?The powers are granted with a level of subjectivity. Trump has misused the spirit of rules so far, so I would expect him to missuse them again.
Yes, limited to ONLY those given him by Article II, he does not seem to understand that.He has ALL the powers enumerated in Article II - no matter how much that distresses you.
You of the left seem to think that all executive powers transferred to the judiciary once Trump was sworn in.
By declaring imaginary emergencies to use Presidential powers to do whatever he wants.Misused in what way?
You grasp that the District of Columbia is a FEDERAL district and the POTUS has full authority to deploy the NG with no justification at all, right?By declaring imaginary emergencies to use Presidential powers to do whatever he wants.
Yes, limited to ONLY those given him by Article II, he does not seem to understand that.
"I’m interested in what Trump is now think?"I know what Republicans would have said.
I’m interested in what Trump is now think?
I doubt there will be many answers.
So where does Article II give the President the right to impose tariffs?All I see are insurrectionists on the Bench engaged in sedition attempting to block his Article II powers.