Shame on you, RINO Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
You have been dishonorably discharged for cowardice in the face of your own racist beliefs.


RINO Ron is doomed because of his failure to condemn the racist statements published under his name, and people like you are to blame.

New supporters, many of whom are first encountering libertarian ideas through the Ron Paul Revolution, deserve a far more frank explanation than the campaign has as yet provided of how their candidate's name ended up atop so many ugly words.

Ron Paul may not be a racist, but he became complicit in a strategy of pandering to racists--and taking "moral responsibility" for that now means more than just uttering the phrase.

It means openly grappling with his own past--acknowledging who said what, and why.

Otherwise he risks damaging not only his own reputation, but that of the philosophy to which he has committed his life.​
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ing-with-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/250206/
 
Quotes from Ron Paul newsletters:

"Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

"We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."

After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."

Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."
 
Some Ron Paul supporters seem to be racists, and RINO Ron blames America for 9/11.
 
raw video shows ron paul did not storm out

lamestream media lied??????

Reports that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul stormed out of a CNN interview earlier this week seem to be dramatically over-exaggerated.

Raw footage of the Thursday interview shows that it lasted nearly ten minutes, which is not unusually brief on the campaign trail.

Initial news reports made it seem that Mr Paul recited his one line response- that he didn't write the letters, that he didn't read them until about a decade after they were published, and that he disavows them- and stormed off, tossing away his microphone and charging out.

The newly-released CNN footage shows something entirely different.

After fielding repeated questions about the controversial newsletters, Mr Paul began wrapping up the interview.

The CNN reporter, Gloria Borger, didn't even seem particularly upset or surprised that the interview was ending considering the fact that she was beginning to repeat the same questions on the issue presumably in hopes of receiving a new answer.
Click to expand...

SHOCKED, i tell you, SHOCKED!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top