Shaffer: Trump Wiretap Case 'Worse Than Watergate'

TheDonald

Banned
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/...-wiretapping-case-worse-watergate-not-russian

Former CIA officer Col. Tony Shaffer said the basics of President Trump's claim to have been "wiretapped" are likely true, and that the incident is "worse than Watergate."

Noting it has been exactly two weeks since Trump tweeted that President Obama wiretapped his namesake tower, Shaffer said the "basic fundamental idea and claim is true."

He said that Trump was not physically wiretapped, with a wire into his phone, and it may not have physically been Trump Tower, but his campaign apparatus instead.

Shaffer said that due to the simplicity required to "mask" an American's name during an incidental wiretap, that the leak of Gen. Michael Flynn's name was "accidental on purpose."

"Clearly they were after gossip because it was political," Shaffer said, maintaining that the alleged wiretap had nothing to do with Russia.

The "political appointees" in the intelligence community knew exactly what they were surveilling for, Shaffer said, adding that the case is "much worse than Watergate by an order of magnitude."

He said that even if the surveillance was done legally, the "unmasking" of Americans' names and the leaking of the information are felones.

Shaffer added that Trump's references to battling the "intelligence community" likely meant those political appointees involved in the alleged surveillance, and not the CIA or NSA writ large.

And worse yet Rachel Madcow proved that Trump actually pays taxes
 
Shaffer added that Trump's references to battling the "intelligence community" likely meant those political appointees involved in the alleged surveillance, and not the CIA or NSA writ large.
agree. but Trump needs to learn
"everything you say will be held against you" it's TV politics/hostile LW press/and a politicized Deep State
combining up to tag team him
 
agree. but Trump needs to learn
"everything you say will be held against you" it's TV politics/hostile LW press/and a politicized Deep State
combining up to tag team him

Trump needs to learn nothing, the TV fake World of politics elected him, they are the ones that need to learn.

LOL
 
agree. but Trump needs to learn
"everything you say will be held against you" it's TV politics/hostile LW press/and a politicized Deep State
combining up to tag team him

This one hit him pretty good so maybe he'll finally learn lol.

Then again, the OP issue could turn out to be significant and I'm not sure it would have come out on its own.
 
This one hit him pretty good so maybe he'll finally learn lol.

Then again, the OP issue could turn out to be significant and I'm not sure it would have come out on its own.
excellent insight..
one thing positive from this mess is the exposure of the DeepState as a political force answerable to no one
 
Just like the Nunes thing last week.

A whole lotta nuthin'.

Well, Democrats have been pushing 'a whole lotta nuthin' for months lol.

I wouldn't be so sure something doesn't come out of it. An actual crime was committed, unlike the other instance.
 
Well, Democrats have been pushing 'a whole lotta nuthin' for months lol.

I wouldn't be so sure something doesn't come out of it. An actual crime was committed, unlike the other instance.

You thought the Nunes thing was a big deal too. Turns out he was just being a loyal Trump campaign guy, and didn't like seeing his guy take so much "heat."

Great m.o. for someone leading an investigation.
 
Just like the Nunes thing last week.

A whole lotta nuthin'.
you are not paying attention.
There is a YUGE number of IC reports that "unmask" Trump and associates names.

The Dem guy is saying "well it's possible they used the names because they were important in the context of the reports" -that's an allowed exeption to the rule.
But on the other hand they say it was most probably "incidental capture" to generate the large volume of reports.
That doesn't jive.

Even if we take into account Obama's removal of restrictions on NSA sharing "low level" ( so called breadcrumbs)
Nunes was talking about 15-20 reports at least! that were unmasked.
That's extraordinary -and they ALL came from after the election!
 
You thought the Nunes thing was a big deal too. Turns out he was just being a loyal Trump campaign guy, and didn't like seeing his guy take so much "heat."

Great m.o. for someone leading an investigation.

Nunes informed the public.....thats the big deal....of course not to you pinheads, but to the rest of the public that understands the issue.
 
You thought the Nunes thing was a big deal too. Turns out he was just being a loyal Trump campaign guy, and didn't like seeing his guy take so much "heat."

Great m.o. for someone leading an investigation.

Nunes is a distraction.

The fact is people were unmasked *illegally* and if the order came from high up on the chain of command you're looking at Watergate 2.0.

I know it doesn't involve damaging Trump, but they should investigate it anyway lol.
 
Nunes is a distraction.

The fact is people were unmasked *illegally* and if the order came from high up on the chain of command you're looking at Watergate 2.0.

I know it doesn't involve damaging Trump, but they should investigate it anyway lol.

Nunes wasn't a distraction last week. You & others were all over this board saying how his revelation made Trump "right."
 
Nunes wasn't a distraction last week. You & others were all over this board saying how his revelation made Trump "right."

Whatever Nunes is, or whatever message board geeks are bleating about, doesn't mitigate *the fact* unmasking US citizens from raw intelligence is a felony.

A felony was committed. Why do I get the idea you'd be less supine about it if you thought Trump could be behind it instead of the previous administration?

Don't tell me, I already know! Lol
 
LOL

By walking it back. Do you have a filter for the news that only let's pro-Trump stuff get through?

Nunes backed off the assertion that Trump officials were monitored by the IC.

But that's a straw man: unmasking US citizens from raw intelligence is a felony.

You disagree with the law?
 
Back
Top