Seymour Hersh Blasts Media for Uncritically Promoting Russian Hacking Story

Nomad said:
That's not what I said liar.

I said they are not children and they are not human beings.

You know you lost the argument when you have to twist people's words and lie about what they said.
Click to expand...

They are beings that are human. They are living humans growing in their natural environment. You support slicing and dicing them to murder them. Human embryos. Human beings.
 
GazzaQueen said:
They are beings that are human. They are living humans growing in their natural environment. You support slicing and dicing them to murder them. Human embryos. Human beings.
Click to expand...

tell that idiot nomad that they are not children in the same sense he is, but if he thinks an embryo isn't an unborn child, he's even dumber than he looks.......
 
Last edited:
Nomad said:
Seymour who????

Who the hell is he and who gives a shit what he thinks of says?
Click to expand...
He's some guy who thought the Russian investigation was silly.....way back before the inauguration. Oh....what a difference 100 days makes.
 
GazzaQueen said:
They are beings that are human. They are living humans growing in their natural environment. You support slicing and dicing them to murder them. Human embryos. Human beings.
Click to expand...

Since liberals fancy themselves as being scientific, they should know that human embryos are taxonomically categorized as Homo sapiens sapiens.

Can any of them cite an instance where a Homo sapiens isn't a human being?

I'll sit here and wait lol.
 
Nomad said:
IDGAF what he exposed.

You never heard of him prior to running across the article you quoted, while trolling Google for pro-Trump propaganda.
Click to expand...
Funny...he 'exposed' Abu Grahib? Hell...I heard the truth about that from a reserve soldier who was put in charge of the prison because he worked as a prison guard at home. The CIA came in, and told him to stand down.

That was on Public Radio a month before the news outlets had it.
 
zymurgy said:
try making it out of your echo chamber once in a while dipshit

Clinton bombing the aspirin factory alone was a big story. you are just stupid and the evidence is here for all to see
Click to expand...
Great. So what would he have said about Watergate before it happened? Because the OP is from 2 days after the inauguration.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Of course I did. I also supported keeping US troops in Iraq to prevent ISIS. I did not support Obama putting US troops back into Iraq, along with Somalia, Yemen, Syria, et al.
Click to expand...
This makes no sense. Like most of your posts.

I also find it odd that you supported torture in order to prevent something that was years from happening?
 
Milagro said:
The essential difference is that there was a huge amount of evidence of her wrongdoing whilst I haven't actually seen one scintilla of evidence for Russian collusion with Trump.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Where have you been looking?
 
Thing1 said:
If there was no collusion, there was no collusion. We'll see what the results are.

But I don't care of you're on the right or the left, or were 100% behind Trump or Hillary: I don't for a second understand why you or anyone wouldn't want it investigated, and to know exactly what happened and how much Russia was involved in this past election.
Click to expand...
That's not even the issue here. It's just the one trump keeps on the front burner, in order to cloud the issue of his conflicts of interest w/respect to Russia.

Unfortunately for him, a lot has come out since the OP. I'm surprised Anatta isn't using talking points that Bush used in his lead up to the war, in order to predict that Iraq would only take about 2 weeks to finish.
 
Last edited:
Althea said:
Funny...he 'exposed' Abu Grahib? Hell...I heard the truth about that from a reserve soldier who was put in charge of the prison because he worked as a prison guard at home. The CIA came in, and told him to stand down.

That was on Public Radio a month before the news outlets had it.
Click to expand...

He obviously didn't tell you how to spell it correctly though! Just for the record it is spelt Abu Ghraib.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
He's some guy who thought the Russian investigation was silly.....way back before the inauguration. Oh....what a difference 100 days makes.
Click to expand...
it sure does.. he was correct and the rest of the Russiaphobes were wrong...still waiting on that smoking gun of Russian collusion ( which is not the same as using Russian dressing on a salad).

For gawds sake the FBI didn't even do their own investigation of the DNG hacking -relying on Crowdstrike.
The NSA didn't have high confidence in the Clapper assessment
(leaving only Clapper and Brennan -not "17 intelligence agencies)..there are all kinds of holes only Russia pananoia fills
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
He obviously didn't tell you how to spell it correctly though! Just for the record it is spelt Abu Ghraib.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Given that we cannot converse with radios yet, and the text of a discussion doesn't print on my truck's radio, it would be impossible for anyone on the radio to 'tell' me anything. But your attempt at distraction in order hide the fact that Hersch didn't expose Abu Ghraib is typical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top