Serious question for Gun Advocates.

SmarterthanYou said:
not so much of hair splitting as it is making it extraordinarily vague on purpose. protecting the public 'at large' has no real definition, other than enforcing the laws that the public has in place. removing liability for failure to protect an individual, unless you're in some sort of custodial status, allows law enforcement to prioritize office safety above all else. nobody is going to want to work for the government if the government isn't going to protect them from liability. yes, we are both right in the sense that most cops will subject themselves to danger, voluntarily, but will not be held accountable for their failure to do so.
Click to expand...
Well, this is an "Just Plain Politics" first. Smarter Than You and Taichiliberal are in AGREEMENT on a point of American policy.

Can I stand the strain? ;):clink:
 
Dutch Uncle said:
No, but it's understandable why a political extremist would completely miss the point. No worries!
Click to expand...
You have no "point" Dutch. You just keep repeating in various forms the same old gun monkey crap. That YOU personally put labels on something with means nothing. I can (and have) logically and factually debunked EVERY gun lobby via congress talking point. Gun monkeys just ignore what they don't like and keep repeating their talking points.

The OP question forced gun monkeys to inadvertently omit that they are NOT about any true security in this country outside of their fanatical belief that if they can buy any type of weapon they want and carry it (strapped or otherwise) anywhere they want will solve all security problems. And if that means putting fellow citizens at risk, so be it (funny that Charlie Kirk got the EXACT result of his ideology that he professed).
 
Actually New Hampshire has hardly any gun laws, and we have the lowest crime in the U.S. So it's not just relevant, it's already happened to some extent. How is your - presumably more gun-controlled area - doing on crime?
 
RidleyReport said:
Actually New Hampshire has hardly any gun laws, and we have the lowest crime in the U.S. So it's not just relevant, it's already happened to some extent. How is your - presumably more gun-controlled area - doing on crime?
Click to expand...
Actually, you're not addressing the OP. Why would your state be okay with giving a gun to someone whom DHS deemed a security risk to the point of denying them access to commercial flights?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Actually, you're not addressing the OP. Why would your state be okay with giving a gun to someone whom DHS deemed a security risk to the point of denying them access to commercial flights?
Click to expand...
Am I required to follow your instructions while debating you? In answer to your question, even politicians and bureaucrats in New Hampshire are sometimes distrustful of DHS, an institution which pats down three year olds and once put one of its own Senators on the no fly list.

Are you going to answer my question? How is your state or region doing on crime compared to gun-friendly New Hampshire?
 
RidleyReport said:
Am I required to follow your instructions while debating you? In answer to your question, even politicians and bureaucrats in New Hampshire are sometimes distrustful of DHS, an institution which pats down three year olds and once put one of its own Senators on the no fly list.

Are you going to answer my question? How is your state or region doing on crime compared to gun-friendly New Hampshire?
Click to expand...
So there is an official decree from your governor and/or mayor(s) that will disregard any ruling, warning or action of the DHS that they see fit? Or is this an example of your dodgy mental flatulence?

And since NY/NYC has a markedly different denser, diverse population than New Hampshire, (more urban than suburban oriented) your comparison in relation to the OP is irrelevant (especially since New Hampshire is not on the "iron pipeline)

So to cut through BS, you're okay with some yahoo who is on the DHS no fly list coming to New Hampshire and buying a weapon? A straight an honest answer from you would be nice.
 
RidleyReport said:
Am I required to follow your instructions while debating you? In answer to your question, even politicians and bureaucrats in New Hampshire are sometimes distrustful of DHS, an institution which pats down three year olds and once put one of its own Senators on the no fly list.

Are you going to answer my question? How is your state or region doing on crime compared to gun-friendly New Hampshire?
Click to expand...
That one appears to not even have high school debate skills, let alone college education.
Observe his posts and judge for yourself. :dunno:
 
Taichiliberal said:
Poor Matty, he must be drunk to project himself like that. 😔
Click to expand...
bwyp8.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top