Senator Clinton Well Could beat McCain...

Superfreak said:
Talk about Cypressesque... did the resident idiot teach you this little spin move?

Show me where McCain has a "desire" to stay in Iraq for 5 generations... blah blah blah.

Does our keeping bases in Germany or Japan mean that all Presidents since WWII are war mongers?

Again with the song. yes, it was stupid of McCain to sing it. But to act like that is evidence of his desire to start a war with Iran is idiotic at best.
Click to expand...

Do you have earwax all over your fingertips?
 
Darla said:
Must you always have your nose up Superfreak the war monger's butt? It doesn't do much for your claims of not supporting the Iraqi war at all.
Click to expand...
What does pointing out lefties lying about his "wanting" to invade Iran have to do with whether I support war in Iraq?
 
LadyT said:
We're talking about Iran. Stick to the topic and stop trying to throw out red herrings. If Obama has indicated that he supports escalating our involvement in Iraq or that he wants to invade Iran, please provide evidence to support your claims.
Click to expand...

Ohh, sorry! That’s not possible.

Superfreak’s only arguments revolve around faux “they did the same thing!” absurdities. SF is the kind of guy who if, a Republican hits a guy in the head with a brick, and a Democrat picks up a brick and moves it out of the road so no one runs over it, will come in screaming “but they both had bricks in their hands! They do it to! Keep twisting though, I know it makes you feel good!”

In other words? Mad cow disease.
 
Damocles said:
What does pointing out lefties lying about his "wanting" to invade Iran have to do with whether I support war in Iraq?
Click to expand...

Well, one, it's not a lie, and two you are always backing up SF when he is claiming that McCain isn't the war candidate. And he is.

He's already told you. My friends, it's time for some straight talk; there's going to be more wars. My friends, I always keep my promises.

He promised you more wars. Vote for him and you'll get em. Doesn't take a rocket scientist!
 
Darla said:
Well, one, it's not a lie, and two you are always backing up SF when he is claiming that McCain isn't the war candidate. And he is.

He's already told you. My friends, it's time for some straight talk; there's going to be more wars. My friends, I always keep my promises.

He promised you more wars. Vote for him and you'll get em. Doesn't take a rocket scientist!
Click to expand...
One, I haven't suggested running the numbers of troops up in Iraq isn't escalating troop numbers.

Two, he sang a diddy that he remembered from the past, waived it off, then spoke on restraint and diplomacy. Other than that little diddy which clearly wasn't a "wish to invade" or an announcement of policy, do you have evidence of a wish of his to invade Iran?
 
Damocles said:
One, I haven't suggested running the numbers of troops up in Iraq isn't escalating troop numbers.

Two, he sang a diddy that he remembered from the past, waived it off, then spoke on restraint and diplomacy. Other than that little diddy, do you have evidence of a wish of his to invade Iran?
Click to expand...

To add to your number one... I also did not suggest that he isn't in favor of running up the number of troops. But as his site (that Beefy posted but apparently did not read) stated... the troop escalation he supports is to attempt to provide greater security and stability. Much in the same manner as the current surge has.
 
what a freakin joke, we kicked their ass years ago.
Staying for stability BAHAHAHHA!!
WTF do we care, they have been unstable for thousands of years. Americans are broke we can't support this false war.
 
Darla said:
Ohh, sorry! That’s not possible.

Superfreak’s only arguments revolve around faux “they did the same thing!” absurdities. SF is the kind of guy who if, a Republican hits a guy in the head with a brick, and a Democrat picks up a brick and moves it out of the road so no one runs over it, will come in screaming “but they both had bricks in their hands! They do it to! Keep twisting though, I know it makes you feel good!”

In other words? Mad cow disease.
Click to expand...

So tell me ditz... how is McCain singing bomb Iran so much more offensive than Hitlary or Obama stating they would bomb Pakistan?

Better yet, rather than answer... why don't you simply fuck off... the only mad cow here is you.
 
Damocles said:
One, I haven't suggested running the numbers of troops up in Iraq isn't escalating troop numbers.

Two, he sang a diddy that he remembered from the past, waived it off, then spoke on restraint and diplomacy. Other than that little diddy which clearly wasn't a "wish to invade" or an announcement of policy, do you have evidence of a wish of his to invade Iran?
Click to expand...

Damo, he is always furiously talking about "punishing" Iran, and getting tough with Iran. He is bush all over again. That's how you get into wars, with that kind of talk and willingness to escalate. Google "mccain punish iran". I mean, seriously, if you can't keep track of what your own candidate has been saying, for YEARS now, I'm supposed to take my time and compile his crap?
 
Darla said:
Damo, he is always furiously talking about "punishing" Iran, and getting tough with Iran. He is bush all over again. That's how you get into wars, with that kind of talk and willingness to escalate. Google "mccain punish iran". I mean, seriously, if you can't keep track of what your own candidate has been saying, for YEARS now, I'm supposed to take my time and compile his crap?
Click to expand...
So, no links? Nothing about a "wish to invade"? Nothing except when he talks about "getting tough" with Iran then suggests doing it with diplomacy?

Ok. I'm good. Plus, I do not support the "cow" remark at all.
 
Damocles said:
So, no links? Nothing about a "wish to invade"? Nothing except when he talks about "getting tough" with Iran then suggests doing it with diplomacy?

Ok. I'm good. Plus, I do not support the "cow" remark at all.
Click to expand...

What cow remark? Did I say something off-color, do I need to send you flowers again?

Damo, hard line talk leads to wars. All you have to do is look at the past 7 years! All he talks about is punishing Iran, more wars...I guess you will feel it's been proved only when he actually invades Iran? Well, I'm not going to wait for that. I like Obama's talk about diplomacy. You have to talk to people. I am so tired of this BS cowboy diplomacy. We're not going to talk to you, and if you do something we don't like, we're going to bomb you...maybe with nukes!

come on, how long is this world, never mind this country, going to last with that kind of mind-set?
 
Darla said:
What cow remark? Did I say something off-color, do I need to send you flowers again?

Damo, hard line talk leads to wars. All you have to do is look at the past 7 years! All he talks about is punishing Iran, more wars...I guess you will feel it's been proved only when he actually invades Iran? Well, I'm not going to wait for that. I like Obama's talk about diplomacy. You have to talk to people. I am so tired of this BS cowboy diplomacy. We're not going to talk to you, and if you do something we don't like, we're going to bomb you...maybe with nukes!

come on, how long is this world, never mind this country, going to last with that kind of mind-set?
Click to expand...
SF's remark.

Again, he speaks of using diplomacy, not of warring with them, and of showing restraint while being "tough but fair". So far you have nothing. I've seen no "wish" of his to invade Iran.
 
Damocles said:
SF's remark.

Again, he speaks of using diplomacy, not of warring with them, and of showing restraint while being "tough but fair". So far you have nothing.
Click to expand...

Oh, I have him on IA...I am well aware of his uncontrollable anger problem. I couldn't care less what he's saying.

He speaks of punishment, more troops, more wars...I guess if that's diplomacy to you, we define the word in two different ways.
 
Darla said:
Oh, I have him on IA...I am well aware of his uncontrollable anger problem. I couldn't care less what he's saying.

He speaks of punishment, more troops, more wars...I guess if that's diplomacy to you, we define the word in two different ways.
Click to expand...
So far we have two candidates that talk of invading Pakistan that you support. And one that says we should be "tough but fair" with one nation and that we should increase troop counts to give the Iraqis the promised security we should have been giving them when we stupidly invaded to begin with that Superfreak supports.

Hmm...

I'll go with the one that isn't talking about actually invading a new nation if I have to choose. Thankfully I can choose none of the above.
 
Damocles said:
So far we have two candidates that talk of invading Pakistan that you support. And one that says we should be "tough but fair" with one nation and that we should increase troop counts to give the Iraqis the promised security we should have been giving them when we stupidly invaded to begin with that Superfreak supports.

Hmm...

I'll go with the one that isn't talking about actually invading a new nation if I have to choose. Thankfully I can choose none of the above.
Click to expand...

Obama said that?
 
Damocles said:
So far we have two candidates that talk of invading Pakistan that you support. And one that says we should be "tough but fair" with one nation and that we should increase troop counts to give the Iraqis the promised security we should have been giving them when we stupidly invaded to begin with that Superfreak supports.

Hmm...

I'll go with the one that isn't talking about actually invading a new nation if I have to choose. Thankfully I can choose none of the above.
Click to expand...


I'd be thankful if you would stop posting obvious bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top