Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

E

Earl

Well-known member
Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

May 10, 20223:38 AM ET

Ayana Archie

.
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

A bill to grant security for the families of U.S. Supreme Court justices unanimously passed the Senate Monday.

The Supreme Court Police Parity Act would provide police protection to the immediate families of the nine justices and other officers of the court, if the "Marshal determines such protection is necessary," the legislation says.

The bill, which was introduced by Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, will now go before the House of Representatives.

"Threats to the physical safety of Supreme Court Justices and their families are disgraceful, and attempts to intimidate and influence the independence of our judiciary cannot be tolerated," Cornyn said in a statement.

The bill follows a leak last week of a draft Supreme Court opinion that, if unchanged, would overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that federally legalized abortions.

A protest and vigil against the move was organized at Justice Samuel Alito's house Monday.
npr.org
 
It is a sign of the times that the Supreme Court Justices require a bill to protect them from the far left Democrat Socialist loons.
 
Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code provides an official position of the U.S. government that the press secretary could not provide.

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
 
Earl said:
It is a sign of the times that the Supreme Court Justices require a bill to protect them from the far left Democrat Socialist loons.
Click to expand...
Yes, it was sad when Governors, Sec. of State, poll workers and our Congress are threatened as well. Poll workers didn’t get individual police protection, very sad.
 
Phantasmal said:
Yes, it was sad when Governors, Sec. of State, poll workers and our Congress are threatened as well. Poll workers didn’t get individual police protection, very sad.
Click to expand...

The thread is about:

"Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices."

Pay attention and stay on topic.
 
The left would be climbing the wall if the right protested at Kagan's home ...or Sotomayor's home or Breyer's home.
 
Earl said:
The thread is about:

"Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices."

Pay attention and stay on topic.
Click to expand...
Just as soon as you follow your own rule, Earl.

It’s the climate of our country right now. I haven’t seen any Justices attacked by an angry mob, yet.
 
Phantasmal said:
Just as soon as you follow your own rule, Earl.

It’s the climate of our country right now. I haven’t seen any Justices attacked by an angry mob, yet.
Click to expand...

They don't have to be attacked.

Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code:

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

I follow the rules, you are off topic.

Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
Yes, it was sad when Governors, Sec. of State, poll workers and our Congress are threatened as well. Poll workers didn’t get individual police protection, very sad.
 
Earl said:
They don't have to be attacked.

Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code:

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

I follow the rules, you are off topic.
Click to expand...
I’ll leave you to your echo chamber, I’ll join Jarod’s thread :)
 
On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision in favor of "Jane Roe" (Norma McCorvey) holding that women in the United States had a fundamental right to choose whether to have abortions without excessive government restriction and striking down Texas's abortion ban as unconstitutional.


There was no intimidation at Supreme Court Justices' homes in the nearly 50 years that followed.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Nah, the mobs only attacked the DHS people.

Here's the leftist goon version of what happened:

https://knock-la.com/lapd-dhs-police-attack-downtown-la-abortion-protest/
Click to expand...
There’s always two sides of the story, isn’t there.
“Some witnesses have accused the officers on social media of instigating the confrontation by straying beyond the courthouse, driving into the crowd and using aggressive crowd control measures. Regardless, it ratcheted up tensions between law enforcement and protesters at what until then had been an orderly demonstration over a draft Supreme Court opinion that, if adopted, would undercut abortion rights nationwide.

https://www.latimes.com/california/...-rights-protesters-in-l-a-s-streets?_amp=true
 
Phantasmal said:
There’s always two sides of the story, isn’t there.
“Some witnesses have accused the officers on social media of instigating the confrontation by straying beyond the courthouse, driving into the crowd and using aggressive crowd control measures. Regardless, it ratcheted up tensions between law enforcement and protesters at what until then had been an orderly demonstration over a draft Supreme Court opinion that, if adopted, would undercut abortion rights nationwide.

https://www.latimes.com/california/...-rights-protesters-in-l-a-s-streets?_amp=true
Click to expand...

Yeah, and you can generally extrapolate what really happened by hearing both sides.

They attacked the badges and the thing became a riot.
 
Phantasmal said:
There’s always two sides of the story, isn’t there.
“Some witnesses have accused the officers on social media of instigating the confrontation by straying beyond the courthouse, driving into the crowd and using aggressive crowd control measures. Regardless, it ratcheted up tensions between law enforcement and protesters at what until then had been an orderly demonstration over a draft Supreme Court opinion that, if adopted, would undercut abortion rights nationwide.

https://www.latimes.com/california/...-rights-protesters-in-l-a-s-streets?_amp=true
Click to expand...

You posted:

"I’ll leave you to your echo chamber, I’ll join Jarod’s thread."

Did you lie?
 
Otra vez:

Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code provides an official position of the U.S. government that the press secretary could not provide.

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top