Selective outrage is hypocrisy.

“We have a great country. We have radical left lunatics out there, and we just have to beat the hell out of them.”
 
RB 60 said:
Look, I don't agree with everything that is said by everyone on the right. I don't always agree with Trump.
Why would you think I agree that it's a necessary price to pay that innocent people get shot?
Do you believe it was "necessary" that Kirk was killed to advance what you think should restrict
these "open access" gun laws? What should change? Who should no longer have those rights?

So what do you think is/are "open access" gun laws? Should I have to give up my rights when I pose no threat to anyone?
What do you think would be "reasonable" gun control laws? Who would you think should give up those rights? Everyone?

Maybe you can answer the question why so many of these assholes who shoot people are so young? What motivates them?
So many on the left think us old white guys are racist haters and pose the threat to society, yet it isn't us who start shooting
people.

No, I don't think Kirk was "reprehensible," nor do I think he deserved to be assassinated. Kirk said a lot of things, yet you
nit-pick only those things he said that referred to gun laws now that he was assassinated. Do you believe he deserved to be shot?
Click to expand...
Address what i said and do not make up things i did not say.

I did not ask if you agree that is necessary to pay the price. I asked you if you think Charlie is a good person who had accepted the price of these gun laws that allow absurd access to assault weapons and for mentally ill and felons and others to easily get guns simply by getting them at gun shows, etc.

Charlie Kirk strongly pushed that 'these innocent extra deaths, such as kids in school shootings, are an ok cost to pay to keep those 2A laws as open as possible'.

So i ask you again, because only a reprehensible person would think that cost paid by kids or others is ok but not by them.

Do you think Kirk was reprehensible? OR do you think he was ok with his death too, as a cost to keep the guns laws as open as they are.
 
QP! said:
Address what i said and do not make up things i did not say.

I did not ask if you agree that is necessary to pay the price. I asked you if you think Charlie is a good person who had accepted the price of these gun laws that allow absurd access to assault weapons and for mentally ill and felons and others to easily get guns simply by getting them at gun shows, etc.

Charlie Kirk strongly pushed that 'these innocent extra deaths, such as kids in school shootings, are an ok cost to pay to keep those 2A laws as open as possible'.

So i ask you again, because only a reprehensible person would think that cost paid by kids or others is ok but not by them.

Do you think Kirk was reprehensible? OR do you think he was ok with his death too, as a cost to keep the guns laws as open as they are.
Click to expand...

I did address your post. I did not make anything up. Learn to read.
 
QP! said:
Address what i said and do not make up things i did not say.

I did not ask if you agree that is necessary to pay the price. I asked you if you think Charlie is a good person who had accepted the price of these gun laws that allow absurd access to assault weapons and for mentally ill and felons and others to easily get guns simply by getting them at gun shows, etc.

Charlie Kirk strongly pushed that 'these innocent extra deaths, such as kids in school shootings, are an ok cost to pay to keep those 2A laws as open as possible'.

So i ask you again, because only a reprehensible person would think that cost paid by kids or others is ok but not by them.

Do you think Kirk was reprehensible? OR do you think he was ok with his death too, as a cost to keep the guns laws as open as they are.
Click to expand...
Arby is literally retarded, he reacts and repeats what other MAGAts say
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top