Seems we are at a moment of definition for Republicans,

[cawacko]

Think about it for a minute or two...it'll come to you

So you have nothing.

 

[cawacko]

Democrats aren't privy to the bills.

So we can read in the paper what's being proposed but somehow Democrats in Congress are clueless?

 

[cawacko]

Bigger question is why are we cutting taxes at all?

I'm assuming that's a rhetorical question. And the biggest need is reform. Whether this proposed bill meets that need remains to be seen.

 

[archives]

I'm assuming that's a rhetorical question. And the biggest need is reform. Whether this proposed bill meets that need remains to be seen.

This isn't reform, and if we are to believe everything the Administration has said, the economy is in excellent shape, so why now add another one and half trillion dollar unaccounted addition on the National debt?

 

[Althea]

So we can read in the paper what's being proposed but somehow Democrats in Congress are clueless?

You think you know what's in the bill? Are you aware of the fetal personhood clause?

 

[Althea]

So you have nothing.

Keep thinking...it will come to you

 

[cawacko]

You think you know what's in the bill? Are you aware of the fetal personhood clause?

Slashing taxes for working families would mean focusing on the fetal personhood clause? Ok.

 

[Althea]

Slashing taxes for working families would mean focusing on the fetal personhood clause? Ok.

First...working class families are getting tax hikes. So you know nothing of the fetal personhood that's hidden in this bill?

See? Now you know why reading the paper doesn't give you all the facts.

 

[cawacko]

First...working class families are getting tax hikes. So you know nothing of the fetal personhood that's hidden in this bill?

See? Now you know why reading the paper doesn't give you all the facts.

Jesus. I have no desire to learn every single thing in the bill nor do I have the time. It's really not hard to say what taxes you think should be slashed for the working class but apparently that's below you.

 

[archives]

"Harming your kids" by cutting my taxes is a worthy goal that I support enthusiastically. If you're against something, I'm for it.

Appears emoji has once again displayed his lack of understanding of issues, and to think, but a year ago he was so concern about deficits and debt but now "supports enthusiastically" adding a trillion and a half unaccounted addition to the National Debt because it is "cutting his taxes"

 

[Русский агент]

Appears emoji has once again displayed his lack of understanding of issues, and to think, but a year ago he was so concern about deficits and debt but now "supports enthusiastically" adding a trillion and a half unaccounted addition to the National Debt because it is "cutting his taxes"

I'll understand if you can't prove I said anything of the sort, anchovies.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

First...working class families are getting tax hikes. So you know nothing of the fetal personhood that's hidden in this bill?

See? Now you know why reading the paper doesn't give you all the facts.

lol.....you have to admit, its one of the most important provisions of the act......tax cuts for the rich?......hell no, tax cuts for pregnant women......

 

[sear]

"tax cuts for the rich?......hell no" PP #72

I'm well aware of the Republican propaganda about it.
But the authoritative, credible sources I've reviewed seem to have reached a consensus that even principled Republicans agree with.

a) It'll explode the deficit.

b) It's far less about benefiting the middle-class as Trump promised, and more about lavish generosity to the Republican's wealthy $donors, ironically at the expense of the constituents.

 

[Русский агент]

I sure hope it passes.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

a) It'll explode the deficit.

lol....demmycrats think $1.5T over ten years is going to explode the deficit but they didn't mind Obama having a deficit of $10T over eight years......the only thing this tax plan will explode is lib'ruls heads.......