See what caps on liability get you!!

Topspin said:
your a fucking a hole hack.

1 hundreth of a percent is not good enough. LOFL
Leave your faux outrage in your car next time you fill up. Your convictions are as week as your faux outrage.
Click to expand...

He's absolutely right...and you guys know it!

This is 100% truth:

"Oil appologists want to blame President Obama because that way the mess is due to him and not the fact that if one rig out of a thousand has this problem even once in a 30 year period its still a disaster of huge proportions."
 
ZappasGuitar said:
He's absolutely right...and you guys know it!

This is 100% truth:

"Oil appologists want to blame President Obama because that way the mess is due to him and not the fact that if one rig out of a thousand has this problem even once in a 30 year period its still a disaster of huge proportions."
Click to expand...

Yes they do, and it is poetic justice
 
Topspin said:
your a fucking a hole hack.

1 hundreth of a percent is not good enough. LOFL
Leave your faux outrage in your car next time you fill up. Your convictions are as week as your faux outrage.
Click to expand...

So you are okay with a spill like this every ten years or so?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Using your scenario, every major business in the US should be closed.
Cars have been found with major defects.
Buildings have been found with major defects.
Food has killed people.
Utilities have failed.
People have died in hospitals, being treated for minor ailments.
Lawyers have failed their clients.
etc
etc
etc
Click to expand...

The point is that when cars fail the results are not as desasterous as this, and there are no viable alternatives to cars at this point.

When Buildings have defects, the results are not as disasterous as this, and there are no viable alternatives to buildings at this point.

Ect....
 
Jarod said:
So you are okay with a spill like this every ten years or so?
Click to expand...

I think to gain any moral ground you start driving a horse and buggy while you look down your nose at oil producers and consumers.

First, If it's criminal negligence like it's most certainly seems to be I'm about as ok with that as I am the Ok bombings.

Second, all you libtards outside the industry don't realize that hundreds of smaller spills happen annually, it is part of the business.
 
Topspin said:
I think to gain any moral ground you start driving a horse and buggy while you look down your nose at oil producers and consumers.

First, If it's criminal negligence like it's most certainly seems to be I'm about as ok with that as I am the Ok bombings.

Second, all you libtards outside the industry don't realize that hundreds of smaller spills happen annually, it is part of the business.
Click to expand...

Do you even know what Criminal Negligence is?

I acknoledge that we are in a mess and need to get out of it, and that getting out of this mess cannot include a current ban on all offshore oil drilling.
 
Jarod said:
The point is that when cars fail the results are not as desasterous as this, and there are no viable alternatives to cars at this point.

When Buildings have defects, the results are not as disasterous as this, and there are no viable alternatives to buildings at this point.

Ect....
Click to expand...

Now you want to add in the extent of the disaster.
And here I thought it was aboiut the 1/1000 equation.
 
Jarod said:
Do you even know what Criminal Negligence is?

I acknoledge that we are in a mess and need to get out of it, and that getting out of this mess cannot include a current ban on all offshore oil drilling.
Click to expand...

I do jackass, and if it's so then the 1/1000 doesn't apply
 
Jarod said:
The reason I am against it is that 1/1,000 is not good enough of a safety record when you are looking at this kinda mess from the one.

Sure you Oil appologists want to blame President Obama because that way the mess is due to him and not the fact that if one rig out of a thousand has this problem even once in a 30 year period its still a disaster of huge proportions. Its the same problem with nuclear power.
Click to expand...

It is if you punish the 1 and make them pay for every last cent of the damage. The other 999 will take notice. It is stupid to punish all 1000 equally.
 
If a government program were successful 999 times out of 1000, it would be shutdown for being too successful.
 
Damocles said:
Rubbish. I was here, you were busy being uninformed and missing from the conversation until Yesterday.

Your ignorance of my opinion (shoot, ANYBODY'S opinion on this subject that's been expressed on the board for the past weeks) should make you pause before you attempt to criticize it. Geebus, we've already covered all your questions 7 times over and you come in here acting like you are some sort of messiah. Quit it. Read the board and catch up before you start in on questions like, "What do you think Obama should have done?"! We've already covered that.
Click to expand...

Bullshit, the economic attack on President Obama was so thin you had to go with this one...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top