Second-largest U.S. Indian tribe expels slave descendants

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Second-largest U.S. Indian tribe expels slave descendants

OKLAHOMA CITY (Reuters) - The nation's second-largest Indian tribe formally booted from membership thousands of descendants of black slaves who were brought to Oklahoma more than 170 years ago by Native American owners.

The Cherokee nation voted after the Civil War to admit the slave descendants to the tribe.

But on Monday, the Cherokee nation Supreme Court ruled that a 2007 tribal decision to kick the so-called "Freedmen" out of the tribe was proper.

The controversy stems from a footnote in the brutal history of U.S. treatment of Native Americans. When many Indians were forced to move to what later became Oklahoma from the eastern U.S. in 1838, some who had owned plantations in the South brought along their slaves.

Some 4,000 Indians died during the forced march, which became known as the "Trail of Tears."

"And our ancestors carried the baggage," said Marilyn Vann, the Freedman leader who is a plaintiff in the legal battle.

Officially, there are about 2,800 Freedmen, but another 3,500 have tribal membership applications pending, and there could be as many as 25,000 eligible to enter the tribe, according to Vann.

The tribal court decision was announced one day before absentee ballots were to be mailed in the election of the Cherokee Principal Chief.

"This is racism and apartheid in the 21st Century," said Vann, an engineer who lives in Oklahoma City.

http://news.yahoo.com/second-largest-u-indian-tribe-expels-slave-descendants-011650136.html

interesting bit of history i did not know. and lousy way to treat someone.
 
I guess poet and TCliberal and others will be asking why even the poor Indians want nothing to do with them.....
 
why is it understandable?

the tribes finances aren't any better than the outside world. right now, we're trying to make it so that we can actually deport all illegals or remove them from free medical care because of the cost. the tribe is doing the same thing by expelling non cherokee individuals. That does not mean that those with actual cherokee bloodlines cannot go through the application process for admission, much like our own citizenship program.
 
the tribes finances aren't any better than the outside world. right now, we're trying to make it so that we can actually deport all illegals or remove them from free medical care because of the cost. the tribe is doing the same thing by expelling non cherokee individuals. That does not mean that those with actual cherokee bloodlines cannot go through the application process for admission, much like our own citizenship program.

they were your slaves, you already made them part of your nation. reneging now is complete horse pucky. finances are no reason to cut away tribe members. i mean really, they were your slaves and you're now cutting their descendents off. what about their finances?
 
they were your slaves, you already made them part of your nation. reneging now is complete horse pucky. finances are no reason to cut away tribe members. i mean really, they were your slaves and you're now cutting their descendents off. what about their finances?

the cherokee nation has it's own constitution and own set of laws. I can only assume that the decision was made according to their laws because the article doesn't go in to detail.
 
they were your slaves, you already made them part of your nation. reneging now is complete horse pucky. finances are no reason to cut away tribe members. i mean really, they were your slaves and you're now cutting their descendents off. what about their finances?

They weren't my slaves. My family owned exactly 0 slaves. The storty said the slaves belonged to the Indians. Read it again.
 
Back
Top