Second Amendment - incorrectly interpreted.

[SmarterthanYou]

In terms as explained by Sen. Trumbull (who wrote the section) that “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. included not owing allegiance to any other country, no they are not.

This doesn't mean they are subject to our laws. In fact those who argue for Anchor Baby rights are claiming that aliens are not subject to our laws.

no, your bias and idiocy is showing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I am curious as to what you think Trumbull thinks the allegiance of German parents are when he states their children would be US citizens if born in the US. He also states that the children of all other countries would be citizens. Trying to pull a single sentence out of context that is later clarified by him during debate on changes to the amendment doesn't exactly work in the real world.

If you really want to use the dissent in Kim Wong Ark then you have to remove the US citizenship of everyone in the US that also carries the passport of another country. Good luck with that.

Such extreme desperation.

The hive is panicking knowing that Anchor Babies will be struck down.

The dishonesty of speaking of loyalty to German parents - no one is speaking of parents, this is about loyalty to foreign governments. The good Senator made clear this was not about granting citizenship to those who held allegiance to foreign powers.

 

[Uncensored2008]

no, your bias and idiocy is showing.

So, "NUHN UHN" then?

One of the three possible responses from leftists.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trumbull said the Chinese and Gypsies are just like Germans when it comes to the amendment as written since it makes no distinction as to country of origin of parents.

And?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Such extreme desperation.

The hive is panicking knowing that Anchor Babies will be struck down.

The dishonesty of speaking of loyalty to German parents - no one is speaking of parents, this is about loyalty to foreign governments. The good Senator made clear this was not about granting citizenship to those who held allegiance to foreign powers.

Since you don't think German parents have allegiance to Germany, I guess you think that foreign babies born in the US are US citizens.

Allegiance of German parents is not a child's loyalty to the parents.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Since you don't think German parents have allegiance to Germany, I guess you think that foreign babies born in the US are US citizens.

Allegiance of German parents is not a child's loyalty to the parents.

I think you're desperately flailing. You've lost this debate just as Stalinists will lose Anchor Baby fraud when this gets to SCOTUS.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So, "NUHN UHN" then?

One of the three possible responses from leftists.

you really have no clue who you're talking to, do you?

 

[Uncensored2008]

you really have no clue who you're talking to, do you?

I generally don't care. I respond to the message, not the messenger.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I think you're desperately flailing. You've lost this debate just as Stalinists will lose Anchor Baby fraud when this gets to SCOTUS.

Not exactly sure how I lost this debate since I am quoting the majority of a 6-2 Supreme Court decision and you are relying on the minority opinion to claim you have won. It seems you think the loser is the winner.