ZenMode
Well-known member
Stop making shit up.So you want an unstructured life.
Projection. Void.Is this how you justify your misery?
Stop making shit up.So you want an unstructured life.
Projection. Void.Is this how you justify your misery?
Stop him, Deaf-Boy, He's getting away!Hmm. Are you on something now? I hope you're okay. I mean it.
Okay I am concerned. I suggest that you call someone.Stop him, Deaf-Boy, He's getting away!
800 million dollarsAgain that doesn't make you honest abe
I promise you watch fox news more than I do. You're so fucking lazy
The truth is this nation said you are wrongNope. There is no such thing. A "civil union" (in which procreation is impossible in principle) is not a marriage (in which procreation is possible in principle).
The truth is toxic to leftists; I totally get it.
A marriage is fruitful (can have children in principle); a "civil union" is not fruitful (can't have children in principle)
YAIF. Redefinition fallacy.gfm7175 to English translation
gfm7175 - "RQAA"
English - "I'm actually even stupider than @Into the Night so I will just quote him."
Various.And how did he write them? Was it "pen" and paper? Where did he write them?
Not possible.It is legally recognized as marriage. Sorry.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacies. Assumption of victory fallacy.Saying things that are irrational and nonsensical over and over doesn't magically make them true.
Better luck next time....
Redefinition fallacy.Marriage is a union between two people. That's it. That's the definition.
You DID make the 'definition'. Redefinition fallacy.Fail how? It's the definition. I didn't make the definition.
You're wasting your time trolling.Redefinition fallacy.
Sorry, Sybil. Democrats can't comprehend most things. You routinely deny the law, the Constitution, history, theories of science, mathematics, logic, and philosophy.Additionally, government doesn't define marriage. What government does is recognize certain marriages for tax and survivability purposes. Legal and money.
What the MAGAts can't comprehend is that this is a 14th Amendment issue, not a Church issue.
You can't blame your problems on anybody else, Sybil.They are the same person. It comes from here: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/59/nights-numbered-mantra-list
#29
Here's the funniest thing: the socks stroke each other daily. LOL
Buzzword fallacy.You're wasting your time trolling.
There is no such thing as 'same sex marriage'.Nope. You have not shown how same-sex marriage and the definition of marriage caused the breakdown of society and family units.
You do know that you are trolling, right?There is no such thing as 'same sex marriage'.
The 14th amendment does not mention the word 'marriage' at all, LeftNut.AI Overview
+6
The Fourteenth Amendment protects the right to marry as a fundamental right, based on the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. This was affirmed in the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges, which ruled that same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry and required all states to license and recognize same-sex marriages. The amendment also protects the right to marry without racial discrimination, as established in Loving v. Virginia.
You can't blame your problems on anybody else, Sybil.He will never be able to formulate a coherent reason. He's only regurgitating what he hears on Fox News or the voices in his head.