SCOTUS protects marriage equality

[gfm7175]

Explain how having equal recognition is supremacy?

I already explained the supremacy to you.

Women were given the right to vote in exactly the same manner as men. Was that supremacy by women?

No, and you're still purposely evading the heart of the conversation.

 

[Into the Night]

Yawn. Still mocking deaf people.

Be original.

He's mocking you, Deaf Boy.

 

[ZenMode]

He already did. RQAA

Nope. Just repeating a claim that something is a certain way isn't explaining.

 

[AProudLefty]

Irrelevance fallacy.

Lost context again? Only took you a few seconds.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. The animal thing is a stupid fucking argument. There is an objective definition. I’ve cited it numerous times.

Buzzword fallacies. Attempted objective for subjective.

 

[ZenMode]

I already explained the supremacy to you.

No, and you're still purposely evading the heart of the conversation.

Nope. You keep claiming it IS supremacy, but haven't explained how equal recognition is supremacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. Just repeating a claim that something is a certain way isn't explaining.

He didn't. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Lost context again? Only took you a few seconds.

LIF

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. You keep claiming it IS supremacy, but haven't explained how equal recognition is supremacy.

RQAA

 

[ZenMode]

RQAA

Yah, sorry, not getting sucked into 'tardville today.

 

[AProudLefty]

He's mocking you, Deaf Boy.

@gfm7175, @IBDaMann and @Into the Night all swinging in a tree.

If that isn't MMD or schizophrenia, then it's a copycat. No originality whatsoever.

 

[AProudLefty]

I already explained the supremacy to you.

No you have not.

No, and you're still purposely evading the heart of the conversation.

You are evading.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm doing amazing knowing I didn't vote for a pedophile for president, unlike you.

Buzzword fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

MAGAts are all anti-American scumbags.

That you are. Democrats have always been so.

This is why I have no sympathy when their neighbors and/or relatives remove them from existence.

You want people to kill you now?

 

[gfm7175]

Nope. You keep claiming it IS supremacy, but haven't explained how equal recognition is supremacy.

Equal treatment under the law is not supremacy.
They already have equal treatment under the law.
What they want currently is SUPREMACY.
I've already explained the supremacy part of it to you.

 

[AProudLefty]

Buzzword fallacy.

Buzzsaw fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Equal treatment under the law is not supremacy.
They already have equal treatment under the law.
What they want currently is SUPREMACY.
I've already explained the supremacy part of it to you.

No you have not.

 

[Into the Night]

it's to make the point that there is nothing preventing states from allowing gay marriage. We aren't obligated to abide by a definition of marriage from thousands of years ago and the people who are fighting gay marriage today are almost entirely the religious right, because they want to force their religious definition of marriage on us.

The definition of marriage has not changed, Void. It is defined as a union between a man and a woman. It has no other meaning.
The English language is not a religion.

 

[ZenMode]

Equal treatment under the law is not supremacy.

Good we agree. So, if all relationships are recognized, legally, as marriage, then there's no supremacy.

They already have equal treatment under the law.

Nope. Equal treatment would mean everyone is able to have the relationship they WANT to have recognized by the state

What they want currently is SUPREMACY.

If same-sex and opposite sex couples are all equally recognized as marriage, where is the supremacy?

Equality can't be supremacy.

I've already explained the supremacy part of it to you.

Nope. You've claimed supremacy exists. It clearly makes no more sense than women asking to be able to vote being labeled as supremacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Weird I'm not gay so I don't know why you are having a fit. LOL

You're miserable then? I don''t see him having a fit because you're miserable.