SCOTUS protects marriage equality

Jake Starkey said:
Every time you open your mouth.

Yakuda hates that it is gay marriage, and he knows it.

Now hetero marriage is no longer giving heterosexuals special status.
Click to expand...
A lot of MAGAts are rumored to be on the DL when it comes to homosexuality. Hence all the homophobia as cover coming from them.
 
WinterBorn said:
And who decides whether it is a marriage or a civil union?
Click to expand...

Sane people do; you fashion victims are merely falling for marketing scams., easily bullshitted into believing you're 'progressive and intelligent' if you parrot silly crap like 'gay marriage'. In fact you and the rest hide behind euphemisms like 'gay', which makes it clear you know it's not kosher, but you want to pretend to be 'tolerant n stuff'. It's 1960's libertoon rubbish.
 
Jake Starkey said:
No, that is not the definition of marriage.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is.
Jake Starkey said:
Marriage is a legally and socially recognized union between individuals that establishes rights and obligations between them, their children, and their families. It is often marked by a ceremony and is considered both a personal commitment and a societal institution.
Click to expand...
Some of that comes along with marriage, but that's not what marriage foundationally is. Under this description of marriage, ANYTHING could be a marriage, thus NOTHING is really a marriage.
Jake Starkey said:
Merriam-Webster defines marriage as:

  • “The state of being united as spouses in a contractual relationship recognized by law.”
  • It also refers to “the mutual relation of married persons” and “an intimate or close union”.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage

Words have meanings.
Click to expand...
Merriam-Webster is wrong.
 
WinterBorn said:
And who decides whether it is a marriage or a civil union?
Click to expand...
Who decides what anything is?

When it comes to logic, marriage (a union between a man and a woman) and civil union (a union between a man and a man, or a woman and a woman) are NOT identical to each other and NEVER will be. One major difference is that marriage can be fruitful (it is possible, in principle, to procreate) while civil union can never be fruitful (it is impossible, in principle, to procreate).

Civil union is based upon men having sex with men (and women having sex with women), which is an abomination unto God. It deviates away from God's design for sex/procreation.

Civil union is nothing more than an unfruitful imitation of marriage. Ultimately, it only leads to harm and emptiness, not benefit and joy.

Matthew 7:13-14 (EHV): “Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it. How narrow is the gate, and how difficult is the way that leads to life, and there are few who find it."
 
gfm7175 said:
Who decides what anything is?

When it comes to logic, marriage (a union between a man and a woman) and civil union (a union between a man and a man, or a woman and a woman) are NOT identical to each other and NEVER will be. One major difference is that marriage can be fruitful (it is possible, in principle, to procreate) while civil union can never be fruitful (it is impossible, in principle, to procreate).

Civil union is based upon men having sex with men (and women having sex with women), which is an abomination unto God. It deviates away from God's design for sex/procreation.

Civil union is nothing more than an unfruitful imitation of marriage. Ultimately, it only leads to harm and emptiness, not benefit and joy.

Matthew 7:13-14 (EHV): “Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it. How narrow is the gate, and how difficult is the way that leads to life, and there are few who find it."
Click to expand...
Christianity or the Bible IS NOT the government.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I see you are resorting to silly arguments.
If the law only allows persons to own and carry a single shot weapon of any kind that would be OK with you based on your logic since the law wouldn't restrict them from having a gun but only restrict it to a certain kind.
Click to expand...
See this is the the kind of first level of thinking that makes you leftists so stupid. I wouldn't necessarily be ok with it but it's the las dumbass. How I feel about it is fucking irrelevant. The law never prevented a gay person from marrying someone of the opposite sex and it didn't allow straight people to marry someone of the same sex. It didn't favor one group over another. Now you you can either counter that argument for you can't. And tell me about love is nonsensical since love is a requirement for marriage gay or straight.
 
Yakuda said:
Thr whole thing is based on nonsensical drivel. No gay person was refused marriage because they were gay. This was never about marriage
Click to expand...
They were denied marriage if they didn't marry someone that the God of Abraham agreed with.
 
Yakuda said:
See this is the the kind of first level of thinking that makes you leftists so stupid. I wouldn't necessarily be ok with it but it's the las dumbass. How I feel about it is fucking irrelevant. The law never prevented a gay person from marrying someone of the opposite sex and it didn't allow straight people to marry someone of the same sex. It didn't favor one group over another. Now you you can either counter that argument for you can't. And tell me about love is nonsensical since love is a requirement for marriage gay or straight.
Click to expand...
And this is why you are so stupid because you make stupid arguments.

The law never prevented people from marrying someone of their own race but it did prevent marrying outside your race in many states. According to your logic that would mean such a law is just fine and should still be allowed.

The Constitution is the supreme law and overrules all other laws which is why Loving is just as relevant is Obergefell. Both rulings use equal protection as the basis of their ruling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top