SCOTUS... a good idea

[BRUTALITOPS]

Blocking is blocking whether it is by simply not voting on it until after November 8th or voting it down. If they vote it down they'll likely have to do it repeatedly as he'll just continue to nominate people.

They can't stop him from nominating somebody. That's silly. All he has to do is say: This guy/gal! and boom it's a nomination... I just say delay a vote until after the election and then vote. That's about it.

yeah but some are saying obama should literally not nominate someone and to wait for next election cause he shouldn't use his last year to do things..

 

[Damocles]

yeah but some are saying obama should literally not nominate someone and to wait for next election cause he shouldn't use his last year to do things..

Which could happen if Obama just didn't nominate somebody, but they can't "block" him from nominating somebody. They can simply withhold consent, totally constitutional and very much within normal political parameters.. This idea that it will "kill" the republicans to simply schedule the vote after November 8th is just as absurd.

This is entirely normal. It is something the left would expect of a D majority Senate if a divisive republican were in his last year. If the D wins they vote to confirm the new nominee from Obama, if an R wins they vote it down. Simple as that.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Goldberg is absolutely insane. Why on god's green earth would a moderately liberal president appoint a conservative justice? Obama has no obligation to pander to the far right. It's not enough that cons are already bashing him and he hasn't done anything. I'd like to know why they think they're entitled to get another con justice after 30 years of Scalia.

Same reason you would be arguing for a liberal justice if the roles were reversed cumtwat and don't even try to pretend otherwise.

I am so enjoying watching leftardiots feign allegiance to the constitution all of a sudden as if it should be taken word for word and wasn't written by a bunch of racist white guys

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

The JPP democrat party clown car of inconsistency veers off into the ditch yet again

 

[canceled.2021.1]

yeah but some are saying obama should literally not nominate someone and to wait for next election cause he shouldn't use his last year to do things..

So what? They stop him from nominating someone. For crying out loud. Are people that fucking sensitive now?

"Oh boo fucking hoo, the big meanie republicans said Obama shouldn't nominate someone"

For crying out loud

 

[canceled.2021.1]

there is absolutely no reason why obama should have to wait. appointing judges is in his job description. It happened in his term. I do not agree with conservatives that have come up with some bizarre idea that a president with 1/8th of his time left shouldn't nominate a supreme court justice. the people already voted for him in 2012 knowing partially he might have the opportunity to nom someone. so that question has already been answered.

The senate just needs to nut up and block and deny if they have a problem. But delaying a nomination is completely nonsensical.

Sorry Grind,but you are acting as stupid as KKKhristiefan right now. Nobody can stop Obama from nominating someone. NOBODY.

It is irrelevant what they say, he can nominate who he wants. What happens to that nominee is what matters.

This is no different than someone in Congress saying "the Presidents budget is dead on arrival".

Or how is this any different than Obama saying in the past that the GOP shouldn't bother passing a bill repealing Obamacare because he will just veto it. How is that any different.

They aren't saying he isn't allowed to. They are essentially saying don't bother. It is like threatening a veto. No different

Now I apologize for taking the drastic step of calling you KKKhristiefan stupid. I realize that it is a serious accusation. But, I felt a case of tough love was warranted to shake you out of this illogical funk.

PS

I am still on Team Grind. Zimmerman forever!!!

 

[CFM]

Why should Obama appoint a conservative? To appease blatant obstructionism?

Incredible. I'm not a huge fan of an ultra-liberal court, but I hope righties really get it handed to them this November. Hillary would stack the court for many years to come.

Obstructionism? You mean like Obama himself proposed doing when he was a Senator? Got it. What's good for the black boy as a Senator is wrong when the black boy gets to pick.

 

[CFM]

Hmmmm.



Such an intellectual response.

ROFL at the Super Hypocrite.

The hypocrite by example is the black boy that, as Senator, did what the black boy now says is wrong when he gets to nominate.

 

[Rune]

More stupidity from poor little Thing. You have been taken to the wood shed on two threads and you still pretend you are 'winning'. Quite comical in your idiocy.

You again prove you missed the point of the OP.

No one missed the stupud point of your stupid OP or your own stupuditu in defending it.
It is a stupid notion promulgated by a stupid poster who is reduced to throwing temper tantrums as his stupidity is pointed out.