SCOTUS 9-0 against EPA - Crying Chuck calls it MAGA Court despite UNANIMOUS ruling

Bigdog

Bigdog

Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Did Schumer just join the AOC squad? What a partisan nutcase. :palm:

"Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate bodies of water, calling it a "MAGA" court even though the decision was 9-0.

On Thursday, the high court issued an opinion that narrowed the EPA's broad definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). The court said the federal government must define WOTUS as a water source with a "continuous surface connection" to major bodies of water.

The decision upended an attempt by the Biden administration to regulate wetlands, lakes, ponds, streams and other "relatively permanent" waterways, which had relied on a broad reading of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). "

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-rips-maga-supreme-court-9-0-vote-epa-waters-rule



As predicted, Authoritarian Nazi Dems try to abuse Nixon's Clean Water Act.
 
Bigdog said:
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate bodies of water, calling it a "MAGA" court even though the decision was 9-0.
Click to expand...

Dog is being dishonest again. There are two decisions in the case, the individual case decision, and then there is the new wetlands definition decision(the precedent). Clearly Schumer is talking about the new wetlands definition decision. The individual case was decided 9 to 0, but Schumer was not talking about that. The precedence setting new wetlands definition was a 5-4 decision. Just a reminder, there are 6 right wing justices, so it was not even unanimous for the right wing(Kavanaugh dissented).
 
Walt said:
Dog is being dishonest again. There are two decisions in the case, the individual case decision, and then there is the new wetlands definition decision(the precedent). Clearly Schumer is talking about the new wetlands definition decision. The individual case was decided 9 to 0, but Schumer was not talking about that. The precedence setting new wetlands definition was a 5-4 decision. Just a reminder, there are 6 right wing justices, so it was not even unanimous for the right wing(Kavanaugh dissented).
Click to expand...

Post a quote and a link, please.
 
Holy Fuck Big Dog is a fucking moron. It was 9-0, well, except for the four justices that voted against it.

Big Dog needs to STFU.
 
Walt said:
Dog is being dishonest again. There are two decisions in the case, the individual case decision, and then there is the new wetlands definition decision(the precedent). Clearly Schumer is talking about the new wetlands definition decision. The individual case was decided 9 to 0, but Schumer was not talking about that. The precedence setting new wetlands definition was a 5-4 decision. Just a reminder, there are 6 right wing justices, so it was not even unanimous for the right wing(Kavanaugh dissented).
Click to expand...

That's why I rarely even read his threads.

They're just factually twisted half truths or pure bullshit about 99% of the time.

He and a couple of others here seem to get some kind of perverse pleasure from that kind of trolling.
 
Conservatives are dishonest. That is their default position. They lie when the truth will do. Big Dog is exhibit A. He has nothing interesting to say. Just hate, hate, and more hate.
 
Bigdog said:
Did Schumer just join the AOC squad? What a partisan nutcase. :palm:

"Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate bodies of water, calling it a "MAGA" court even though the decision was 9-0.

On Thursday, the high court issued an opinion that narrowed the EPA's broad definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). The court said the federal government must define WOTUS as a water source with a "continuous surface connection" to major bodies of water.

The decision upended an attempt by the Biden administration to regulate wetlands, lakes, ponds, streams and other "relatively permanent" waterways, which had relied on a broad reading of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). "

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-rips-maga-supreme-court-9-0-vote-epa-waters-rule



As predicted, Authoritarian Nazi Dems try to abuse Nixon's Clean Water Act.
Click to expand...

Chucky is a bed wetting liberal.

Great thread and accurate...as usual, Bd.
 
Look, here's Earl, one of the most dishonest posters i've ever encountered, rushing in to defend his fellow serial liar.

GROAN.

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
 
This message is hidden because Bigdog is on your ignore list.

As I said, you are the least interesting troll in JPP history..
 
Earl said:
Chucky is a bed wetting liberal.

Great thread and accurate...as usual, Bd.
Click to expand...

How is it accurate when it mentions the wrong decision instead of the part Shumer disliked?


It’s a fucking fox lie


You just like being lied to
 
Concart said:
Conservatives are dishonest. That is their default position. They lie when the truth will do. Big Dog is exhibit A. He has nothing interesting to say. Just hate, hate, and more hate.
Click to expand...

They have nothing left but lies to back their positions



It’s called maximum lie factor


When you lie you have to lie some more to defend the first lie


On an on and on


Until your whole world is nothing but lies
 
Nomad said:
That's why I rarely even read his threads.

They're just factually twisted half truths or pure bullshit about 99% of the time.

He and a couple of others here seem to get some kind of perverse pleasure from that kind of trolling.
Click to expand...




The entire right in this nation is doing it
 
Nomad said:
That's why I rarely even read his threads.

They're just factually twisted half truths or pure bullshit about 99% of the time.

He and a couple of others here seem to get some kind of perverse pleasure from that kind of trolling.
Click to expand...

You never have an argument. All you do is call me a FAG.

:dunno:
 
Bigdog said:
Did Schumer just join the AOC squad? What a partisan nutcase. :palm:

"Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate bodies of water, calling it a "MAGA" court even though the decision was 9-0.

On Thursday, the high court issued an opinion that narrowed the EPA's broad definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). The court said the federal government must define WOTUS as a water source with a "continuous surface connection" to major bodies of water.

The decision upended an attempt by the Biden administration to regulate wetlands, lakes, ponds, streams and other "relatively permanent" waterways, which had relied on a broad reading of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). "

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-rips-maga-supreme-court-9-0-vote-epa-waters-rule



As predicted, Authoritarian Nazi Dems try to abuse Nixon's Clean Water Act.
Click to expand...






However, the court split 5-4 in its analysis of how the federal government should define a water source under the Clean Water Act.




Your link asshole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top