No, and I don't need either. If climate science worked, like other science does, then the predicted models would be close to actual results. Yet, after decades of modeling and what-have-you, climate scientists are close to 100% wrong--badly wrong--on outcomes and predictions. That argues they don't know what the fuck they're talking about. Guessing by a psychic could do better.
When scientists hypothesized plate tectonics, within decades it was proven correct. When Einstein hypothesized his theory of relativity and that mass and energy were interchangeable, it was proven within decades. On the other hand, climate science gets it wrong and not just wrong but often badly, totally, wrong.