Scientific Proof: Warmers Hate Trees!

Brilliant argument. I'd be proud to be a flat earth climate denialist, and have you on my side.

Now, can you point us to one single, solitary piece of legitimate climate science research that has ever claimed that the risk of elevated CO2 levels is the asphyxiation of humans, or toxicity to humans?

I'll check back. And if you can't provide one single solitary example of this, we will assume this is another of your 1/3 threads; aka a thread totally devoid of reality and science, but chock full of hilarity and boneheadedness.

You go Cy....never admit you've been wrong on any level, duped by con-men posing as scientists....a gullible fool....
The arrogance of the liberal elite...to think they can alter the earth's climate....not really much different than believing you know whats best for every one around you.....
 
Now, can you point us to one single, solitary piece of legitimate climate science research that has ever claimed that the risk of elevated CO2 levels is the asphyxiation of humans, or toxicity to humans?

That is kind of the whole point. CO2 is not dangerous to humans at any level we may ever reach on Earth. Even if mankind WANTED to increase CO2 to make deserts into rain forests and feed the hungry of the world, I doubt we could do so by any significant amount. Perhaps if we had big industrial complexes pumping out CO2 day and night for a few centuries, with the intended purpose of doing this... but it would be daunting.

The issue is NOT whether CO2 is dangerous to people, we know it's not. So why is the left now acting as if it is? Why is the EPA classifying CO2 as a "pollutant" and why is maineman pulling at my heart strings about "spewing shit" into the atmosphere? If CO2 is not dangerous to people, and IS beneficial to plant life, and no scientific evidence shows it contributes to climate change, why are we even discussing it? Why do we want to further hamper industry and business by mandating carbon restrictions and increasing their taxes? It just seems to me, killing jobs and the economy is a bit drastic for something as harmless as CO2.
 
so your blatherings on human asphyxiation criteria was a strawman, which nobody on the right or the left has ever mentioned as a risk associated with CO2 or climate change.

Strawmen are poor board ettiquette.

Now, the answers to all your questions are here, they are available from America's foremost and most respected scientific body - the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

http://dels.nas.edu/climatechange/

It's not my job to provide you a science education, or write a long winded post to you, when the answers to your questions are easily available to you and the general public.... I did a cursory review of the NAS website, and legitimate scientific answers are available to all your questions, if you would take the time to get off the rightwing blogs and seek actual non-partisan information.

Now, I have invested time and given you resources to easily find answers to all your questions from a highly reputable source, with unimpeachable qualifications....so now I have a question for you:



Please name one reputable and internationally recognized scientific organization, with expertise in climate science, that agrees with you that humans aren't effecting the climate........I will check back to see what you came up with.

.
 
Last edited:
The Teabagger Position:

Dixie, Tinfoil, Meme, Webbway, USFreedom, Southernman, Ice Dancer, . Et al:

"Armed with no science data, the Warmers continue to insist that it's really possibly likely that man might be contributing to climate change through emission of carbon dioxide, a natural element which all mammals produce…..the actual SCIENCE indicates there is no cause for alarm, and no basis for the arguments of the Global Warming theories". -- DIXIE


The position of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences:

U.S. National Academy of Sciences:

Most scientists agree that the warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to begin taking steps to prepare for climate change and to slow it. Human actions over the next few decades will have a major influence on the magnitude and rate of future warming. Large, disruptive changes are much more likely if greenhouse gases are allowed to continue building up in the atmosphere at their present rate.
 
U.S. National Academy of Sciences:

Most scientists agree that the warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

That was in the 2008 report...what are they saying today, after the hoax was exposed ....
 
DIXIE: The first thing they scream is, "but look at all the other studies out there!" The thing is, they were all predicated on the evidence which was flawed, and raw data which is mysteriously no longer available, so they are pretty much irrelevant now. It's like trying to make the case for Milli-Vanilli winning a lifetime achievement award at the Grammys, based on the number of fans they had and records sold!

PRISSY: Most scientists agree that the warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.


See what I mean?
 
That was in the 2008 report...what are they saying today, after the hoax was exposed ....


that's the crypiss MO. Post some outdated shit that used to serve as the appeal to authority card. LOL

I'd love to see what they're saying now. I bet they're not saying a thing. So many of the cheerleaders for the IPCC and carbon alarmism have simnply shut the fuck up for the last three months LOL
 
Probably because of things like coldest winters on record since 1899, and stuff like that. It's hard to look someone in the face without laughing, and tell them you want money for "global warming" when you're freezing your balls off.

:cof1:
 
Please name one reputable and internationally recognized scientific organization, with expertise in climate science, that agrees with you that humans aren't effecting the climate........I will check back to see what you came up with.

.


The Final Answer from Dixie/Teabaggers:


ZERO, NONE, NADA, ZILCH.

Not one single reputable and internationally recognized scientific organization, which has expertise in climate science, agrees with you that humans aren't contributing to global warming




You idiots were easily fooled into supporting the disasterous Iraq war.

Do you really expect me to take your word, and the word of the rightwing blogs you read? When there isn't a single reputable science organization that agrees with you?

Carry on.
 
The sheer embarrassment of having their scientific evidence tainted, has not stopped the 'Global Warmers' from attempting to continue advancing their agenda. The first thing they scream is, "but look at all the other studies out there!" The thing is, they were all predicated on the evidence which was flawed, and raw data which is mysteriously no longer available, so they are pretty much irrelevant now. It's like trying to make the case for Milli-Vanilli winning a lifetime achievement award at the Grammys, based on the number of fans they had and records sold!

Armed with no science data, the Warmers continue to insist that it's really possibly likely that man might be contributing to climate change through emission of carbon dioxide, a natural element which all mammals produce as long as they live, and always have since the very first mammal. Carbon dioxide, also known as CO2, is one of several gasses which comprise the "greenhouse gases" we hear so much about. What are the others? Ozone... remember it? We had to ban all hairsprays and aerosols back in the 80s because we were destroying the "ozone layer" ...a part of our greenhouse system. Methane is another... cow farts! But seriously, the leading contributor of methane to our atmosphere is someone you wouldn't expect! It's good old Mother Earth! Yep... she belches out millions of cubic tons of the stuff every year. And finally, the behemoth greenhouse gas, one that gets so little notoriety, although it actually represents about 90% of the greenhouse gases... It's our good friend, Mr. Water Vapor! Oh yes... the very thing that Hydrogen Engines emit!

Now the Warmers have, for some reason, decided to myopically focus on carbon dioxide, our "carbon footprint" and ways they can regulate (control) business and industry, by insisting there is some detrimental element to carbon dioxide. It is now considered a "pollutant" by Warmers, and this has to be constantly corrected. It would take concentrations of carbon dioxide 1500 times greater than present, to be detrimental to humans. Subsequently, plant life flourishes in a rich environment of carbon dioxide. Greenhouses typically use carbon dioxide to produce more robust plants. Chances are, those roses you will give your sweetie on Sunday, will be the result of an atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide.

Botanical Scientists studying the history of plant life, will tell you that most plants on Earth evolved in a much richer CO2 environment, and up until the last 10k years, our plants have actually been starving for CO2. Ecological Scientists will say, a result of higher carbon dioxide in our atmosphere, will cause plants to grow in more arid regions, because CO2 helps the plants to retain water. As plant life flourishes on Earth, solutions to world food shortages is diminished, this should be obvious as an advantage to humans.

Regardless of where we turn, the actual SCIENCE indicates there is no cause for alarm, and no basis for the arguments of the Global Warming theories. Yet, the Warmers continue to forge on! Determined to make us "knuckledraggers" understand... to pound it into our heads with their propaganda... we WILL listen to what they have to say! And basically, what they have to say is a profession of their personal faith, and nothing more. Perhaps the Warmers should form a Church? Tax exempt status, freedom to practice their religious beliefs... it might be fitting for them at this point! Because basically, that is what you have, a religious cult, believing in something not based or rooted in science, and oblivious to scientific facts.

bump
 
Wow, that's a brilliant strategy! When totally bested in debate and left with nothing tangible to argue, just keep bumping the thread and say nothing! It's so much better than the old strategy of having nothing left to argue but bumping the thread with more stupid commentary! I really think you guys say it best when you say nothing at all! Bravo!
 
The sheer embarrassment of having their scientific evidence tainted, has not stopped the 'Global Warmers' from attempting to continue advancing their agenda. The first thing they scream is, "but look at all the other studies out there!" The thing is, they were all predicated on the evidence which was flawed, and raw data which is mysteriously no longer available, so they are pretty much irrelevant now. It's like trying to make the case for Milli-Vanilli winning a lifetime achievement award at the Grammys, based on the number of fans they had and records sold!

Armed with no science data, the Warmers continue to insist that it's really possibly likely that man might be contributing to climate change through emission of carbon dioxide, a natural element which all mammals produce as long as they live, and always have since the very first mammal. Carbon dioxide, also known as CO2, is one of several gasses which comprise the "greenhouse gases" we hear so much about. What are the others? Ozone... remember it? We had to ban all hairsprays and aerosols back in the 80s because we were destroying the "ozone layer" ...a part of our greenhouse system. Methane is another... cow farts! But seriously, the leading contributor of methane to our atmosphere is someone you wouldn't expect! It's good old Mother Earth! Yep... she belches out millions of cubic tons of the stuff every year. And finally, the behemoth greenhouse gas, one that gets so little notoriety, although it actually represents about 90% of the greenhouse gases... It's our good friend, Mr. Water Vapor! Oh yes... the very thing that Hydrogen Engines emit!

Now the Warmers have, for some reason, decided to myopically focus on carbon dioxide, our "carbon footprint" and ways they can regulate (control) business and industry, by insisting there is some detrimental element to carbon dioxide. It is now considered a "pollutant" by Warmers, and this has to be constantly corrected. It would take concentrations of carbon dioxide 1500 times greater than present, to be detrimental to humans. Subsequently, plant life flourishes in a rich environment of carbon dioxide. Greenhouses typically use carbon dioxide to produce more robust plants. Chances are, those roses you will give your sweetie on Sunday, will be the result of an atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide.

Botanical Scientists studying the history of plant life, will tell you that most plants on Earth evolved in a much richer CO2 environment, and up until the last 10k years, our plants have actually been starving for CO2. Ecological Scientists will say, a result of higher carbon dioxide in our atmosphere, will cause plants to grow in more arid regions, because CO2 helps the plants to retain water. As plant life flourishes on Earth, solutions to world food shortages is diminished, this should be obvious as an advantage to humans.

Regardless of where we turn, the actual SCIENCE indicates there is no cause for alarm, and no basis for the arguments of the Global Warming theories. Yet, the Warmers continue to forge on! Determined to make us "knuckledraggers" understand... to pound it into our heads with their propaganda... we WILL listen to what they have to say! And basically, what they have to say is a profession of their personal faith, and nothing more. Perhaps the Warmers should form a Church? Tax exempt status, freedom to practice their religious beliefs... it might be fitting for them at this point! Because basically, that is what you have, a religious cult, believing in something not based or rooted in science, and oblivious to scientific facts.

This is just one outright lie after the other. Is it possible for you to tell the truth dixie? Conservatism is a disease.
 
This is just one outright lie after the other. Is it possible for you to tell the truth dixie? Conservatism is a disease.

To be fair, he's not really lying. Dixie just doesn't understand anything in the realm of science.

You should see him when he gets going on evolution...
 
This is just one outright lie after the other. Is it possible for you to tell the truth dixie? Conservatism is a disease.

To be fair, he's not really lying. Dixie just doesn't understand anything in the realm of science.

You should see him when he gets going on evolution...

Well it appears neither of you have anything to offer which contradicts a damn thing I said. I see where you say it's all lies, and I see a bunch of childish name calling and character assassinations, but not one shred of evidence to support your side of the argument.

Onzies desperately tries to tug the thread away into another debate... let's not talk about this anymore, let's talk about evolution! I don't know why, you'll just lose that debate too, and then want to talk about something else. But for the mentally vapid and morally bankrupt, this is what we get.

No, "to be fair", Onzies, I am not lying, this is science, and you have no rebuttal. You're comprehension of science is right up there with Chicken Little's.... nothing to base your FEELINGS on, you just want to panic and freak out over nothingness, and try to dramatically alarm everyone around you, even though you have NO scientific basis for your stupidity.
 
"A wing could evolve into an arm, but an arm couldn't just magically pop in from nowhere because a human needed it. "

LOL

Don't talk to me about "comprehension of science"....
 
"A wing could evolve into an arm, but an arm couldn't just magically pop in from nowhere because a human needed it. "

LOL

Don't talk to me about "comprehension of science"....

What the fuck are you even talking about moron? Gawd I hate it when I make you retards ramble incoherently! Why do you want to try to change the thread into a debate about evolution??????????????????????

I can only guess it is because you hope to get a chance to win your ass back?
 
Back
Top