Science knowledge has no effect on Republican beliefs

Yes. Do I need to say it louder and harder? You don't need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing, but you do need to be one to have a valid opinion on climate science. It is a subject matter beyond the ken of laity. Thus the need for expertise. Were that not the case, fuckninnys like Dump and Palin would be rocket scientists, right?

partial credit to Bob Dylan
I was going to ask you about copyright issues. Personally, one of my faves is "You're an idiot babe. It's a wonder that you still know how to breathe'.
 
So why does Al Gore or Bill Nye get to pontificate the way they do?

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note

Why do they? Because they can have an opinion and some people value it. After all he has a masters in science! They are exactly in my position. I don't want you to accept my opinion, neither do they. They and I think everyone should err on the side of the vast majority of experts in the field. This isn't hard to understand. I'm surprised I'm getting such resistance.
 
Why do they? Because they can have an opinion and some people value it. After all he has a masters in science! They are exactly in my position. I don't want you to accept my opinion, neither do they. They and I think everyone should err on the side of the vast majority of experts in the field. This isn't hard to understand. I'm surprised I'm getting such resistance.

Al Gore has a degree in government and took some university classes later in religion. I can see where someone like you might confuse that with a "masters in science" though.
 
Al Gore has a degree in government and took some university classes later in religion. I can see where someone like you might confuse that with a "masters in science" though.
He got a D in science I believe. Bill Nye has a mechanical engineering degree.

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
 
Al Gore has a degree in government and took some university classes later in religion. I can see where someone like you might confuse that with a "masters in science" though.

And, he's riding this fake science cash cow allllll the way to the bank.
 
Hey Einstein, the Milagro post references a climate science naysayer whose paper did not provide any of his own data, just used modeling and data of others. Oops.:palm:

I don't give a fiddlers fuck about Tom's post and it has ZERO bearing on what I said which is 100% correct. Therefore I humbly accept your concession

Thank you
 
Al Gore has a degree in government and took some university classes later in religion. I can see where someone like you might confuse that with a "masters in science" though.

Twas a joke. I had heard he made that funny claim at some point in his career and has been mocked for it. Masters in science is just funny.
 
what a fucking stupid assed party

they hate science


they hate math


they hate history


they hate reality


But man do they LOVE Putin

You mean like the science of "communication" and "articulation"? He be, she be, they be, we be? LAMO If it was that important that you pretend to be smart it appears that you would educate yourself in the use of modern English. Just say'n. There is a difference in the phony tuff and crazy brave just like there is a difference in someone that is actually intelligent and those who pretend to be intelligent via the use of digit dexterity and the net.

Layman's term? An asshole is an asshole no matter how much they want accolade.
 
So there IS a consensus that man is responsible for global warming.

As we've been saying all along.
No you stupifying fuckwit, there is a consensus that there is an anthropogenic contribution to warming. Many believe that the actual amount is fairly low maybe around 10-20%, very few believe it to be anywhere near 100%. How many times do you have to be told the same thing?

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
 
Last edited:
Back
Top