Schumer Shutdown!

[gfm7175]

Like I said in Post #33. Your posts under that subject title says it all. Stop trying to be a weasel, you're insulting the animal.

Like I said, nothing "orgasmic" was said. The most I said was: "I'd be perfectly okay with that". Hardly "orgasmic".

Anyone can read it for themselves.

 

[Jarod]

So, you Felonites are for or against shutdown?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Like I said, nothing "orgasmic" was said. The most I said was: "I'd be perfectly okay with that". Hardly "orgasmic".

Anyone can read it for themselves.

Anyone with a high school G.E.D. knows what a "euphemism" is, (which doesn't require a "verbatim" quote) ..... which leaves you out. You MAGA morons love to think your myopic meanderings are "clever". But as usual, the chronology of the posts will always be your undoing. Examples being: Posts #40, 42, 43 with your ROTFLOL imogees while parroting MAGA talking points. www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/chuck-schumer-now-owns-the-shutdown.230652/page-3

 

[Taichiliberal]

"Nails me" for WHAT? I never "orgasmed" over any "headline" and you know it. You can't provide even ONE instance of me "orgasming" over a "headline".

The most I ever said within that entire thread (about the potential shutdown) was "I'm perfectly okay with that". Hardly "orgasmic"......

You're such a lispy leftist loon.

You haven't shown a single example yet. See above.

Post in thread 'Schumer Shutdown!'

Mar 17, 2025

Like I said, nothing "orgasmic" was said. The most I said was: "I'd be perfectly okay with that". Hardly "orgasmic".

Anyone can read it for themselves.

Anyone with a high school G.E.D. knows what a "euphemism" is, (which doesn't require a "verbatim" quote) ..... which leaves you out. You MAGA morons love to think your myopic meanderings are "clever". But as usual, the chronology of the posts will always be your undoing. Examples being: Posts #40, 42, 43 with your ROTFLOL imogees while parroting MAGA talking points...

• Taichiliberal