Schmidt: Trump will dump Pence for Nikki Haley in failed 2020 reelection bid

this is ONE CONTINUING CASE


the republican party kept getting caught BREAKING THE CONSENT DECREE AND CHEATING NEW VOTERS EVERY ELECTION


so they kept being punished by the courts
 
evince said:
but it wont be that long and Trumps ass will no longer be lickable ( he old and fat and eats turds for lunch)


they need a new brand

pence wont garner the dupes they need

Haley is young, pretty and smart compared to trump


they need a NEW idol to keep this going
Click to expand...

Haley is as phony, self-serving and disingenuous as the rest. Pretty? lol

haley.jpg


 
evince said:
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree



Court Case
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
Facebook

Twitter

Share

In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

Published: November 5, 2016

Gerrymandering & Fair Representation
Redistricting
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree. On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (March 22, 2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)
2009
Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (October 31, 2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (November 5, 1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
Complaint (February 11, 1982)
Click to expand...

if you go to the site ( Brennan was a past SCOTUS member and this university named this elections site packed with our election history after him) you can click on everyone of the line items and get the COURT DOCUMENTS and outlines of the particular republican election CRIMES
 
Althea said:
Haley won't last. Nobody gives head like Pence. It's kinda creepy how he always stares adoringly at trump, when trump is lying to the crowd that's assembled. Pence will never speak out against any trump policy, as opposed to Haley.

And she's much smarter than he is.
Click to expand...

Nobody knows about morning wood like you, are you pining for Shrillary?
 
Haley is a flip-flopping opportunist, who was one of Trump's worst critics in the beginnings of Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, who went as far as calling him a liar who lies through his teeth about everything.

But, yet, recently during an interview, Haley said that Donald Trump has never lied about anything.

So my only conclusion is Nikki Haley is nothing more than a political prostitute looking to feather her own ass.
 
In July 2013, Haley was fined $3,500 by the State Ethics Commission and given a "public warning" for failing to report the addresses of eight donors during her 2010 campaign for governor.[76]
 
american sikh council: Racists call Sikh 'towel head' in ...
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ikh-towel-head-in-US/articleshow/55426673.cms

Racists call Sikh 'towel head' in US AMRITSAR: Sikhs' apprehensions over escalating racist attacks against them under Donald Trump 's rule got more credence following a community member in Nashville, whose horse was shot in a suspected hate crime in July, was called a "towel head" on Saturday by a group of "young white males".
 
evince said:
but it wont be that long and Trumps ass will no longer be lickable ( he old and fat and eats turds for lunch)


they need a new brand

pence wont garner the dupes they need

Haley is young, pretty and smart compared to trump


they need a NEW idol to keep this going
Click to expand...
And Pence will probably be under indictment next year
 
CharacterAssassin said:
LOL! No, you sputtering whore, they're not even remotely terrified of her, w/her record and esp. her history of adultery.
Click to expand...
And...trump will never allow a superior intellect to show him up. He fears strong women, and Haley personifies all that he hates in women.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top