Scandalous new proof utterly debunks the Russia hoax, let's review the Democrat lies

Scroll up to the links provided. Comey testified to it. Hillary sent emails to Huma. The wife forwarded them to her elected official husband. Not illegal since Huma didn't know the info Hillary sent her was classified. That's in the links too.

So no actual information from an FBI report? Just your interpretation of what the media said about Comey's testimony which is in direct conflict with what the FBI said about how the emails were backed up and perhaps a few forwarded. But you seem to have missed this part: The emails weren’t marked as classified, though the FBI later found classified information contained in some emails recovered from Weiner’s laptop.

Hillary had over 60,000 emails on her server and over 30,000 were personal emails. Huma forwarded a few to her husband. Likely the one's that talked about when a wedding was going to be or what party was happening that weekend. The problem is your link completely blows up your claims that Clinton violated any law.
 
That's not quite true nor did he say "exclusive" but interesting you want to make it Powell's fault.

The fact remains Hillary knew she was violating classified material protocols but did it anyway...presumably because she felt the rules didn't apply to her.

No. The fact remains that you have no evidence supporting your allegation. Clinton has said the opposite of what you claims she knew. Unless you have actual evidence of Hillary knowing something that the FBI felt she didn't know and she claimed she didn't know we can mark this one as you falling all over your own slobber.
 
We now have even more hard evidence that it is Democrats who are the threat to "our democracy."

Not that they hadn't already made that clear by:

-helping illegal immigrants break into our country by the millions and illegally vote,

-doxing, censoring, and canceling people who disprove their narratives, and burning down cities while protecting terrorists and persecuting anyone who fights back,

-protecting voter fraud,

-incessantly trying to overthrow elections they lose with hoaxes and coup attempts,

-staging 1/6,

-weaponizing government agencies to destroy and silence their opponents,

-shutting down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopening hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.


But I digress...

We already had proof positive that Democrats doctored fake evidence, lied to a federal judge, and illegally spied on a sitting U.S. president to overthrow an election they lost (with the news media laundering their made-up evidence to make it look like it came from DOJ and FBI), but now that it's an irrefutable fact, let's review all the lies your "legitimate, not tabloid trash at all" news sources told you and ask ourselves...

...How many times must Democrats be humiliated by unassailable proof that their sources constantly lie to them and deliberately misinform them into committing heinous betrayals of everything this country stands for (like this un-American attack on 'our democracy') before they comprehend that perhaps they should re-evaluate their poisonous, deranged extremist worldview and the seditious traitors who manipulate them into betraying their country at every turn?

View attachment 21912

1) "There’s no real evidence," she said. "This is ’60 Minutes.’ We can’t put on things we can’t verify."

There was unmistakable proof documenting the spying as far back as FOUR YEARS AGO. Our corrupt, biased news media, who were in on the coup, simply talked right past it like it wasn't being laid directly in their laps.

Putting on "things we can't verify" is ALL the news media appear to do.

2) "Nothing happens and they just move on to the next conspiracy theory," Lemon said to Cuomo during a handover. "It is never going to end and guess what? People who want to believe that BS are going to believe it."

Projection much? Again, now we have even more proof that it is DEMOCRATS who move from one BS conspiracy theory to the next with zero accountability. Everything Democrats assert turns out to be a bold-faced, intentional, pot-calling-the-kettle-black lie.

3) In an October 2021 episode of MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," host Rachel Maddow suggested the intention behind efforts to probe the investigation was always to re-route the investigation away from Trump himself. "It’s a boomerang," she said. "Because it’s apparently an ongoing, concerted Republican and pro-Trump project to try to turn the investigation of the Russia scandal into some kind of scandal itself."

Deflecting about deflecting. Sane people proving that the most ludicrous Democrat conspiracy theory of all time was a staged frame job from the beginning is apparently somehow THEM being the conspiracy theorists.

Got to appreciate the "next level" asinine lunatic extremism of Rachel Maddow. :laugh:

'60 Minutes,' CNN, MSNBC, downplayed, criticized Durham probe of Russia investigation

And as always, the moment some devastating bombshell evidence emerges proving that everything Democrats have spent YEARS building their entire lie-based worldview on was a known, deliberate falsehood from the beginning...our "enemy of the American people" news media, who were literally intentional co-conspirators in this gross act of treason, respond by imposing a total media blackout and silencing anyone who points it out.

View attachment 21913

And the Democrat terrorist cult burns more books and cheers.

For the record, even Democrats now want Hillary investigated for outright treason at this point, even according to their own bullshit polling pseudo-science.

Note that Durham, who spurred the whole last right-wing insanity, says that is not what he said or proved. Fox immediately started lying about it and it carries on as usual. The small minds on this board who only read right-wing propaganda jumped all over it. You have nothing.
Trump was not spied on. The FBI, whose function is to keep tabs on Russians who are in America, or communicating with Americans, are spied on. It just so happens s that Trump's campaign staff was in constant contact with Russians.
 
We now have even more hard evidence that it is Democrats who are the threat to "our democracy."

Not that they hadn't already made that clear by:

-helping illegal immigrants break into our country by the millions and illegally vote,

-doxing, censoring, and canceling people who disprove their narratives, and burning down cities while protecting terrorists and persecuting anyone who fights back,

-protecting voter fraud,

-incessantly trying to overthrow elections they lose with hoaxes and coup attempts,

-staging 1/6,

-weaponizing government agencies to destroy and silence their opponents,

-shutting down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopening hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.


But I digress...

We already had proof positive that Democrats doctored fake evidence, lied to a federal judge, and illegally spied on a sitting U.S. president to overthrow an election they lost (with the news media laundering their made-up evidence to make it look like it came from DOJ and FBI), but now that it's an irrefutable fact, let's review all the lies your "legitimate, not tabloid trash at all" news sources told you and ask ourselves...

...How many times must Democrats be humiliated by unassailable proof that their sources constantly lie to them and deliberately misinform them into committing heinous betrayals of everything this country stands for (like this un-American attack on 'our democracy') before they comprehend that perhaps they should re-evaluate their poisonous, deranged extremist worldview and the seditious traitors who manipulate them into betraying their country at every turn?

View attachment 21912

1) "There’s no real evidence," she said. "This is ’60 Minutes.’ We can’t put on things we can’t verify."

There was unmistakable proof documenting the spying as far back as FOUR YEARS AGO. Our corrupt, biased news media, who were in on the coup, simply talked right past it like it wasn't being laid directly in their laps.

Putting on "things we can't verify" is ALL the news media appear to do.

2) "Nothing happens and they just move on to the next conspiracy theory," Lemon said to Cuomo during a handover. "It is never going to end and guess what? People who want to believe that BS are going to believe it."

Projection much? Again, now we have even more proof that it is DEMOCRATS who move from one BS conspiracy theory to the next with zero accountability. Everything Democrats assert turns out to be a bold-faced, intentional, pot-calling-the-kettle-black lie.

3) In an October 2021 episode of MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," host Rachel Maddow suggested the intention behind efforts to probe the investigation was always to re-route the investigation away from Trump himself. "It’s a boomerang," she said. "Because it’s apparently an ongoing, concerted Republican and pro-Trump project to try to turn the investigation of the Russia scandal into some kind of scandal itself."

Deflecting about deflecting. Sane people proving that the most ludicrous Democrat conspiracy theory of all time was a staged frame job from the beginning is apparently somehow THEM being the conspiracy theorists.

Got to appreciate the "next level" asinine lunatic extremism of Rachel Maddow. :laugh:

'60 Minutes,' CNN, MSNBC, downplayed, criticized Durham probe of Russia investigation

And as always, the moment some devastating bombshell evidence emerges proving that everything Democrats have spent YEARS building their entire lie-based worldview on was a known, deliberate falsehood from the beginning...our "enemy of the American people" news media, who were literally intentional co-conspirators in this gross act of treason, respond by imposing a total media blackout and silencing anyone who points it out.

View attachment 21913

And the Democrat terrorist cult burns more books and cheers.

For the record, even Democrats now want Hillary investigated for outright treason at this point, even according to their own bullshit polling pseudo-science.

Where is the proof?
 
No. The fact remains that you have no evidence supporting your allegation. Clinton has said the opposite of what you claims she knew. Unless you have actual evidence of Hillary knowing something that the FBI felt she didn't know and she claimed she didn't know we can mark this one as you falling all over your own slobber.

Are you saying Comey lied to Congress?

Why are you sweating this? Hillary, the smart one of the Clintons, has a long history of being both legal and running up to the ethical line then walking along it...sometimes, like this classified material problem the Director of the FBI testified upon, she deliberately crossed both the ethical line but the legal one.

I'm not a lawyer. Trump, despite four years of trying everything he could, didn't do shit. What are you worried about? What's your fear here?
 
We (everyone reading this thread) are still waiting for you to illustrate the illegal activity that Hillary was 'hiding' by using her own server.

LOL Seriously? Dude, I quote Comey's testimony and you think it's my problem to prove he said it? WTF?
 
Are you saying Comey lied to Congress?

Why are you sweating this? Hillary, the smart one of the Clintons, has a long history of being both legal and running up to the ethical line then walking along it...sometimes, like this classified material problem the Director of the FBI testified upon, she deliberately crossed both the ethical line but the legal one.

I'm not a lawyer. Trump, despite four years of trying everything he could, didn't do shit. What are you worried about? What's your fear here?

I'm not saying Comey lied. I am saying you are relying on the media report of one statement taking out of context. Media reports aren't evidence when the testimony is available.


The problem you have is Comey stated they don't have any evidence she deliberately crossed any line which is why they decided to not prosecute since they couldn't show the intent necessary to meet the legal requirements of the law. You have assumed an intent that is not in evidence. You are free to make that conclusion but you can't claim it is evidence.
 
I'm not saying Comey lied. I am saying you are relying on the media report of one statement taking out of context. Media reports aren't evidence when the testimony is available.


The problem you have is Comey stated they don't have any evidence she deliberately crossed any line which is why they decided to not prosecute since they couldn't show the intent necessary to meet the legal requirements of the law. You have assumed an intent that is not in evidence. You are free to make that conclusion but you can't claim it is evidence.

The links say otherwise.

You forgot to say "the problem you people have..." LOL That's not what Comey stated as posted previously.
 
Are you saying Comey lied to Congress?

Why are you sweating this? Hillary, the smart one of the Clintons, has a long history of being both legal and running up to the ethical line then walking along it...sometimes, like this classified material problem the Director of the FBI testified upon, she deliberately crossed both the ethical line but the legal one.

I'm not a lawyer. Trump, despite four years of trying everything he could, didn't do shit. What are you worried about? What's your fear here?

So in looking at the actual testimony here is the entire quote....

And the team also told me, we cannot finish this work before the election. And then they worked night after night after night, and they found thousands of new emails, they found classified information on Anthony Weiner. Somehow, her emails are being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information, by her assistant, Huma Abedin. And so they found thousands of new emails and then called me the Saturday night before the election and said thanks to the wizardry of our technology, we've only had to personally read 6,000. We think we can finish tomorrow morning, Sunday.

Comey is talking about the information that is known or believed before the investigation is completed.

Comey then goes on to say...
We think we can finish tomorrow morning, Sunday.

And so I met with them and they said we found a lot of new stuff. We did not find anything that changes our view of her intent. So we're in the same place we were in July. It hasn't changed our view and I asked them lots of questions and I said okay, if that's where you are, then I also have to tell Congress that we're done
 
So in looking at the actual testimony here is the entire quote....

Comey is talking about the information that is known or believed before the investigation is completed.

Comey then goes on to say...

If Trump was speeding on I-95 and his excuse was "well in all honesty, Officer, I didn't intend to speed, it just happened", would you buy it? I wouldn't.

Intent and committing a crime are two different things. Hillary is a lawyer. She knows better and she knew what she was doing. You want to claim she's ditzy.
 
Note that Durham, who spurred the whole last right-wing insanity, says that is not what he said or proved. Fox immediately started lying about it and it carries on as usual. The small minds on this board who only read right-wing propaganda jumped all over it. You have nothing.
Trump was not spied on. The FBI, whose function is to keep tabs on Russians who are in America, or communicating with Americans, are spied on. It just so happens s that Trump's campaign staff was in constant contact with Russians.

BULLSHIT. HE SAID THAT NOTHING ANYONE ELSE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE SAID CHANGES THE FACTS HE FILED.

THEN THE FAKE NEWS COMPLETELY LIED ABOUT IT, WITH PHONY-ASS HEADLINES AND ALL.


MAKEUP SOME MORE BULLSHIT.
 
If Trump was speeding on I-95 and his excuse was "well in all honesty, Officer, I didn't intend to speed, it just happened", would you buy it? I wouldn't.

Intent and committing a crime are two different things. Hillary is a lawyer. She knows better and she knew what she was doing. You want to claim she's ditzy.

Speeding laws do not have an intent requirement. The law you are claiming Hillary violated does require proving intent. Find me a single speeding law that only applies if the person willfully was going faster than the speed limit.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;

https://ypdcrime.com/vt/article30.php#t1180-a.
no person shall drive in excess of
such maximum speed limits at any time.
 
Speeding laws do not have an intent requirement....

And there we go. I only have my JPP Behavioral Researcher license, legal stuff is outside my area of expertise and certification.

OTOH, life experience has taught me to never trust a liar and that if you vote for the lesser of two evils you will still have evil.
 
Facts always matter. You don't have your facts correct. If you don't like being called out for getting things wrong then take the time to get them correct.

It's okay if you make an assertion you can't back up. Lot's of people do it.

Other than calling me wrong, have you provided evidence that Comey didn't say as I quoted and linked?
 
BULLSHIT. HE SAID THAT NOTHING ANYONE ELSE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE SAID CHANGES THE FACTS HE FILED.

THEN THE FAKE NEWS COMPLETELY LIED ABOUT IT, WITH PHONY-ASS HEADLINES AND ALL.


MAKEUP SOME MORE BULLSHIT.

Dude, you're a fucking moron who looks like a bigger fucking moron when you always post in bolded all caps.

You whine about bullshit in bolded, all caps font when all you do is shit on the page. Do you have any hobbies? Beading? Meditation? An exercise program?
 
Back
Top