Scandal gate, gate.

Mott the Hoople said:
Funny.....that's what most of us are thinking about you. Republicans have no evidence, as in NONE WHAT SO EVER, that Obama has been involved in either a cover up or directly ordered actions which contravene the law. You have none, zero, zilch, nada....ergo.....NO SCANDAL.

Though these are serious incidents in governance that must be taken seriously you have absolutely no evidence what so ever that the President was involved in any inappropriate acts.

So it boils down to a bunch a Republicans blowing hot air and not doing any governing.....which is what they are trying to avoid cause any right wing legislative agendas are going to make them far more unpopular than they all ready are.
Click to expand...

The Obama is the sole person with a motive. He also had the means and opportunity.
 
Jarod said:
The point is that it turned into a huge heap of nothing because there was no evidence to connect Reagan or Bush to the scandal. Much like what is going to happen in your triple "scandal" assault.

Bush went on to get elected, just like Clinton will do.
Click to expand...

LOL... you think Iran-Contra turned into nothing? Seriously, stop commenting on things that you clearly have no understanding of.
 
Jarod said:
The point is that it turned into a huge heap of nothing because there was no evidence to connect Reagan or Bush to the scandal. Much like what is going to happen in your triple "scandal" assault.

Bush went on to get elected, just like Clinton will do.
Click to expand...

Ah, Jarod, I think you better check your facts.
 
Superfreak said:
LOL... you think Iran-Contra turned into nothing? Seriously, stop commenting on things that you clearly have no understanding of.
Click to expand...

Nothing with regards to harming Reagan or Bush... Like this wont harm Obama or Clinton.
 
Jarod said:
The point is that it turned into a huge heap of nothing because there was no evidence to connect Reagan or Bush to the scandal. Much like what is going to happen in your triple "scandal" assault.

Bush went on to get elected, just like Clinton will do.
Click to expand...
Uhh......I think you need to go check your facts. Iran Contra was hardly nothing and had not Reagan fully cooperated with the Iran Contra investigation and had they found evidence that he willfully and knowingly broke the law he would have been impeached. That's hardly nothing.

The Iran/Contra scandal is a poor comparison. Whitewater is a more accurate comparison.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Oh well hells bells he's guilty then! Of what...I don't know but lets hang the bastard anyways!!
Click to expand...
No, the proper course is an investigation, followed by impeachment by the House, and then conviction by the Senate. Since the Senate is majority Democrat and they don't care about the truth, impeachment will be as far as it gets.

Unless of course the Senate goes GOP in 2014. Either way everyone will know the truth anyway, that The Obama is a shit-bum Chicago politician, nothing more.
 
Jarod said:
Nothing with regards to harming Reagan or Bush... Like this wont harm Obama or Clinton.
Click to expand...
Like hell it didn't harm Reagan. A whole shit load of people on his staff were convicted of violating the law, including Olie North, tremendous damage was done to his administration and his reputation.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Like hell it didn't harm Reagan. A whole shit load of people on his staff were convicted of violating the law, including Olie North, tremendous damage was done to his administration and his reputation.
Click to expand...

It harmed Reagan's administration and some of his people. It did not stop him from serving out the remainder of his term and it did not prevent Bush from getting elected.
 
Jarod said:
It harmed Reagan's administration and some of his people. It did not stop him from serving out the remainder of his term and it did not prevent Bush from getting elected.
Click to expand...
Well that's because he had not actually crossed the line into knowingly breaking the law. In fact he was way smarter than Nixon on that score because if Reagan had obstructed or opposed the Iran Contra investigation he probably would have been impeached and had the Iran/Contra investigaters, whom Reagan cooperated fully with, found hard evidence that he had knowingly broken the law then he would have been impeached. Reagan came with in a gnats ass of crossing that line, so I don't believe that that did not have consequences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top