SC democrats elected an actual nobody

There's lots of weird shit about this election that makes it smell a little fishy, but the thing I keep coming back to is that there is no chance in hell that either candidate was going to beat DeMint. There's just no reason to commit a variety of felonies to protect a candidate that's a shoo-in. Now, if it turns out that DeMint gets down like S.C. governors and gubernatorial candidates and their are pictures of it or something, maybe I'll believe in a conspiracy.

For now, there's no motive to do it, unless of course, the purpose was to see if an election could be rigged and this was a small scale test for a larger endeavor.
 
too funny....the libs on this board are crying over this, yet, the dem party in SC UPHELD the vote because they couldn't find any fraud or wrongdoing
 
zoombwaz said:
South Carolina also has an open primary, meaning anybody can vote in the primary of their choice, regardless of party affiliation. They can only vote in one primary, either the Dem or Rep, but when you have the GOP nominee, Jim DeMint, basically unchallenged and knowing before the primary that he was going to cruise to an easy win. his supporters most likely simply waited until the Dem primary to vote...
Click to expand...

This is a highly questionable claim. Most Republicans who cared about the state of the South Carolina GOP were participating in the hotly contested gubernatorial primary.

The GOP primary attracted much more turnout. Probably more Dems voted in the GOP primary than Republicans voted in the Dems.
 
Yurt said:
too funny....the libs on this board are crying over this, yet, the dem party in SC UPHELD the vote because they couldn't find any fraud or wrongdoing
Click to expand...


I'm not crying over anything. In fact, I couldn't care less about the primary election where whomever were to run against DeMint was destined to lose.

There is enough weird shit involved in the primary, though, to warrant an investigation by election officials, not the Democratic Party.
 
NigelTufnel said:
I'm sure that if you think about for just a short while you'll manage to figure it out.
Click to expand...

You should explain it, since it's your assertion. I tried to imagine how a word describing a process to buff shoes is racist, but I'm not a retarded liberal race-baiter, so I need your help.

Explain your ridiculous statement, idiot
 
tinfoil said:
You should explain it, since it's your assertion. I tried to imagine how a word describing a process to buff shoes is racist, but I'm not a retarded liberal race-baiter, so I need your help.

Explain your ridiculous statement, idiot
Click to expand...


Go tell a black man that you could give him a good spit-shining and make him look like a polished lawyer and report back to me if you still have any questions.
 
spit_shine_521395.jpg


Spit%20Shine%20sign_medium.jpeg
 
NigelTufnel said:
I'm not crying over anything. In fact, I couldn't care less about the primary election where whomever were to run against DeMint was destined to lose.

There is enough weird shit involved in the primary, though, to warrant an investigation by election officials, not the Democratic Party.
Click to expand...

:crybaby:
 
NigelTufnel said:
Go tell a black man that you could give him a good spit-shining and make him look like a polished lawyer and report back to me if you still have any questions.
Click to expand...

Again, what does it have to do with a black man, you racist cock sucker?
http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/ht/spitshine.htm
Spit shining is a term for cleaning up spomething as to make it more presentable.

Are you asserting that black people take offense to such a term? How do you make such a blanket statement about a racial group and think you're making a point that others are the racists?

You are not sane
 
tinfoil said:
Again, what does it have to do with a black man, you racist cock sucker?
http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/ht/spitshine.htm
Spit shining is a term for cleaning up spomething as to make it more presentable.

Are you asserting that black people take offense to such a term? How do you make such a blanket statement about a racial group and think you're making a point that others are the racists?

You are not sane
Click to expand...


What does it have to do with a black man? Well, SM was talking about spit-shining a black man to make him presentable. I'm not sure how much more clear it could be.

And what I am asserting is that if you told a black man that you could spit-shine him to make him look like a polished lawyer there is a high likelihood that the black man would think you are a racist asshole and would kick your ass. Give it a try and let me know how it works out for you. Maybe I'm wrong.
 
NigelTufnel said:
What does it have to do with a black man? Well, SM was talking about spit-shining a black man to make him presentable. I'm not sure how much more clear it could be.

And what I am asserting is that if you told a black man that you could spit-shine him to make him look like a polished lawyer there is a high likelihood that the black man would think you are a racist asshole and would kick your ass. Give it a try and let me know how it works out for you. Maybe I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
You are the one making the accusation, and it is therefore your responsibility to prove it. Pussy.
 
NigelTufnel said:
What does it have to do with a black man? Well, SM was talking about spit-shining a black man to make him presentable. I'm not sure how much more clear it could be.

And what I am asserting is that if you told a black man that you could spit-shine him to make him look like a polished lawyer there is a high likelihood that the black man would think you are a racist asshole and would kick your ass. Give it a try and let me know how it works out for you. Maybe I'm wrong.
Click to expand...

You're the one who's injecting "black man" into it. He was refering to making Greene more desirable to voters. You're an asshole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top