Savita Halappanavar, a warning to the United States.

I don't think most on the right are calling for illegal abortions if the mother's life is at stake.
What medical condition requires the baby be dead upon his/her induction into the world in order to "save a mother's life?"

Name one.

All that is needed to ever save a mother is to induce labor, you don't have to kill the baby to get it out of the body.

This is very basic common sense.
 
What medical condition requires the baby be dead upon his/her induction into the world in order to "save a mother's life?"

Name one.

All that is needed to ever save a mother is to induce labor, you don't have to kill the baby to get it out of the body.

This is very basic common sense.

Inducing labor can kill both. Amazing you don't know basic biology.
 
What we want is for unborn babies not to be murdered, dummy.

In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will stop abortion in many states.

You do not give one flying FUCK about abortions.

What makes your little sticker peck out is you thinking you can describe Democrats as murderers and forcing women to carry their unwanted or dangerous pregnancies to full-term.

You like being able to control women don't you?

There is nowhere in the Constitution that describes a fetus as a living being or having any rights.

Leaving matters up to Fuckwads like you, women weren't even allowed to vote until 1920, and Black Women weren't even allowed to vote until 1965.

Well Women have the right of choice currently- SO FUCK OFF IF YOU DON'T LIKE WOMEN HAVING THAT FREEDOM!

It has nothing to do with men's decisions! It's their body NUMBSKULL!

Abortions are going to outlive you OLD FART. You'll die- Abortions will continue! Just so you will know!

AND WHAT A HILARIOUS AND PLEASANT THOUGHT! :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Each state will be able to decide what they want. In the few that may not allow any abortions, noting will stop the transfer of the mother to a state that does allow abortion to save the mother. . Most states will choose legal abortions to save the life of the mother rape and incest. Stop being hyperbolic. Let me ask you a question, if all states allowed abortions to save the lives of mothers, rape, and incest and nothing else would you then agree with that?
Nope. No Red state will allow this.

Some of these morons are already talking about prosecuting women who leave the state for an abortion.
 
fear mongering from a shit stain

we all have a right to life. women's rights don't exist - because all rights are equal - and based on the rights of an individual - be a male or female - the individual is who has rights

In this case, the right to life. The women and her Dr will always have an option to abort to save the pregnant individual that is at risk of dying.
 
Some time in early 2012 Savita Hapappanavar. a 31 year old dentist. became pregnant while a resident of Ireland. She and her husband were excited about welcoming a baby into their family.

Tragedy struck on October 21, 2012 Savita Halappanavar was experiencing abdominal pain and went to the hospital where Doctors concluded that a mischarge was unavoidable. The pain Mrs. Hapappanavar was experiencing was terrible, the Doctors explained to her that while she was sure to miscarry they could not perform a life saving abortion because the abortion law did not provide an exemption for a risk to the mothers life and it did not allow abortion at the stage of her pregnancy.

Three hours later Mrs. Halappanavar and her fetus were dead.



Is this what we want in the United States?

It's exactly what devolved Christian/Republican mutants want. These misogynists are lower than the parasites that eat the whale shit at the bottom of the Marianna trench.

I don't understand how civilized people are letting these women-haters, including the compliant Stepford Wives themselves, get away with it.
 
What concession? This is about a woman being dead just the way Republicans want. Please stay on topic or at least try to understand the OP. It isn't hard.
The OP claims the woman needed an abortion which is a lie -- all that was needed was to induce labor, which is done every day.

There is no medical condition which requires the baby be killed to "save the mother." You are entitled to your opinions but not the facts.
 
It will after the June Supreme Court release of the decision...in states that choose to stop it. Some states will still allow the murder of unborn infants.

Agreed. It will be the states, not the Supreme Court that choose to stop it. Most will not stop it completely and the court decision could have some guidelines. The MS case the court is hearing makes the limit 25 weeks which stops few abortions in that state since 96% are performed before that deadline.
 
The OP claims the woman needed an abortion which is a lie -- all that was needed was to induce labor, which is done every day.

There is no medical condition which requires the baby be killed to "save the mother." You are entitled to your opinions but not the facts.

Do you even know what a miscarriage is?
 
What medical condition requires the baby be dead upon his/her induction into the world in order to "save a mother's life?"

Name one.

All that is needed to ever save a mother is to induce labor, you don't have to kill the baby to get it out of the body.

This is very basic common sense.

What the fuck are you blathering about?

I said NOTHING about any of this and it is pure strawman.

Go waste someone else's time, troll.
 
What the fuck are you blathering about?

I said NOTHING about any of this and it is pure strawman.

Go waste someone else's time, troll.
This is what you wrote:

"I don't think most on the right are calling for illegal abortions if the mother's life is at stake."

There is no scenario in which killing the baby saves a pregnant woman's life.
 
Agreed. It will be the states, not the Supreme Court that choose to stop it. Most will not stop it completely and the court decision could have some guidelines. The MS case the court is hearing makes the limit 25 weeks which stops few abortions in that state since 96% are performed before that deadline.

I think you mean 15 weeks, contrast that with the norm in Europe of 12 weeks.
 
Some time in early 2012 Savita Hapappanavar. a 31 year old dentist. became pregnant while a resident of Ireland. She and her husband were excited about welcoming a baby into their family.

Tragedy struck on October 21, 2012 Savita Halappanavar was experiencing abdominal pain and went to the hospital where Doctors concluded that a mischarge was unavoidable. The pain Mrs. Hapappanavar was experiencing was terrible, the Doctors explained to her that while she was sure to miscarry they could not perform a life saving abortion because the abortion law did not provide an exemption for a risk to the mothers life and it did not allow abortion at the stage of her pregnancy.

Three hours later Mrs. Halappanavar and her fetus were dead.



Is this what we want in the United States?

Source or it didn't happen, deaths by child birth in the developed world are statistically zero thanks to widespread access to antibiotics and advanced medical treatment.

If we allow exemptions for the health of the mother (not mental health) will you support overturning Roe?
 
It's exactly what devolved Christian/Republican mutants want. These misogynists are lower than the parasites that eat the whale shit at the bottom of the Marianna trench.

I don't understand how civilized people are letting these women-haters, including the compliant Stepford Wives themselves, get away with it.

Infanticidal demon says what?
 
What concession? This is about a woman being dead just the way Republicans want. Please stay on topic or at least try to understand the OP. It isn't hard.
The op was about a woman that died in Ireland in 2012 Ireland has had a law allowing abortions for rape incest and to save the life of the mother since 1992
 
Back
Top