Sandwich Guy Found Not Guilty

M

martin

Well-known member
A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.

The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.

The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.



Gotta love the "point blank range".
 
martin said:
A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.

The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.

The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.



Gotta love the "point blank range".
Click to expand...
Justice prevails again!

This justice department has so much egg on its face, if we have a heat wave they will become an omelet,
 
martin said:
A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.

The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.

The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.



Gotta love the "point blank range".
Click to expand...
I'm thinking the guy just thought the ICE thug was hungry and was just feeding him lunch!
 
Jarod said:
Justice prevails again!

This justice department has so much egg on its face, if we have a heat wave they will become an omelet,
Click to expand...
It was interesting to read the tweets from those live tweeting the trial.

Basically, the jury was going to have to conclude that a sandwich thrown at a bullet proof vest could and would actually cause injury in order to convict.
 
Jarod said:
The Justice Department prosecuted a guy over a sandwich, they tried to get a felony indictment, and failed... then they tried to prosecute a misdemeanor and failed. They need to get a clue about political prosecutions.
Click to expand...
And if someone threw a sandwich at shut down schumer your shiy through your mouth. Go fuck yourself ass wipe
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I wouldn't demand they be charged with felony assault for throwing a sandwich.

I also wouldn't say that Schumer getting mustard on his suit coat is bodily harm.
Click to expand...
it is behavior we should be seeking to discourage, which is the point of enforcement. At least a fine was warranted

the shit stains wouldn't even agree to a misdemeanor
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
It was interesting to read the tweets from those live tweeting the trial.

Basically, the jury was going to have to conclude that a sandwich thrown at a bullet proof vest could and would actually cause injury in order to convict.
Click to expand...
I think for a group like the trump thugs who preach not being "woke" or "needing a safe space" crumble like little girls when someone throws a sandwich at them!
 
Yakuda said:
And if someone threw a sandwich at shut down schumer your shiy through your mouth. Go fuck yourself ass wipe
Click to expand...
Is his interpreter here? You're not making sense, Yagina.

I'd love it if someone threw a sandwich at Shumer. Maybe he'd grow a spine and do something other than writing angry letters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top