Sanders Pushes Back: ‘I Worked as Hard as I Could’ Hillary Clinton (Meet the Press)

Look up amoral and you see the Clintons. They are hands down the most dishonest hacks ever to set foot in DC. To pretend they are not the most corrupt individuals to ever hold and run for office is absurd. Just look at the clinton foundation.

Typical right-wing simpleton fake-news bullshit.

Just because you morons say it doesn't make it true.
 
You say we're deranged - but here you are STILL starting a few Hillary threads a week, and she lost & is out of power.

You'd be starting 5-10 threads a day if she was Prez. You'd literally be insane.

Perhaps if Hillary and her supporters (liars and immoral hypocrites) that believe there is nothing wrong with lying and criminal activity.....would stop pointing fingers and whining:) while attempting to make a profit from having a career of losing politics....THERE WOULD BE NO THREAD PER DAY. Just say'n.....
 
lol... Hillary continues to demand the spot light... because well... Its still 'her turn'. She 'did no wrong'. It's 'everyone else's fault'. blah blah blah.

How much spotlight has Hillary demanded in the past ten months? List some instances, not counting the book promotion.
 
Look up amoral and you see the Clintons. They are hands down the most dishonest hacks ever to set foot in DC. To pretend they are not the most corrupt individuals to ever hold and run for office is absurd. Just look at the clinton foundation.

Clinton foundation gets top marks from charity watchdogs. Not so much the so-called trump foundation... which I'm sure you'll be quick to defend.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?keyword_list=clinton+foundation&bay=search.results

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/clinton-foundation/478

"On September 13, 2016, it came to the attention of Charity Navigator that Donald J. Trump Foundation is the subject of an investigation by The New York Attorney General's Office, according to an article titled, "New York Attorney General to Investigate Donald Trump's Nonprofit." For this reason, we have issued a Moderate Concern CN Advisory. For more information, please see The New York Times article.


  • On November 22, 2016, The Washington Post published an article titled, "Trump Foundation admits to violating ban on 'self-dealing,' new filing to IRS shows." For more information, please see The Washington Post article.
  • On December 24, 2016, The Trump-Pence Transition Team issued a press release titled, "President-Elect Donald J. Trump Intends to Dissolve the Donald J. Trump Foundation." For more information, please see The Trump-Pence Transition Team press release.
  • On December 24, 2016, The Washington Post published an article titled, "Donald Trump plans to shut down his charitable foundation, which has been under scrutiny for months." For more information, please see The Washington Post article.

The nature of these allegations of illegal activity, improper conduct, or organizational mismanagement are such that Charity Navigator has issued this CN Advisory to provide donors with content that they may find useful when making their giving decisions. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors of sources used for the reported information, and not those of Charity Navigator. Charity Navigator is not responsible for the nature or content of the information presented through such external sources and websites. For more information on how or when we decide to publish a CN Advisory, please review our methodology.
 
Look up amoral and you see the Clintons. They are hands down the most dishonest hacks ever to set foot in DC. To pretend they are not the most corrupt individuals to ever hold and run for office is absurd. Just look at the clinton foundation.

Look up "anti-social personality disorder" and you see trump.
 
Look up amoral and you see the Clintons. They are hands down the most dishonest hacks ever to set foot in DC. To pretend they are not the most corrupt individuals to ever hold and run for office is absurd. Just look at the clinton foundation.

The Kennedys have been worse. They literally built their political empire on two organized criminal operations (black market liquor and a political machine). They cheated to get JFK into Congress, and then conspired to steal the 1960 election. They used their political power to keep Dead Kennedy in the Senate all of those years despite Chappaquiddick and the numerous sexual assaults. If they didn't have such bad karma, they would have become very powerful.

The Clintons only got into DC because of a douchebag named Ross Perot.
 
Over 3 thousand lawsuits from contractors who said Trump either short paid or didn't pay them for their work. There is plenty on how they fared after that on google - many lost their livelihoods because Trump commissioned them for so much work. Trump's defenders say "oh, all billionaires get sued"...but not like that, at all.

If you want to talk The Clinton Foundation, we can talk Trump U. Trump's whole career has been based on fraud & deceit.

I suppose it's a race to the bottom. I hope we never see the Clintons exert any influence in American politics again. But at least they HAVE done some good. I'm fairly convinced that the main reason Trump won't release tax returns isn't Russians or illegal doings. I think he gives almost nothing to charity. He is the most self-absorbed and self-interested person that we've ever had as President, by a few miles. And he is Machiavellian w/ that self-interest - anything goes as long as it gets him there.

When he gave his scripted comments yesterday at the UN he had to throw in a plug for his own real estate. Totally amoral and shameless.
 
Perhaps if Hillary and her supporters (liars and immoral hypocrites) that believe there is nothing wrong with lying and criminal activity.....would stop pointing fingers and whining:) while attempting to make a profit from having a career of losing politics....THERE WOULD BE NO THREAD PER DAY. Just say'n.....

Have you criticized the grifter-in-chief over his trump university scam?
 
Have you criticized the grifter-in-chief over his trump university scam?

Why? I did not vote or him. But.....where's the crime, the indictment, the sentence for a crime? If it truly was a crime worthy of prosecution would Mr. Trump not be serving time next to a real scam artist like the folks at Enron or Bernie Madoff?

Remember, Mr. Trump did not have the entire DOJ, the CIA, and the entire left wing congress defending and covering up for any wrong doing. If you have any criminal charges against the then TV reality star.....prosecute them. FYI: Trump did not write a book addressing why everyone else was to blame for his crimes and personal failures....just to keep himself in the spotlight...he did not have to, as Donald J. Trump is a demonstrable winner. He kicked your ass...no?
 
Why? I did not vote or him. But.....where's the crime, the indictment, the sentence for a crime. Remember, Mr. Trump did not have the entire DOJ, the CIA, and the entire left wing congress defending and covering up for any wrong doing. If you have any criminal charges against the then TV reality star.....prosecute them. FYI: Trump did not write a book addressing why everyone else was to blame for his crimes and personal failures.

I doubt you voted for Hillary either but that didn't stop you from criticizing her. And your supposition that half the government covered up for Hillary is just laughable.

Maybe you need your memory refreshed about the grifter.

Donald J. Trump has reversed course and agreed on Friday to pay $25 million to settle a series of lawsuits stemming from his defunct for-profit education venture, Trump University, finally putting to rest fraud allegations by former students, which have dogged him for years and hampered his presidential campaign...

It was a remarkable concession from a real estate mogul who derides legal settlements and has mocked fellow businessmen who agree to them. But the allegations in the case were highly unpleasant for Mr. Trump: Students paid up to $35,000 in tuition for a programs that, according to the testimony of former Trump University employees, used high-pressure sales tactics and employed unqualified instructors....

The agreement wraps together the outstanding Trump University litigation, including two federal class-action cases in San Diego, and a separate lawsuit by Eric T. Schneiderman, the New York attorney general. The complaints alleged that students were cheated out of thousands of dollars in tuition through deceptive claims about what they would learn and high-pressure sales tactics....

Documents made public through the litigation revealed that some former Trump University managers had given testimony about its unscrupulous and exploitative business practices. One sales executive testified that the operation was “a facade, a total lie.” Another manager called it a “fraudulent scheme.”

Other records showed how Mr. Trump had overstated the depth of his involvement in the programs. Despite claims that Mr. Trump had handpicked instructors, he acknowledged in testimony that he had not.

In addition to the financial rewards, the conclusion of the Trump University cases brings vindication to former students, mostly ordinary people across the country who felt they had been robbed of their savings by Mr. Trump, a successful businessman they respected and admired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/us/politics/trump-university.html?mcubz=0
 
I doubt you voted for Hillary either but that didn't stop you from criticizing her. And your supposition that half the government covered up for Hillary is just laughable.

Maybe you need your memory refreshed about the grifter.

Donald J. Trump has reversed course and agreed on Friday to pay $25 million to settle a series of lawsuits stemming from his defunct for-profit education venture, Trump University, finally putting to rest fraud allegations by former students, which have dogged him for years and hampered his presidential campaign...

It was a remarkable concession from a real estate mogul who derides legal settlements and has mocked fellow businessmen who agree to them. But the allegations in the case were highly unpleasant for Mr. Trump: Students paid up to $35,000 in tuition for a programs that, according to the testimony of former Trump University employees, used high-pressure sales tactics and employed unqualified instructors....

The agreement wraps together the outstanding Trump University litigation, including two federal class-action cases in San Diego, and a separate lawsuit by Eric T. Schneiderman, the New York attorney general. The complaints alleged that students were cheated out of thousands of dollars in tuition through deceptive claims about what they would learn and high-pressure sales tactics....

Documents made public through the litigation revealed that some former Trump University managers had given testimony about its unscrupulous and exploitative business practices. One sales executive testified that the operation was “a facade, a total lie.” Another manager called it a “fraudulent scheme.”

Other records showed how Mr. Trump had overstated the depth of his involvement in the programs. Despite claims that Mr. Trump had handpicked instructors, he acknowledged in testimony that he had not.

In addition to the financial rewards, the conclusion of the Trump University cases brings vindication to former students, mostly ordinary people across the country who felt they had been robbed of their savings by Mr. Trump, a successful businessman they respected and admired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/us/politics/trump-university.html?mcubz=0

What? Do think its immoral to criticize a documented LIAR, and INCOMPETENT (Benghazi) politician, and a documented enabler of deviant sexual behavior (BJ BILL) while she demonized the female victims of this sexual predator? If you do you are nothing but an Alinsky Democrat (radical social communist). Evil is as Evil does. A snake can be nothing but a snake regardless of how its attempted to be redefined.
 
What? Do think its immoral to criticize a documented LIAR, and INCOMPETENT (Benghazi) politician, and a documented enabler of deviant sexual behavior (BJ BILL) while she demonized the female victims of this sexual predator? If you do you are nothing but an Alinsky Democrat (radical social communist).

Good god. Have you criticized Melania for being a documented enabler of deviant sexual behaviour and abuse of women? You think it's immoral to criticize a documented and incompetent liar like trump just because he's not Hillary? If so you are just a stooge of the highest order. Nobody except right wingers give a crap about Alinsky, the guy who's been dead almost 50 years. Shows how weak your arguments are that you need to reach back to Hillary's college years.
 
You should step out on to your own side of the road & stop being so PC & like all your neighbors....... Be yourself.........:awesome:

i am self ,i have an undying fetish for self,self has done nothing to me,i stay in the road man.
the liberal left has lost it's way ,TRUMP WON 60% OF THE STATES,get over it.
 
Good god. Have you criticized Melania for being a documented enabler of deviant sexual behaviour and abuse of women? You think it's immoral to criticize a documented and incompetent liar like trump just because he's not Hillary? If so you are just a stooge of the highest order. Nobody except right wingers give a crap about Alinsky, the guy who's been dead almost 50 years. Shows how weak your arguments are that you need to reach back to Hillary's college years.


I believe in one thing. Objective, demonstrable truth based upon the testable and reproducible evidence in fact
I expect nothing more nor will I accept anything less. I simply enjoy the hell out of allowing the facts in evidence to refute 90% of the what the left claims as truth.


Of course, I am no personal critic of the current first lady as she was never attempting to obtain the highest office in the land as was the immoral Hillary. I do have my standards and my standards do not involve making fun of females in a hypocritical fashion simply because they happen to be married to a Commander in Chief that was described as a clown that would drop out of the race, never win the primary, and most certainly could never beat the Clinton political Machine who was propagandized to be a 90% lock on the office she failed to obtain simply because she declared the majority of Middle America to be "deplorable".

And of course its clear that no left winger "cares" about anyone on the right revealing the truth about the actual history of the democrat party and its current use of Alinsky politics. How would that make you look if you actually accepted the reality of HISTORY ACTUAL?

Of course I did belittle the Obama administration first lady as well as the Black Marxist that was placed into office because of his skin color....not because she was a female but because of her black marxist agenda and the content of her heart...as well as the actual history of her being a part of the Chicago criminal political machine and well as being tied directly to domestic terrorists. Has the current 1st lady ever been associated with a well known political machine like the Daily Machine in Chicago....or been tied to any association with known terrorists? Did the current first lady lie about pulling herself up out of poverty when it is objectively documented that she came from a well off middle class family?

But I suppose you could call the NY TIMES a right wing rag...IF, you had your head up your ass. :)

www.theobamafile.com/ObamaWife.htm
 
Last edited:
Of course not, I am no personal critic of the current first lady as she was never attempting to obtain the highest office in the land as was the immoral Hillary. I do have my standards and my standards do not involve making fun of females in a hypocritical fashion simply because they happen to be married to a Commander in Chief that was described as a clown that would drop out of the race, never win the primary, and most certainly could never beat the Clinton political Machine who was propagandized to be a 90% lock on the office she failed to obtain simply because she declared the majority of Middle America as "deplorable".

And of course its clear that no left winger "cares" about anyone on the right revealing the truth about the actual history of the democrat party and its current use of Alinsky politics. How would that make you look if you actually accepted the reality of HISTORY ACTUAL?

Of course I did belittle the Obama administration first lady as well as the Black Marxist that was placed into office of his skin color....not because she was a female but because of her black marxist agenda and the content of her heart...as well as the actual history of her being a part of the Chicago criminal political machine and well as being tied directly to domestic terrorists. Has the current 1st lady ever been associated with a well known political machine like the Daily Machine in Chicago....or been tied to any association with known terrorists? Did the current first lady lie about pulling herself up out of poverty when it is objectively documented that she came from a well off middle class family?

But I suppose you could call the NY TIMES a right wing rag...IF, you had your head up your ass. :)

www.theobamafile.com/ObamaWife.htm

So are you saying it's okay that Melania enables her deviant husband because at least she didn't run for office? I having trouble understanding your position because if it's wrong for Hillary then it's wrong for Melania, Marla, Ivana, Mrs. Vitter, Mrs. Craig and the rest.

Have you belittled the current first lady for living and working here illegally and then getting it covered up, having sexually-explicit conversations over the radio and modeling sexually-explicit soft porn? Somehow I doubt it.

Your lies about the Obamas are laughable. Obviously there's one reason and one reason only that you despise them and we both know what it is. And where is a quote by Michelle saying she pulled herself out of poverty?

I don't know what that non sequitur about the NYT refers to but it sure as heck isn't the obamafile you linked to.
 
So are you saying it's okay that Melania enables her deviant husband because at least she didn't run for office? I having trouble understanding your position because if it's wrong for Hillary then it's wrong for Melania, Marla, Ivana, Mrs. Vitter, Mrs. Craig and the rest.

Have you belittled the current first lady for living and working here illegally and then getting it covered up, having sexually-explicit conversations over the radio and modeling sexually-explicit soft porn? Somehow I doubt it.

Your lies about the Obamas are laughable. Obviously there's one reason and one reason only that you despise them and we both know what it is. And where is a quote by Michelle saying she pulled herself out of poverty?

I don't know what that non sequitur about the NYT refers to but it sure as heck isn't the obamafile you linked to.

I see you do have your head up your ass so far that you won't need a colonoscopy the rest of your life. Clearly you can't read or comprehend simple English. It was the DNC that promoted her as being a self made person pulling herself out of poverty. According to the Chicago Sun Times (what a shock) she pulled herself up out of poverty. www.eduinreview.com/blog/2008/10/michelle-obamas-college-record/ Simply present us any evidence that she has ever denied these fabricated stories....show where she as denied that she pulled herself up out of poverty.

And of course there was no RACISM involved called affirmative action. As I said, I deal in truth, not idiocy. Now get your head out your ass and learn to read and comprehend simple English.
 
Back
Top