sanctuary city richmond case thrown out out out

Rune said:
Already answered too many times but pay attention;
Under the Anti- Commandeering Clause of the 10th, the cities or states cannot be compelled...via withholding of funds...to do the work of Federal angencies.
Since immigration in entirely a Federal purview, the clear and obvious answer is no.
Click to expand...

so the feds cannot withhold funding from sanctuary cities, but they can withhold funding for seat belts?
 
I thought it was great, when the Sheriff here ran her mouth and ICE swarmed this place and has not left.
The going rate for construction help has increased back to 1990 pricing. I'm getting more and more offers to get back into the trades. Ya, a white boy.
 
Rune said:
Correct.
Click to expand...

u lie

In late July, the administration announced that recipients of Justice Department grant money aimed at supporting local law enforcement must give ICE agents access to local jails, provide at least 48 hours’ notice ahead of the release of undocumented inmates of interest, and eliminate restrictions on the sharing of local immigration status information with the federal government.

San Francisco filed a lawsuit that got a federal judge to temporarily block Trump’s threatened cuts to funding.

Chicago sued Attorney General Jeff Sessions over his threat to withhold federal grant money.

The mayor of Miami-Dade County ordered the city’s jails to comply with federal requests going forward.



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-debt-ceiling-mess-on-gop-leaders-in-congress

so when the courtz rule we will see if the $ can be with held or not

itz a lie to say the feds cannot with hold the $ until those suits are heard and ruled on
 
I condemn racists & Nazis said:
u lie

In late July, the administration announced that recipients of Justice Department grant money aimed at supporting local law enforcement must give ICE agents access to local jails, provide at least 48 hours’ notice ahead of the release of undocumented inmates of interest, and eliminate restrictions on the sharing of local immigration status information with the federal government.

San Francisco filed a lawsuit that got a federal judge to temporarily block Trump’s threatened cuts to funding.

Chicago sued Attorney General Jeff Sessions over his threat to withhold federal grant money.

The mayor of Miami-Dade County ordered the city’s jails to comply with federal requests going forward.



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-debt-ceiling-mess-on-gop-leaders-in-congress

so when the courtz rule we will see if the $ can be with held or not

itz a lie to say the feds cannot with hold the $ until those suits are heard and ruled on
Click to expand...

It is the Bill of Rights Dumbfuck
 
archives said:
You conservatives are delusional, any action the President's team takes will be tied up in the Courts for years, and just like his other photo op decisions will be removed by the stroke of a pen in three years
Click to expand...

By who, Hillary? LOLZ
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no wonder we're so fucked as a divided nation, you idiots care nothing about consistency in your constitutional interpretations, only about what you want it to be.
Click to expand...

South Dakota v Dole, moron. I guess if what "you want it to be" includes SCOTUS, you may be correct.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
did SCOTUS get dred scott right? Heller or McDonald?
Click to expand...

lol

We've been down this road multiple times, dumbshit, and you got your ass handed to you every time. Why do you insist on further humiliation?

Taken that peashooter of yours to the courthouse yet, pussy? I thought not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top