San Francisco teacher sparks outrage with disturbing tweets

lib'rul rumors of rape brought by Demmycrats against Republican candidates are a dime a dozen.......but amazingly, after the election is over these unnamed accusers evaporate.....

How about a little lap dance from a child who happens to be your daughter? All good with that?

cache.php
 
trump is only real populist candidate in america.

he's the only one rejecting globalist fanaticism and deep state lies.

And replacing that with Trump fanaticism and Trump lies, while fleecing his derps and the country while in power.
 
And replacing that with Trump fanaticism and Trump lies, while fleecing his derps and the country while in power.

what does trump fanaticism look like?

enforced borders and tariffs?

sign me up.

all americans want to be signed up for that.
:truestory:
 
Have you not considered that you yourself have overlooked key evidence that Trump forcefully raped a 13 year old girl and has done other innapropriate things with young females?

no one has ever claimed Trump raped a 13 year old girl or done inappropriate things with other young females....
 
My goodness you're a dumbass motherfucker aren't you? Take a moment and see if you can think about why I said that.

Phoenyx may be stupid, (can't spell) I don't know. But it is definitely sick. We said that the grooming by the leftist teachers would lead to attempts to normalize pedophilia - and here we are.
 
PEDOPHILIA IS FINE AS LONG AS YOU SAY YOU LOVE THE CHILD YOU ARE FUCKING AND WANT TO MARRY THEM!



Can't make this shit up when it comes to derps.

As a leftist - you have no integrity.

Pedophilia is sex with a prepubescent child. Nevada allows 16 year olds to marry - which is NOT pedophilia. AND you of the left would let/push 5 year olds to undergo gender mutilation.
 
Should doing "some good things" balance out rape and sexual misconduct? Mussolini is credited with making the Italian trains run on time...no small feat in Italy.

Ah Douche - you pathological fucking liar.

The is no lie - no matter how thoroughly debunked - that you won't tell to slander enemies of your Reich.

You truly are a vile cunt. No honor, no integrity - no worth to the universe.
 
When are you going to divorce yourself from the United States, Fredo? Have you done so already?

When are you, Douche?

Or are you a CCP troll?

Nah, you're Truthy's sock.

No way there can be TWO people with an IQ under 50, who are pathological liars, have a 4th grade education, and are utterly without honor....
 
Lol. Priests molest kids every day and you want to accuse all liberals of pedophilia over some random teacher's tweet. Get real. Maybe fix your own house and put some priests behind bars before pointing fingers.
 
Ah Douche - you pathological fucking liar.

The is no lie - no matter how thoroughly debunked - that you won't tell to slander enemies of your Reich.

You truly are a vile cunt. No honor, no integrity - no worth to the universe.

Socks like you know a lot about liars, doncha? LOL

You have no honor. You know it and I know it. Now the point is to prove to everyone else what you and I know. :)
 
A San Francisco Bay area teacher went viral on Twitter last weekend after posting a lengthy thread arguing that sex between a child and an adult is not “intrinsically harmful.” Zara Degeneres, a self-described “pagan witch,” faced widespread condemnation from parents. According to her LinkedIn page, she specializes in “teaching sex-positive values to middle and high school students through sex education.

She argued that child-adult sex is only “inappropriate” because of outdated Christian morals. According to the “sex educator,” children are only harmed because of the guilt and shame imposed by “highly religious parents.” Degeneres said she believes that children are fully capable of consenting to sex with adults.


https://floridajolt.com/san-francis...g-tweets-in-support-of-inappropriate-conduct/

This is today's Lib teacher!

This is the "slippery slope" leftists told us would never happen. Leftists are subhuman pieces of shit. Thats what's reaching kids in San fransicko

You say this, and yet you also said:

**
He can't help who he loves. If the person is old enough to decide their gender they are old enough to decide to have sex. Who the fuck are you to decide for other people?
**

Source:
How young is "significantly younger" than 17? , Post #11

I guess it's alright so long as they generally have rightist values?

Sacasm escapes you.

He wasn't being sarcastic, you illiterate pile of horse shit.

After EL's comment, I surmised they were correct that Yakuda was being sarcastic, but perhaps Yakuda could help resolve this.
 
As to Matt Gaetz, I think he's done some good things. [snip]

Should doing "some good things" balance out rape and sexual misconduct?

As far as I know, Gaetz has never been accused of forcefully raping anyone. I'm guessing you're referring to the allegation that he had sex with a 17 year old female. He denies the allegation, but even if the allegation is true, the fact of the matter is that the age of consent is 18 in only 11 states in the U.S. The age of consent in the rest is 16 or 17, barring special circumstances such as close age proximity or marriage:

https://www.ageofconsent.net/states
 
I do indeed support Quebec having the right to vote to leave Canada. I'm also glad that in both referendums that they had on the matter, they voted to stay with Canada. I strongly suspect the reason they chose that is that, unlike Ukraine, Canada supported Quebec's rights to keep using their local language of French in government offices.

So you'd be fine if the Western provinces chose to become US States?

If they held referendums and decided that's what they wanted to do, sure.
 
I disagree. I think Bernie did a better job. And I've seen no evidence that Bernie's ever behaved innapropriately with females of any age either.

and bernies was backstabbed by the clinton machine inside the democratic party.

Agreed.

the actual populists, bernies bros as they were called, went to trump.

h. a. goodman.

I know that some of them did. I think the majority didn't. What do you mean by h. a. goodman?
 
I support eastern Ukrainians choosing the government they wish to be run by.

They did that when they elected Zelenskyy.

The last elections that those in the Donbass region had prior to Russia's referendums there was when the people there held referendums on whether they should have more autonomy from the Ukrainian government. This, despite Putin discouraging them from doing so. They voted in the affirmative. Ukraine decided that the "solution" was to send in the army. That resulted in 8 years of civil war. Ukraine did not hold elections in the Donbass region- they were too busy bombing it. I suspect you're unaware of just how bad things got prior to Zelensky coming to power. Here's a speech given by the Ukrainian President that was in power prior to Zelensky around 8 years ago:



If the elections Russia ran in eastern Ukraine are legitimate, they chose to be part of Russia.

But they're not legitimate.

The UN didn't recognize them as legitimate.

The fact that the UN didn't recognize them as legitimate doesn't mean they weren't legitimate. Russia held elections in parts of 4 Ukrainian regions. I know that in one of them, Donetsk, there were international reporters who monitored the situation and even interviewed people on the street prior to the referendums. It seemed clear from what I saw there that the people generally wanted to join Russia. As to the referendums in general, Eva Bartlett, a journalist I find to be trustworthy, linked to the following article on them:

The Narrative of Sham Elections | The Postil Magazine


By Russia's own admission they didn't poll all the people who live there.

Stands to reason, considering the referendums were being held in a warzone.

I bet that if you polled only the Israelis who lived in the WB and E Jerusalem, they would vote to join Israel too.

There is no Israeli/Palestinian divide in Ukraine. Instead, there is a western Ukrainian/eastern Ukrainian divide. Eastern Ukraine has by and large had more ethnic Russians and Russian speakers in it. Russia has focused pretty much all its efforts in taking eastern Ukraine. Part of this region, the Donbass, separated from Ukraine 8 years ago and western Ukraine's been trying to take it back ever since. It stands to reason that said region would want to join Russia if only to get help in defending themselves against the western Ukrainian aggressors. There is more than that as well, such as the cultural and language ties that eastern Ukrainians have with Russia.

Also, that "referendum" was against Ukrainian law, wasn't administered by Ukraine, and had nothing to do with the Ukrainian government or any international body.

Ofcourse the Kyiv based Ukrainian government wouldn't approve of it. They've been trying to take back the Donbass region for 8 years now, by force. I think Frank Herbert, a former journalist and science fiction writer, was on point when he spoke of the law:

**
Law always chooses sides on the basis of enforcement power. Morality and legal niceties have little to do with it when the real question is: Who has the clout?
**

For 8 years, Russia tried to find a diplomatic solution to the suffering of eastern Ukrainians. They finally decided that the only way to resolve the situation was through force.
 
I do indeed support Quebec having the right to vote to leave Canada. I'm also glad that in both referendums that they had on the matter, they voted to stay with Canada. I strongly suspect the reason they chose that is that, unlike Ukraine, Canada supported Quebec's rights to keep using their local language of French in government offices.

The "referendum" in Ukraine was not legitimate according to the UN.

I trust reporters like Eva Bartlett far more than the UN.

If you think it was, then you must also agree that Israel has the right to annex the West Bank and Gaza because of all the same excuses Russia uses with Ukraine

No I don't, just as Eva Bartlett doesn't. Russia's military operation has mainly taken over areas that were opposed to the Kyiv based Ukrainian government. The equivalent would be if Egypt or Jordon started taking over areas in the west bank or Gaza, as like the Palestinians, they are also predominantly muslims and opposed to Israel controlling these regions.
 
Sure ya do!

You blame them for corrupting society.

You say they are going to "replace us".

You say that the rich ones control everything.

Did you just forget everything you've been saying and supporting the last 7 years????




So at what point during the 40 years wandering around the desert did the Israelites set up a stock exchange?

Shut the fuck up, you lying imbecile.
 
Back
Top