Sadly,.. this is only the beginning.

I have presented it. You do not consider it evidence. I do. You are the one that is stupid enough to say there was no fraud, not me.

gee, why didn't Trump's lawyers show it in courts. They went to court 60 times and showed none. Did their dogs eat it? Why didn't Trump show it when he spoke?
There is none. You do not have access to double-secret fraud that the right-wing world has been begging for. You just believe.
 
gee, why didn't Trump's lawyers show it in courts. They went to court 60 times and showed none. Did their dogs eat it? Why didn't Trump show it when he spoke?
There is none. You do not have access to double-secret fraud that the right-wing world has been begging for. You just believe.

They did not show it in court because they were not permitted to. What part of that don't you understand? Also they have not been permitted to discover evidence as the machines and ballots are withheld. Why can't those things be examined? Our courts are shitting all over them.
 
I have presented it. You do not consider it evidence. I do. You are the one that is stupid enough to say there was no fraud, not me.

The courts don’t consider it evidence they are not suppressing it they are dismissing it because it’s pure unadulterated bullshit. If you don’t like the decision of the court hit the bricks traitor.
 
The courts don’t consider it evidence they are not suppressing it they are dismissing it because it’s pure unadulterated bullshit. If you don’t like the decision of the court hit the bricks traitor.

Sadly for many trump fans evidence isn't something to be concerned about, trump said is all the truth they need......

Sadly coldjoint is probably an adult but you'd never know that by what he says & how he thinks.....
 
The courts don’t consider it evidence they are not suppressing it they are dismissing it because it’s pure unadulterated bullshit. If you don’t like the decision of the court hit the bricks traitor.


50+ Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing
What part of that don't you understand? It means no evidence was presented. Stop your fucking lying. Admit the election was stolen and you hope the cover up and purge work. Any good Commie would.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
 
What part of that don't you understand? It means no evidence was presented. Stop your fucking lying. Admit the election was stolen and you hope the cover up and purge work. Any good Commie would.
https://hereistheevidence.com/

I guess we shouldn't believe the 50+ judges & courts, several of which were appointed by trump & instead believe the anti-vac anonymous nut case poZing on the internet...:evilnod:
 
2. The Court or Election Board's response:

FL Presidential 2000:EVIDENTIARY HEARING

MO 78th District 2016:EVIDENTIARY HEARING


NC 9th District 2018:EVIDENTIARY HEARING


NY 22nd District 2020:EVIDENTIARY HEARING


GA Presidential 2020:NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING



MI Presidential 2020:NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING


PA Presidential 2020:NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING




See a pattern there. Stop lying, the courts never permitted any evidence.
 

See a pattern there. Stop lying, the courts never permitted any evidence.
You see a pattern here?? pls read it out loud to the class
BlotTest.gif
 
You think stealing an election is the right thing to do, even funny. I wonder what even makes you worth replying to. I don't wonder anymore. Nothing does.

No, & when it happens I will be one of the first to complain about it.....

Because you & a bunch of conspiracy nuts dug yourself into a ditch of delusion don't blame the rest of us here in the real world...........

There was no plot to steal trump's election, it was a land slide & he lost............ THere is no easter bunny & no, santa isn't real either, grow up before it's to late..
 
What part of that don't you understand? It means no evidence was presented. Stop your fucking lying. Admit the election was stolen and you hope the cover up and purge work. Any good Commie would.
https://hereistheevidence.com/

Keep your day job. Courts decide there will be no evidentiary hearing after they EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE in the pleading to decide if it warrants a hearing. Every single court found the evidence lacking, or found that the plaintiff did not have standing. That would be FIFTY COURTS that looked at what you had and called bullshit. You claim was also bullshit. The evidence could have been presented to the court of public opinion. In fact it was, and we laughed it out of court too. Because you have NOTHING. Speculation, innuendo, massive conspiracy theories, debunked videos, lying witnesses. None of the is 'evidence'. REJECTED. Bye traitor.
 
Keep your day job. Courts decide there will be no evidentiary hearing after they EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE in the pleading to decide if it warrants a hearing. Every single court found the evidence lacking, or found that the plaintiff did not have standing. That would be FIFTY COURTS that looked at what you had and called bullshit. You claim was also bullshit. The evidence could have been presented to the court of public opinion. In fact it was, and we laughed it out of court too. Because you have NOTHING. Speculation, innuendo, massive conspiracy theories, debunked videos, lying witnesses. None of the is 'evidence'. REJECTED. Bye traitor.

Another disingenuous lying post. The evidence never saw the light of day on any network. Challenging an election is not treason, it is a right, you idiot.
 
Last edited:
Another disingenuous lying post. The evidence never saw the light of day on any network. Challenging an election is not treason it is a right, you idiot.

If the evidence never 'saw the light of day' how the FUCK do you know about. God you are dumb. It's just sublime.
 
Back
Top