This is true, but panicking over one company's ratings while the others still list the US as AAA for the foreseeable future is a bit much. It is absolutely not time to panic, especially when the company is one that has been so terribly wrong on important calls in the very near past. We shouldn't ignore the fact that they had their numbers wrong by a large margin then changed justification in mid-stream to meet what they had already decided on poor information.
We need to get the BBA passed and ratified, we can forestall a downgrade by more responsible companies, and have time to look in to the rather liquid nature of the justifications for this rating by this company all at once.
Basically, in large friendly letters on the cover we should be seeing, "Don't Panic!"
Moody's is set to follow suit today-or so it is being rumored. Can you really see the Obama admin. moving quickly to pass a BBA?
We should just believe them without question... How's your ENRON stock going for ya?
They aren't the messenger, they set the rating. In this case they based it on spurious findings and when caught in error they simply changed their justification to match what they wanted to say. It didn't matter how far they were off it was "negligible"...
Personally I agree with Damo, this company does not have much of a track record.
Not today, they warned that if we don't do something by 2013 they "may follow"... And the Obama Admin would have nothing to do with a BBA, the states ratify it, it never reaches the President's desk. Which is important considering he doesn't believe that Constitutional limitation is necessary to ensure that he'll do his job.
Moody's warning: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/08/us-usa-ratings-moodys-idUSTRE77713K20110808
I wouldn't buy a piece of shit like Enron, with all the agencies reommending them. so fuck off
Thanks for the link~ What I meant by the admin moving quickly was in supposing he wanted one and would move to encourage (sell) the proposition.
The flight to Treasuries continues unabated, regardless of what the S&P says:
![]()
All this BBA nonsense is classic "now more than ever"ism. And, for the record, I love how the Republicans went from "not raising the debt ceiling is no big deal" to "S&P downgrade? I'm moving to Panama!" in record time. Hilarious.
S&P listed them as AAA right up until they sank into the ether.... You might want to pay attention to somebody with a better record than S&P on something like this.
Interesting links. There is one offshore loophole for FOREIGN insurance companies in Massachusetts alone that exceeds $30 billion a year. And that is one of hundreds.
As I said, I'm not here to educate you & DY about loopholes. Personally, I don't think you should be taking part in discussions about economics if you don't know they exist, and they they are all in the "imagination."
But hey - that's just me...
Really.....Did you fail to notice that I"M the one that posted actual links......and not you.....you might have missed that.....
Again with the "We have crippling debt in our house, but we've got another credit card with a low rate! That will fix things!" argument. Just quit it.. You are embarrassing yourself.
I'm simply pointing out that investors don't give a shit about the S&P rating. If they did, Treasury rates would be the rise, not dropping.
And we don't have crippling debt. Just saying it over and over and over again doesn't make it so.
Moody's is threatening to downgrade US rating also.....I'm simply pointing out that investors don't give a shit about the S&P rating. If they did, Treasury rates would be the rise, not dropping.
And we don't have crippling debt. Just saying it over and over and over again doesn't make it so.
Saying that we aren't on the road to crippling debt doesn't make it so and directly ignores reality.
Avoiding that destination is my goal, apparently you think that it can't possibly matter. We absolutely disagree.