Ruth Badder Ginsburg to Retire?
- Thread starter Red Crow
- Start date
Why does she need to retire?
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Wrong again, liar.
You're just making flimsy excuses because I called you out over your lie about the RBG videos.
You're an obsessed, weirdo who can't let go of your fixation, so you keep on creating bullshit reasons to bring it up whenever you get one of your uncontrollable urges.
No wonder everybody pities you.
The next stop for you is at the top of my ignore list.
You have truly gone beyond boring to mind numbingly monotonous.
Thinks geriatrics are fine staying on the court until they drop dead.
I'm certainly open to the idea that an elderly person has lost the mental capacity for demanding work. Just look at Trump. He's a deranged old man who has trouble holding a thought in his head from the beginning of a sentence to the end. If Ginsburg were to start to rant and prattle the way he does, I could see the argument that it's time for her to go. But she appears to still communicate at a high level, so I don't see a reason to think her mind has gone the way Trump's has, do you?
You're not "open" to anything that doesn't already fit your narrow loony leftist political ideology.
There you go again with the false, stupid TDS memes. You leftist dumbfucks can't help yourselves can you?
There you go again with the false, stupid TDS memes. You leftist dumbfucks can't help yourselves can you?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Ginsburg could bury anyone on this forum in any debate about the law, the Constitution, history or politics without breaking a sweat.
Thank God she works out and keeps in good physical shape so that she can remain on the bench for the foreseeable future.
She needs to set up a trip to the same hotel visited by Judge Scalia.....allow Brennan to be the travel agent as I hear they have a great rate for death while sleeping plan.....with a guaranteed no "autopsy" for a few bucks more.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I would personally destroy her in debate here, if she could ever muster up the courage. She'd have to be on oxygen after just one or two posts.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
If you care to check your assumptions, take a look at a transcript of an interview with Ginsburg versus one with Trump. Here's the first entry Google brings up for each linking to a 2018 interview transcript:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/cnb...nald-trump-sits-down-with-cnbcs-joe-kern.html
https://forward.com/opinion/393687/jane-eisner-interviews-ruth-bader-ginsburg-transcript/
Compare the syntax of each. Here's the first lengthy comment from Trump in his interview:
"Ivanka is very much involved, and she’s been involved. We have tremendous numbers of people who really are phenomenal in every way, but they’re not trained, and they’re not qualified to take some of the jobs. You report on it all of the time. All of the companies that are pouring back into our country. So we have Chrysler... we have so many companies. And we have companies expanding. Look at what’s happening with Apple, where they’re going to be spending $350 billion, and I can go on and on. And we need people with skill. We need people who are trained. It’s much different than it was 30 years ago and 40 years ago. We need people that can go out there and do it, and that’s exactly what we’re doing. And in front of you is a list that’s going to create almost 4 million jobs. These are a list of companies. They’ll be creating a tremendous number of jobs, and they’re going to be skill jobs. And these are people that will be trained, really trained and trained well."
The first sentence is gibberish. The second is self-contradictory (those people are phenomenal in every way but untrained and unqualified). Then there's a series of aborted sentences and half thoughts, as well as vague assertions "We need people that can go out there and do it, and that’s exactly what we’re doing." The grammar is excruciating ("these are a list of companies") and the whole thing collapses into verbal diarrhea ("And these are people that will be trained, really trained and trained well.")
He sounds like a mentally debilitated old man, who can't remember what particular policy he was trying to speak in favor of, so he just babbles until he thinks he's filled enough time.
Now compare to Ginsburg. Here's her first lengthy comment:
"Perhaps I should start by saying, I grew up in the shadow of World War II. And we came to know more and more what was happening to the Jews in Europe. The sense of being an outsider — of being one of the people who had suffered oppression for no … no sensible reason … it’s the sense of being part of a minority. It makes you more empathetic to other people who are not insiders, who are outsiders."
That's exactly the way you expect a highly educated and thoughtful person in possession of her faculties to communicate orally.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Only because she'd be laughing at you so hard.
I hope she can hold out a little longer. As bright as she sounds, she looks like crap. I know she's supposed to work out hard and all, but looking at her in that interview, she looks every bit her age, even if she continues to speak brilliantly.
Getin the ring
Verified User
are you on medication?
describe your medication to us,
are they little white pills
No. Why do you ask?
