moon
Satire for Sanity
All of them. Same in the US- no cities left. After a few weeks- no radiation survivors either. No point in you leaving a will.
Russians have ' lowered the bar ' for nuclear weapons usage.
- Thread starter moon
- Start date
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
So basically you're saying that if the West doesn't allow Russia to annex Ukraine Putin will initiate the total destruction of humanity.
Sounds reasonable.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Pretty much the same scenario as Israel fomenting WW3 if it isn't allowed annex Palestine. The US backs the latter- Russia and China back the former.
No red lines.
The West should not tell us it is another red line or a message to it. We are sending no signals to anyone. Time is ripe for practical actions.
Right to nuclear retaliation is no message to the West
The key factor of the updated doctrine is that Russia retains the right for a retaliatory nuclear strike in response to an aggression with conventional forces and arms against it, Igor Korotchenko stated
tass.com
Sounds just like Netanyahu.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
NATO's new Secretary General responds to Putin's nuclear threats, claims they should not make concessions
Details: Although Putin's remarks are hardly novel, the Secretary General pointed out that they are still only words.Quote: "Naturally, the Kremlin regularly issues threats, and this language is careless and irresponsible. However, I must also state unequivocally that there is no immediate threat of nuclear weapons being used. That's all I have to say about the way things are right now.
Allow him to talk of his nuclear arsenal; after all, that is what he wants us to discuss. We shouldn't do it, in my opinion. The fact that there is no threat of nuclear war at this moment should be our main concern."
Details: Rutte went on to say that this will set a terrible precedent if nations start caving in to Putin's threats on a regular basis.