That's actually a best practice.
Yeah, real fucking practical.
That's actually a best practice.
I would imagine that their intranet would be firewalled off from the internet and access only allowed from designated devices. The laptop in question undoubtedly had internet but no intranet access.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
It's a right handy way to take the focus off of his failure.
Gotta disagree with you here son. If we're talking about that laptop in the first place I guarantee the switches would allow it in.
Why? I worked for any years at T-Mobile as a networking engineer. Any well run security minded company would have different layers of security and levels of access.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
I would imagine that their intranet would be firewalled off from the internet and access only allowed from designated devices. The laptop in question undoubtedly had internet but no intranet access.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Really Mr. T-Mobile? Why do you think a foreign agency would target a specific laptop? Break it down for me all scientific like.
A good place to start is to read up about the 3 layer heirarchical model as defined by Cisco.
http://www.tech-faq.com/understanding-the-cisco-three-layer-hierarchical-model.html
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
What does that mean? Do you mean the intranet, if so yes I'm sure that it can. However an enterprise wide intranet will typically be set up to allow different levels of access as already stated. For instance, HR or customer service are likely to be barred access to key functions like the electricity grid. That would most likely be accessible by technical support staff only.Once again, gotta disagree. I bet it could connect to the network which is why it was targeted in the first place.
What does that mean? Do you mean the intranet, if so yes I'm sure that it can. However an enterprise wide intranet will typically be set up to allow different levels of access as already stated. For instance, HR or customer service are likely to be barred access to key functions like the electricity grid. That would most likely be accessible by technical support staff only.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
OK, does Cisco explain anywhere why you would want to target a machine that will never connect to your intended target?
Well unless you had insider knowledge how would you know what level of access a particular device had in advance? You would only know that by trying it and seeing how far you got before being barred access to servers on a particular VLAN or subnet.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Intranet is not something I just made up, it is a general term for an internal network. It is clear that you only have a hazy and sketchy understanding of IP addressing schemes.Actually no, I don't mean the "Intranet" as you keep calling it. By the way, that's a dead giveaway. What I'm talking about is most accurately referred to as a subnet.
WaPo retracts fake news.
How are they still in business ?
Are you using Iridium or Inmarsat?Alright Milagro and Guille you network geniuses. All I want to know is why when I am at sea on satellite I have zero problems with connections but when I come ashore my phone gives me some round swirling thingy and drops calls.
WaPo retracts fake news.
How are they still in business ?
WaPo retracts fake news.
How are they still in business ?
Are you using Iridium or Inmarsat?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk