Russia WILL lose and it will be a catastrophe for Putin

serendipity

Verified User
.

Retired General Ben Hodges predicts that 2023 may see the ignominious - and politically catastrophic - defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia will lose the war against Ukraine, possibly by the end of this year, the former head of the United States Army in Europe has told the Daily Express. Speaking from Frankfurt ahead of Friday's year-long anniversary of the conflict, retired General Ben Hodges predicted that 2023 may well conclude in ignominious - and politically catastrophic - defeat for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Absolutely I can see Russia losing this war. They are going to lose. This new offensive is going to culminate where the attacking forces run out of impetus, there is a loss of will and growing logistical problems. And that’s going to happen by late Spring. You have to remember Russia is already running out of supplies of ammunition,” Gen Hodges said.

“And the Russian military leaders now all hate each other and are barking at one another, which does not create a platform for a command structure.”

The seasoned ex-commander said the latest Russian recruits being sent to the frontline for a new offensive were ‘undertrained and underprepared” and were being “sent to the meat grinder”.

And Gen Hodges added: “I see no other outcome but a Russian defeat.

“It’s too early to plan a victory parade in Kyiv but all the momentum is with Ukraine now and there is no doubt in my mind that they will win this war, probably in 2023.

“I predict President Putin will next lose the Battle of Crimea, the decisive phase of the Campaign, in the coming Summer. And then he loses the coming internal Battle of the Kremlin before the end of the year.”

But he stressed: “We must not be scared of Ukraine winning. Once Ukraine has bridged Crimea, which is possible this year, I think there will be some significant changes in Russia.”

The view of Putin’s imminent demise was shared by a number of other world experts on Russian military affairs who spoke to the paper on today’s year-long anniversary of the invasion.

The former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove agreed that the leader of Russia is now extremely vulnerable as the conflict goes from bad to worse.

“This is a conflict that Putin politically in Russia cannot afford to lose,” he said.

“So, if he does lose, and I think one would have to reflect on what loss means in this particular case, then I think his political future is probably over, finished.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1738785/Russia-ukraine-war-anniversary-putin-health
 
This is a great place to remember that America has not won a war in about 80 years, with near constant warring. Also that we have spent 25 years wrecking the officer corps.
 
Defense Journal by Atlantic Council IN TURKEY (DJ): How would you characterize Turkey’s role in and contributions to NATO’s warfighting capabilities?
Frederick Benjamin “Ben” Hodges III (FBH): Turkey has delivered everything it was asked for in NATO missions, and has always been there when called. It met every manning requirement with high-quality officers, and has provided professional, competent, and reliable forces to NATO missions. The equipment was top shelf, with impressive modernization projects in a number of areas. One memory that stands out was watching the Turkish Land Forces’ EFES joint combined arms live fire exercise (CALFEX). The drill involved over thirty Turkish Navy vessels, fixed and rotary wing aviation, paratroopers, engineers. It was among the best large-scale joint live fire exercises I have seen. Now, several years later, the Turkish military also has a large number of troops with recent combat experience, making it an even more formidable component of NATO’s defense array.

DJ: Has the Ukraine war changed Western perceptions of the relevance of combat-ready NATO forces?
FBH: Yes, but things really started changing before this year. The 2016 NATO Summit in Warsaw brought the Enhanced Forward Presence initiative, forming land forces’ battle groups and bringing an armored-division worth of US equipment back to Europe. The Madrid Summit laid out very clear missions for deterrence and warfighting, both conventional and nuclear. Russia’s willingness to use a variety of missile systems against populated areas in Ukraine has been an eye-opener, as NATO realized a need for air defense capabilities—not just for military targets but for hundreds of densely populated urban areas across Europe. The rate of Russian military expenditure of artillery and precision-guided munitions has demonstrated that US and European industry need to pick up the pace as well. Our [United States] training scenarios have been refocused back to conventional warfighting, with some de-emphasis on counterterrorism.

Turkey’s role in NATO’s conventional defense is significant. It has commitments under a number of warfighting operational plans that it is prepared to fulfill. The excellent work of Turkish forces serving as the 2021 Very High Readiness Joint Task Force shows its ability to do so.

DJ: Black Sea security is a rising concern for the United States and for NATO. Can you say a little more about Turkey’s role in the Black Sea?
FBH: The United States has erred in the past by viewing countries on the Black Sea littoral as individual islands rather than as a strategic system of sorts, leading to missed opportunities. There has been a mismatch between policy and regional strategy. We [The United States] have to do a better job of investing in a manner that integrates and strengthens our [The United States] friends in a regional vision and strategy. This means being prepared to defend our allies against direct threat, but also finding ways to incentivize economic cooperation so that it maximizes their potential and decreases the influence of countries like Russia and Iran.

The Black Sea should be seen as an economic corridor linking southeast Europe, Turkey, and the Caucasus. It is not just a mission of countering Russia, but of providing a bulwark for the West against Iran, as well.

DJ: How would you assess Turkey’s current role in the Ukraine war?
FBH: Frankly, Turkey is not doing all that it should or could. I say that as a friend, but a friend who has increasing difficulty defending Turkey’s halfway position. The need to maintain diplomatic and trade ties with Russia is understandable. But allowing the export of grain stolen from Ukraine and shipped to Turkey from Sevastopol, on the theory that it is from Crimea and not Ukraine, ignores Ankara’s own view of Russian annexation of Crimea as illegal. Turkish ship trackers see constant questionable traffic between Russian and Turkish ports, and while Ukraine and the world appreciate Turkey’s support to Ukraine, the tolerance of Russian illicit trade undermines Turkey’s standing.

Turkey makes a claim to regional leadership in the Black Sea, but at some point, leadership involves principle, not just pragmatism. Turkish leadership means synching the country’s NATO and regional roles. Enforcing Montreux Convention restrictions on Black Sea entry on Russia as a combatant makes sense, but asking informally for noncombatant NATO allies not to access the Black Sea is not the right kind of leadership

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/con...a-with-lieutenant-general-retired-ben-hodges/

Cant even stay consistent over a couple of minutes, which indicates lying.
 
This is a great place to remember that America has not won a war in about 80 years, with near constant warring. Also that we have spent 25 years wrecking the officer corps.

Well, as we've seen, most warfare in the 21st century is fought in cyberspace.
 
He is senior advisor to Human Rights First, which claims to be non partisan but is lying. They support the WOKE agenda all the way down from what I have seen.

What is the "woke agenda"?

To make you feel guilty for being white?

Why should you feel that way if you identify with abolitionists?

Unless...you don't identify with abolitionists...
 
Serendipstick;

' There is no pandemic.
Trump will win.
The Boeing 737MAX is a safe aircraft.
There is no global warming.
Climate change is a hoax.
Boris Johnson will be back as prime minister.
The Israeli occupation is not illegal.
......................... Russia WILL lose and it will be a catastrophe for Putin. '

They say that the brains of maggots are somewhere in the ass-end.
 
Serendipstick;

' There is no pandemic.
Trump will win.
The Boeing 737MAX is a safe aircraft.
There is no global warming.
Climate change is a hoax.
Boris Johnson will be back as prime minister.
The Israeli occupation is not illegal.
......................... Russia WILL lose and it will be a catastrophe for Putin. '

They say that the brains of maggots are somewhere in the ass-end.

McMoonshi'ite's latest prediction gone down the crapper. Sturgeon will win referendum and take Scotland out of the UK, haw haw, well that didn't happen shit for brains. As always the lying cunt just makes shit up, typical Marxist bullshitter.

There is no pandemic. There wasn't at that stage.

Trump will win. Yep got that wrong, however only because of COVID.

The Boeing 737 MAX is a safe aircraft. It is a very safe aircraft

There is no global warming. Never ever said that, lying fucker

Climate change is a hoax. Again, never ever said that either.

Boris Johnson will be back as prime minister. My personal opinion, we'll see.

The Israeli occupation is not illegal. Doesn't matter if it is or it isn't, possession is 9/10ths of the law.

Russia WILL lose and it will be a catastrophe for Putin. Yep, that's pretty much guaranteed
 
Last edited:
Serendipstick;

' There is no pandemic.
Trump will win.
The Boeing 737MAX is a safe aircraft.
There is no global warming.
Climate change is a hoax.
Boris Johnson will be back as prime minister.
The Israeli occupation is not illegal.
......................... Russia WILL lose and it will be a catastrophe for Putin. '

They say that the brains of maggots are somewhere in the ass-end.

Repeat as above.
 
Back
Top