๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต - ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„

Yakkity Kooter said:
Yes because YOU stared a thread about rush Limbaugh five years after he died you retarded money fucker. Holy fucking shit I didn't know it was possible for you to get more stupid.

1000089012.png
Click to expand...

Awwwwww ..... poor little Kooter.

It's always so difficult for you during "that time of the month", isn't it?

Poor little girlie....
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
:hand:

62% of Americans say they are Christians.
Click to expand...
Argument from randU fallacy. Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for everybody.
ThatOwlWoman said:
A good number of those people vote for (D) candidates. Most of us LWers dislike fundamentalism of any flavor,
Click to expand...
Lie. Your religions are all based on fundamentalism. You believe in the Church of No God, the Church of Global Warming, the Church of Covid, the Church of Green, the Church of the Ozone Hole, and the Church of Hate. ALL of these are fundamentalist style religions.
ThatOwlWoman said:
Islamic or Christian or whatever. It's a favorite tactic of the simple-minded to characterize others as "godless" and "subhuman" in order to justify their hatred, like we see most of this forum's MAGATs doing.
Click to expand...
MAGATs is not a word,
ThatOwlWoman said:
You are right. Morons like LibHATER are incapable of honestly evaluating those they've been taught to hate. They embrace their hate as they reject their Jesus.
Click to expand...
You cannot blame your hate on anybody else.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
True. Like you, he posted drivel. I suggest you get AI to tell you what to reply with.
Click to expand...
From the mouths of morons who get their "facts" from Twitter comes a good idea:

Google AI: why are maga supporters racist and hateful?

The question of whether and why MAGA supporters are "racist and hateful" is a subject of significant debate and sociological study. Different perspectives offer various explanations for the behavior and rhetoric associated with the movement.

Arguments for Systemic or Latent Racism
Many critics and researchers argue that the MAGA movement is rooted in or emboldens racist attitudes:
  • White Grievance and Nationalism: Some analyses suggest the movement is fueled by a sense of "white grievance," where supporters feel that demographic shifts and policies like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) threaten the social status of white Americans.
  • Political Rhetoric: Critics point to the frequent use of "coded language" or overt tropes by leadersโ€”such as comments regarding Mexican immigrants or debunked rumors about Haitian immigrantsโ€”which they argue dehumanize minority groups and energize a base through shared animosity.
  • Data on Attitudes: Some studies by social scientists have found that support for the MAGA agenda is strongly correlated with racist and xenophobic attitudes, which are sometimes used to justify political violence.
  • Validation of Suppressed Views: One perspective is that the movement provides a platform for views that were previously socially suppressed, allowing individuals to openly express white nationalist or exclusionary beliefs under the guise of patriotism.
    Brookings +4

Alternative Perspectives from Supporters and Observers
Supporters and some sociologists argue that labeling the entire movement as racist is an oversimplification:
  • Economic and Class Realignment: Many argue the movement is actually a class-based realignment, with Donald Trump attracting a "multiracial working class" who feel abandoned by elite "college-educated" Democrats.
  • Opposition to "Woke" Policies: Supporters often state they are not against minority groups but against identity politics and equity-based programs (like CRT or affirmative action), which they view as inherently discriminatory against individuals based on merit.
  • Color-Blind Ideals: Some research indicates many supporters sincerely believe in "color-blindness" and only recognize racism when it involves overt hostility, like racial slurs, while dismissing systemic inequality as a non-racial issue.
  • Rejection of the "Racist" Label: Many supporters express intense frustration at being broadly labeled as racists, arguing that their concernsโ€”such as border security or economic policyโ€”are legitimate and not driven by hate.
    The Atlantic +5

Notable Incidents and Divisions
  • Extremist Elements: Reports have highlighted instances of graphic hate speech and white nationalist rhetoric within certain MAGA-aligned groups, which critics say are a feature of the movement rather than an exception.
  • Internal Fractures: Recently, the movement has seen internal conflict over various issues, including the handling of sensitive scandals, suggesting that the base is not a monolith and holds conflicting views on leadership and morality.
 
Nomad said:
Awwwwww ..... poor little Kooter.

It's always so difficult for you during "that time of the month", isn't it?

Poor little girlie....
Click to expand...
Someone has an emotional boo boo.

Rush was always very clear about his motive, to keep people listening as long as possible. You poor idiots are STILL listening and has uttered a word in five years. Guess he was more successful than even he could have imagined. When you're dead no one will even bother to piss on your grave. ๐Ÿคฃ
 
Yakuda said:
Someone has an emotional boo boo.

1000089012.png
Click to expand...
Yeah it's obvious.... YOO DOO!!! ๐Ÿ˜†
Yakuda said:
Rush was always very clear about his motive, to keep people listening as long as possible. You poor idiots are STILL listening and has uttered a word in five years. Guess he was more successful than even he could have imagined. When you're dead no one will even bother to piss on your grave. ๐Ÿคฃ
Click to expand...
Whereas everyone who ever knew you will be lined up for the opportunity to piss on yours.

1000089384.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top