Ruh-roh

Main stream media wouldn't know truth is it smacked them in the face.

What they do understand is falling viewership, failing trust in their reporting, and left wing politics taking a hit because of their lies and bias.

This isn't rocket science, or one would think
 
Main stream media wouldn't know truth is it smacked them in the face.

What they do understand is falling viewership, failing trust in their reporting, and left wing politics taking a hit because of their lies and bias.

This isn't rocket science, or one would think



ITS A CORPORATE MEDIA IDIOT
 
What media narrative of 'mine' are you talking about?

It's not a scapegoat---it's a fact, the media lied about Trump being under investigation for months. You don't think that adversely affected his poll numbers?

Really?

A) Again - his #'s STARTED low. They've gone down, but not much - he was already at historically low levels.
B) People in Trump's campaign were being investigated - only you & other Trump supporters see a significant difference.
C) Trump has brought most of the scrutiny on himself, with his tweets & his careless rhetoric during the campaign & after.
D) It's a scapegoat.
 
A) Again - his #'s STARTED low. They've gone down, but not much - he was already at historically low levels.
B) People in Trump's campaign were being investigated - only you & other Trump supporters see a significant difference.
C) Trump has brought most of the scrutiny on himself, with his tweets & his careless rhetoric during the campaign & after.
D) It's a scapegoat.

It took a minute to come up with B) didn't it lol.
 
Nope. I have never seen a significant difference there. The buck stops w/ Trump.

Hold him to the same standards you held Obama to.

Apparently, the FBI saw a significant difference because they never had Trump under investigation.

Why did the media feel compelled to lie about it? Did they pick sides?
 
When we all find out there is no corruption, no collusion, and it has all been this media driven witch hunt, the damage to the Democrat party will be off the charts.

All that matters is the election polls, I think we all saw how meaningless media polls were in November, no? come on, it's stupid to think otherwise.

If anyone that cares would know, just look at where the House and Senate seats are up for grabs in the mid terms, it will take more than a miracle for Dems to pick up seats, it's almost impossible.

and THAT, THAT is what this collusion witch hunt is about, searching for a miracle.

So grow up, all of you before your own children start laughing at you
 
What inability is that?
surely you jest..

I saw a bit of the Oliver Stone tapes w/Putin -Putin would meet with head of the Duma,
his economic councils, and his National Security Council equivalents..
Russia is a poor country w/gas prices down, but they got things done.

Even privatization - although the corrupted oligarchs got most of the money.
Still that ain't the USSR anymore-far from it.

Compare that to ourselves..It's not our system of government, it's the people in it,
and it's our stupid citizens who tolerate mendacity and mediocrity

Running lackey dogs -all of them- elected and Deep State both
 
When we all find out there is no corruption, no collusion, and it has all been this media driven witch hunt, the damage to the Democrat party will be off the charts.

All that matters is the election polls, I think we all saw how meaningless media polls were in November, no? come on, it's stupid to think otherwise.

If anyone that cares would know, just look at where the House and Senate seats are up for grabs in the mid terms, it will take more than a miracle for Dems to pick up seats, it's almost impossible.

and THAT, THAT is what this collusion witch hunt is about, searching for a miracle.

So grow up, all of you before your own children start laughing at you

It won't hurt the Democrats.

And the Senate is EXTREMELY favorable for the GOP. If they only pick up 2-3 seats there, it's a huge win for Dems.

As for the House, the GOP is going to get shellacked. I'd be surprised at anything less than a '94-type shift in power there.
 
It won't hurt the Democrats.

And the Senate is EXTREMELY favorable for the GOP. If they only pick up 2-3 seats there, it's a huge win for Dems.

As for the House, the GOP is going to get shellacked. I'd be surprised at anything less than a '94-type shift in power there.

What exactly would motivate Democrats to vote for their party, the vagina suit rage?
 
surely you jest..

I saw a bit of the Oliver Stone tapes w/Putin -Putin would meet with head of the Duma,
his economic councils, and his National Security Council equivalents..
Russia is a poor country w/gas prices down, but they got things done.

Even privatization - although the corrupted oligarchs got most of the money.
Still that ain't the USSR anymore-far from it.

Compare that to ourselves..It's not our system of government, it's the people in it,
and it's our stupid citizens who tolerate mendacity and mediocrity

Running lackey dogs -all of them- elected and Deep State both

1) Just because Russian oligarchs "get things done," does not mean it is a self-governing country.
2) That our citizens are capable of having a say in which mediocre leaders are in power is kind of the definition that we are a self-governing society. It is that basis in which some have advocated for fascism over the years.
3) Is the Deep State like the Illuminati?
 
1) Just because Russian oligarchs "get things done," does not mean it is a self-governing country.
2) That our citizens are capable of having a say in which mediocre leaders are in power is kind of the definition that we are a self-governing society. It is that basis in which some have advocated for fascism over the years.
3) Is the Deep State like the Illuminati?

1. No, it means they get things done.
2. They're called elections. You just had one. He won, she lost. Get over it.
3. No idea.
 
1) Just because Russian oligarchs "get things done," does not mean it is a self-governing country.
not the "oligarchs" -Putin..
The oligarchs are their plutocrats -getting things done the same here - but for the same reasoning.
Yes the self govern. One does not need a pure representative democracy.
They have separation of powers,but Putin is a unitary power unto himself
2) That our citizens are capable of having a say in which mediocre leaders are in power is kind of the definition that we are a self-governing society. It is that basis in which some have advocated for fascism over the years.
we have no real say over Congress.we can elect them but we can't make them legislate.
Do you think most Americans want constant gridlock? surely not
Is the Deep State like the Illuminati?
WTF is an illuminati?
 
It won't hurt the Democrats.

And the Senate is EXTREMELY favorable for the GOP. If they only pick up 2-3 seats there, it's a huge win for Dems.

As for the House, the GOP is going to get shellacked. I'd be surprised at anything less than a '94-type shift in power there.

That's about what your State Media masters predicted for Nov. '16. How did that work out for you, Nostradamus :rofl2:

The repubs hardly have any senate seats up for grabs in '18 compared to the dems. At least do your homework before misinforming your fellow dems :palm:
 
Back
Top