are we sure it isn't for Loretta Lynch?.....
Go for it, bitch. Let's see where it leads to your Orange Fuck, shall we?
You good with that?
because that's all they can dig into. The whole sleezy DC affair was supposed to be about "da Russians" and collusion.I find pathetic that the investigation has essentially moved on from collusion, to Trump associates financial dealings.
there is no agreed up limitations to what an SP investigation encompasses.Good grief, some poster's position are unbelievable, investigations into one possible crime can lead to discovery of other possible crimes. The special prosecutor can not ignore other possible crimes, just boggles the mind people don't understand how investigations work.
Can I have a bite of that nothing burger, I've never tasted one
because that's all they can dig into. The whole sleezy DC affair was supposed to be about "da Russians" and collusion.
It's patently obvious that's a dry hole -so Mueller sleezes off to more fertile grounds
How could you possibly know or even begin to understand how evidence found in one area might lead to evidence in another?
Uncovering the details of Trump's financial dealings in Russia could easily lead to finding evidence and motive for collusion during the election.
You have no idea where anything they find might lead to.
The SP mandate was Russian interference/collusion and whether Trump obstructed justice with the word 'hope'.
Anything beyond that is an Inquisition/Witch Hunt and could easily be challenged, constitutionally. But since Sessions' knee-jerk recused himself he can't file a challenge in court.
Gotta love the Swamp.
how would you like to write up a bill of particulars in response? good luck with that.How could you possibly know or even begin to understand how evidence found in one area might lead to evidence in another?
Uncovering the details of Trump's financial dealings in Russia could easily lead to finding evidence and motive for collusion during the election.
You have no idea where anything they find might lead to.
how would you like to write up a bill of particulars in response? good luck with that.
It's way too wide-deep power
Any familiar with Watergate knows this, remember Spiro Agnew!How could you possibly know or even begin to understand how evidence found in one area might lead to evidence in another?
Uncovering the details of Trump's financial dealings in Russia could easily lead to finding evidence and motive for collusion during the election.
You have no idea where anything they find might lead to.
the angrier and more vile you get the more those of whom you aim it at realize they are WINNING !!!
One and the same, idiot.
Yes you are. One and the same idiot.
They certainly know how fishing expeditions work.Good grief, some poster's position are unbelievable, investigations into one possible crime can lead to discovery of other possible crimes. The special prosecutor can not ignore other possible crimes, just boggles the mind people don't understand how investigations work.
In like Flynn!Rumored it's for Flynn