Conservatives have nothing to cheer about now that Brett Kavanaugh joined John Roberts on his first big case involving tax dollars.
I never saw the bloom come off the rose faster that it faded on Bret Kavanaugh. It only took 66 days for Kavanaugh to wilt faster than the last rose of summer.
. . . I saw this one coming. [As did I.]
When President Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, I knew it was at least a very risky pick.
But he won the hearts of conservatives because of the insanity of the opposition.
Now we know, for certain, that Brett Kavanaugh is a fraud. He should never have been President Trump’s first choice. He’s a weakling. He buckled to the extreme left to salvage his own reputation. I had a bad feeling about this guy – ever since his role in the Vincent Foster cover-up and his tutelage by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr.
How many times do we have to see this kind of betrayal by Republican nominees of Supreme Court justices – Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts?
The Kavanaugh betrayal!
Newly seated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s progressive wing on Monday in declining to review three cases centered on Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood at the state level.
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas accused the majority of “abdicating” its duty for political reasons.
“So what explains the Court’s refusal to do its job here?” Thomas wrote. “I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.'”
Thomas asserted that a “tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty.”
“If anything, neutrally applying the law is all the more important when political issues are in the background,” he wrote.
Kavanaugh sides with liberals in Planned Parenthood case
If I had my druthers I would impeach Chief Justice John Roberts for legitimating the ACA when he turned it into a constitutional tax. Naturally, Republicans would never impeach one of their own, nor would Democrats go along. Libs expect more good things from Roberts if he becomes the swing vote for Democrats.
This next one was not decided by the Nifty Nine, but it strengthens my impeach-Roberts suggestion:
And that begs the question: What do the FISC judges and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, the ultimate judicial disciplinarian, think about what happened?
For those reasons, the silence of the FISC and Chief Justice Roberts is deafening. Enough concern has been raised about the Russia case for the judiciary to offer us an explanation.
Silence of 'the lambs': The deafening quietude of the FISA court and John Roberts
By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 10/30/18 04:30 PM EDT
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...deafening-quietude-of-the-fisa-court-and-john
Supreme Court justices are creatures of the federal government; so predicting the outcome of Supreme Court cases involving tax dollars, and/or Wall Street’s income, is a walk in the park. No Supreme Court will ever decide to reduce or eliminate federal government revenues. In short: Repealing the ACA did not stand a chance when it got to the High Court.
Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.
Roberts must have been talking about midgets when he said this at his confirmation hearing:
“If the Constitution says that the little guy should win, then the little guy's going to win in the court before me, but if the Constitution says that the big guy should win, well then the big guy's going to win because my obligation is to the Constitution.”
Roberts clearly voted for the big guy —— the federal government —— when he abandoned the Constitution in order to save Hillarycare II because every decision involving income tax revenues must go against the little guy.
When more horror stories about patient abuse and bureaucratic death panels surface in the years ahead you can blame one man —— John Roberts. He is the one and only individual who could have repealed the ACA before it took hold.
Finally, John Roberts only followed through on his ACA “constitutional tax” when he voted to continue funding Planned Parenthood’s butcher shops. To no one’s surprise, Kavanaugh replacing Anthony Kennedy amounted to business as usual.
Bottom line: Five isobilateral Supreme Court justices ruled for the parasite class —— not healthcare —— when they upheld the ACA and Planned Parenthood funding. Repealing the ACA and driving Planned Parenthood away from the public trough would have set precedents tax dollar parasites would never allow.
If not money, the Lord only knows what form of payment faux strict constructionists John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh received.
I never saw the bloom come off the rose faster that it faded on Bret Kavanaugh. It only took 66 days for Kavanaugh to wilt faster than the last rose of summer.
. . . I saw this one coming. [As did I.]
When President Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, I knew it was at least a very risky pick.
But he won the hearts of conservatives because of the insanity of the opposition.
Now we know, for certain, that Brett Kavanaugh is a fraud. He should never have been President Trump’s first choice. He’s a weakling. He buckled to the extreme left to salvage his own reputation. I had a bad feeling about this guy – ever since his role in the Vincent Foster cover-up and his tutelage by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr.
How many times do we have to see this kind of betrayal by Republican nominees of Supreme Court justices – Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts?
The Kavanaugh betrayal!
Posted By Joseph Farah On 12/10/2018 @ 7:29 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/the-kavanaugh-betrayal/
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/the-kavanaugh-betrayal/
XXXXX
Newly seated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s progressive wing on Monday in declining to review three cases centered on Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood at the state level.
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas accused the majority of “abdicating” its duty for political reasons.
“So what explains the Court’s refusal to do its job here?” Thomas wrote. “I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.'”
Thomas asserted that a “tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty.”
“If anything, neutrally applying the law is all the more important when political issues are in the background,” he wrote.
Kavanaugh sides with liberals in Planned Parenthood case
Posted By Art Moore On 12/10/2018 @ 2:17 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/kavanaugh-sides-with-liberals-in-planned-parenthood-case/
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/kavanaugh-sides-with-liberals-in-planned-parenthood-case/
If I had my druthers I would impeach Chief Justice John Roberts for legitimating the ACA when he turned it into a constitutional tax. Naturally, Republicans would never impeach one of their own, nor would Democrats go along. Libs expect more good things from Roberts if he becomes the swing vote for Democrats.
This next one was not decided by the Nifty Nine, but it strengthens my impeach-Roberts suggestion:
And that begs the question: What do the FISC judges and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, the ultimate judicial disciplinarian, think about what happened?
XXXXX
For those reasons, the silence of the FISC and Chief Justice Roberts is deafening. Enough concern has been raised about the Russia case for the judiciary to offer us an explanation.
Silence of 'the lambs': The deafening quietude of the FISA court and John Roberts
By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 10/30/18 04:30 PM EDT
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...deafening-quietude-of-the-fisa-court-and-john
Supreme Court justices are creatures of the federal government; so predicting the outcome of Supreme Court cases involving tax dollars, and/or Wall Street’s income, is a walk in the park. No Supreme Court will ever decide to reduce or eliminate federal government revenues. In short: Repealing the ACA did not stand a chance when it got to the High Court.
Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.
Roberts must have been talking about midgets when he said this at his confirmation hearing:
“If the Constitution says that the little guy should win, then the little guy's going to win in the court before me, but if the Constitution says that the big guy should win, well then the big guy's going to win because my obligation is to the Constitution.”
Roberts clearly voted for the big guy —— the federal government —— when he abandoned the Constitution in order to save Hillarycare II because every decision involving income tax revenues must go against the little guy.
When more horror stories about patient abuse and bureaucratic death panels surface in the years ahead you can blame one man —— John Roberts. He is the one and only individual who could have repealed the ACA before it took hold.
Finally, John Roberts only followed through on his ACA “constitutional tax” when he voted to continue funding Planned Parenthood’s butcher shops. To no one’s surprise, Kavanaugh replacing Anthony Kennedy amounted to business as usual.
Bottom line: Five isobilateral Supreme Court justices ruled for the parasite class —— not healthcare —— when they upheld the ACA and Planned Parenthood funding. Repealing the ACA and driving Planned Parenthood away from the public trough would have set precedents tax dollar parasites would never allow.
If not money, the Lord only knows what form of payment faux strict constructionists John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh received.
