The understatement of the year.
Ron Johnson: Jan. 6 narrative will continue to morph as more security footage emerges
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
The understatement of the year.
Interesting how many conspiracies have become true.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Such as?
We can start with the China virus leak.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Okay. Start w/ it.
His attorney did have access to all those videos.
It's too bad Carlson didn't play the ones that the prosecutors used to show his illegal actions that got him put in jail.
Low confidence is STILL an affirmative statement -im pretty sure the "low confidence" means because there is no access to source material (China)
Analytic confidence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_confidence
In an effort to apply more rigorous standards to National Intelligence Estimates, the National Intelligence Council includes explanations of the three levels of analytic confidence made in estimative statements.[1]
High confidence generally indicates judgments based on high-quality information, and/or the nature of the issue makes it possible to render a solid judgment. A “high confidence” judgment is not a fact or a certainty, however, and still carries a risk of being wrong.[1]
Moderate confidence generally means credibly sourced and plausible information, but not of sufficient quality or corroboration to warrant a higher level of confidence.[1]
Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed.[1]
Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed.[1]
That seems to your usual MO when it comes to "truth."
He most assuredly is that much of an asshole.
ALL OF THE PEOPLE still trying to make that disgusting assault on the Capitol seem insignificant...ALL OF THEM...are assholes.
Yes, that...and he is an asshole like the people attempting to make the assault seem insignificant.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
And you were the guy who said storm the bastille on Jan 6th
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?158255-Storm-the-Bastille
dukkha dukkha is offline
Verified User
Join Date
Jul 2017
Posts
43,440
Thanks
12,556
Thanked 23,745 Times in 16,556 PostsGroans249Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts
Default Storm the Bastille
BLM/ANTIFA rioted all summer for their political reasons.
we storm the Peoples House - and LW goes nuts, while accepting ANTIFA/BLM
riots as needed for WTF reasons
our institutions are ossified, corrupt and non-responsive.
Court refuse to hear for standing or because not "dispositive"
Secretary of State usurp Constitutional authority,backed by partisan state supreme courts
They've had enough, and this is popular redress because they have no other recourse.
I certainly understand the frustration of not being heard - well they hear it now
His attorney was on Carlson's show last night and stated he had not seen any of those videos.
All, of America, saw those actions that got him put in jail.
The point being, guilty or not all the evidence was not presented.
so you decided to MAKE BIG LETTERS instead of understanding Analytic confidence?
I even nicely clued you in, then you farted loudly and stuck your head back in the sand.
Low Confidence is an affirmative - the sourcing isnt available.. now add in the FBI
I'm sorry, I do not have time to dance with you. You refuse to watch the entire March 6 show so there is no further point in discussing this topic with you. Interesting how alt-lefties like yourself refuse to at least open their minds for a few seconds when something that opposes their spoon-fed information is challenged with video proof.
The entire set of videos will be presented and after you have watched all 41,000 hours, get back to me. Until then, see ya.
Good luck with that argument in a court of law. It isn't going to help him at all and no judge will see the video as exculpatory enough to override the video of him on the dias in the Senate refusing to exit it when told by police to do so.
You have no clues to clue anyone in since you completely ignored everything about what low confidence means. It means that they don't have enough information to make a claim with confidence.
I never said it would exonerate him or excuse his actions. I am saying the charged should have ALL the available evidence presented. I am not defending or excusing buffalo man, I am just shocked at what was presented on Carlson's show and the meltdown by the lefties over having their editing exposed.
Easy to wager 95% of the lefties on this board did not watch one minute of the unseen videos which is sad. I don't think it would change their minds because of the festering hatred of Donald Trump but they emparass themselves when they comment on this topic.
ROFLMAO. Since the prosecution didn't present any evidence, it would be impossible for the attorney to not have ALL the evidence presented.
Chansley plead guilty to one count to get most of the charges dropped. Getting his conviction thrown out brings back all the other criminal charges.