Ron DeSantis says he will ‘destroy leftism’ in US if elected president

Oh,....then who's on first. :cool:

Indeed.

Got a single to lead off.



image-asset.jpeg
 
What would these far left Democratic Socialist loons be doing if conservatives had taken control of universities and primary schools and were indoctrinating them and censoring them?

They would be rioting...anarchy.

Censorship of the right or left is dead wrong. What is the left afraid of?

They are afraid of the sunshine of truth shining on their perverted, failed Socialist and Marxist ideology.
 
Predicting two terms in the White House should he defeat Donald Trump for the Republican presidential nomination next year, Ron DeSantis said he would go on to “destroy leftism in this country”.

“I will be able to destroy leftism in this country and leave woke ideology in the dustbin of history,” the Florida governor told Fox News.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/30/ron-desantis-fox-news-interview-destroy-leftism

If that does not sound like an Adolf Hitler I don't know what does. Just replace the Jews with those with a leftist ideaology and you have the same guy. He has already started burning books and persecuting those who don't share his ideals. If he wins do you suppose many on the left will begin migrating out of the country before he starts with the trains and concentration camps?
 
I have to say that's extremely unlikely but it's a great goal. Leftists are insane and when insane people are pushed they do inane things. Leftism will have to be neutralized with common sense and logic. The best place to start the process would be to get rid of leftism in the education system in America.

Lots of ignorant swallowed that shit in the 1930's too, they were called Nazi's, Heil Hitler!
 
Not as stupid as you apparently. It's quite clear that leftism has been a cancer on this country. It should be eradicated in all haste but it won't happen by fiat. Eradicating leftist fundamentalism from schools is how we root out.

Heil Hitler!
t5610118-198-thumb-Smilie_hitler.png
 
DeSantis will set up concentration camps for Lefties, place any white kids under 12 with "decent" families and imprison the rest.

He'll put the Lefties, the woke and anyone who doesn't salute his regime to work building a wall around the US. Any who dies will be left to rot on the outside of the wall.

7nn71h.jpg

t5610118-198-thumb-Smilie_hitler.png
 
DeSantis supports freedom of speech on America's campuses.

That distresses you - if you can't silence Americans, dangerous ideas like liberty and decency might threaten your Reich.

Someone who supports free speech does not pass laws banning books he does not like.
 
RDS is the picture perfect candidate for the most part. He follows Trump and Biden. Perfect setup. Most people actually LIKE Trumps policies but many cannot stand trump himself. RDS will have the same policies but without all the baggage that comes with Trump. WIN WIN. He will also be directly following a wildly unpopular duo of an epic loser like dementia Joe and the nasty old Ho Kamala. Again....WIN WIN. Now,....add in a guy like the very popular Tim Scott as VP who not only is an excellent candidate all on his own but will actually appease at least some of the nasty race baiters out there on the left. The rest of the racists will be exposed as what THEY ARE when they are dumb enuff to attack him as an Uncle Tim. Yes,....you read that right,....those assholes will dub him Uncle Tim as a word play on Uncle Tom.

EPIC WIN!!!!!!!

:evilnod:


:cheers:
 
I wanted to give you a heads up about a recent law that has passed our legislature, SB 266, which goes into effect on July 1. For those of you who haven't followed the details, this law intervenes in higher education in a variety of ways that impact us, and I am happy to discuss any of this in more detail in person or over the phone/zoom. If anyone is interested, I can ask someone from the Counsel's office to attend our retreat to share their perspective on this with us.

Chairs met with some of the university lawyers earlier this week, and they pointed out some of the sections of the law that might be important for us.

While I would recommend that you familiarize yourself with the entire law, if you are teaching general education, you may want to attend to the section on general education that begins on line 528, with special attention to section c (line 556-561) and D2 (lines 567-571). I'm not sending this on because I anticipate problems, but simply for you to be aware of.

Section c: "(c) General education core courses may not distort significant historical events or include a curriculum that teaches identity politics, violates s. 1000.05, or is based on theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political, and economic inequities."

https://leiterreports.typepad.com/b...iss-war-on-higher-educationon-the-ground.html

Raising the question what exactly is meant by "General education core courses"? A junior or senior year course in "African American Studies", for example, would seem to be outside this category. A general history course would be able to take up the obvious existence of racism without identifying it as "inherent in the institutions of the United States", raising the question how would and could it be identified. Racism was obviously inherent in the institutions of Southern states in the Civil War era. The governments of those states even proudly claimed it as such. So does this mean a general American history course would be unable to teach students the South Carolina "Declaration of Secession"?
 
Raising the question what exactly is meant by "General education core courses"? A junior or senior year course in "African American Studies", for example, would seem to be outside this category. A general history course would be able to take up the obvious existence of racism without identifying it as "inherent in the institutions of the United States", raising the question how would and could it be identified. Racism was obviously inherent in the institutions of Southern states in the Civil War era. The governments of those states even proudly claimed it as such. So does this mean a general American history course would be unable to teach students the South Carolina "Declaration of Secession"?

An administration of RDS/Scott will address racism and other issues regardless of race through a booming economy that will provide jobs for the jobless. Only those unwilling to work or too sick or disabled will be without jobs. The rest WILL work or face the consequences. Jobs for all......a productive America is a GREAT America.

Time to get TO WORK. Have a GREAT day all.............:)
 
Raising the question what exactly is meant by "General education core courses"? A junior or senior year course in "African American Studies", for example, would seem to be outside this category. A general history course would be able to take up the obvious existence of racism without identifying it as "inherent in the institutions of the United States", raising the question how would and could it be identified. Racism was obviously inherent in the institutions of Southern states in the Civil War era. The governments of those states even proudly claimed it as such. So does this mean a general American history course would be unable to teach students the South Carolina "Declaration of Secession"?

This is what the law says is included:

Section c: "(c) General education core courses may not distort significant historical events or include a curriculum that teaches identity politics, violates s. 1000.05, or is based on theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political, and economic inequities."

It’s is written in language that is clear enough that even you can understand it, Marty.
 
This is what the law says is included:

Section c: "(c) General education core courses may not distort significant historical events or include a curriculum that teaches identity politics, violates s. 1000.05, or is based on theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political, and economic inequities."

It’s is written in language that is clear enough that even you can understand it, Marty.

If I didn't understand it, dumbo, I wouldn't have put up that comment. The South Carolina Legislature, probably in sympathy with much of today's Florida legislature, expressly stated "Negroes" were an inferior race that benefited from white slavery. This was, in fact, a prevailing opinion in Southern white culture and a rationale in Southern legal systems. The Florida rule seems to prohibit public colleges and universities from teaching it.
 
Last edited:
Someone who supports free speech does not pass laws banning books he does not like.

Oh look, another lying Nazi fuck.

Okay Nazi, name a single book DeSantis has "banned?"

I know, you're lying for your Reich - you shouldn't be expected to support the lies...
 
If I didn't understand it, dumbo, I wouldn't have put up that comment. The South Carolina Legislature, probably in sympathy with much of today's Florida legislature, expressly stated "Negroes" were an inferior race that benefited from white slavery. This was, in fact, a prevailing opinion in Southern white culture and a rationale in Southern legal systems. The Florida rule seems to prohibit public colleges and universities from teaching it.

What year was that, in which YOU DEMOCRATS in the South Carolina Legislature said this?
 
What year was that, in which YOU DEMOCRATS in the South Carolina Legislature said this?

If you don't know when the Civil War started you don't belong in a political discussion forum. Same can be said if you think the racism of the elected government was not shared by voters and the public at large or if you didn't know the Republican Party was formed in the 1850's as a progressive alternative but in the 20th Century lost that mantle to Democrats and became the regressive party.
 
Well, I can spot political speak when I see it, but if he’ll just point it out for what it is and stand against the extremes of it when the opportunity arises I’ll be satisfied with his efforts.
 
Back
Top