Romney: "Middle Income" Means $200,000 - $250,000

Of course I can. Your sanctimony permeates everything you say. It's nauseating.

Sorry, but I see nothing 'sanctimonious' about pointing out liberal hypocrisy. I don't doubt that hearing the raw truth makes your stomach get queasy, it must really suck to be slapped in the face with the truth and not have a response for it. You know, most of us take this as a sign we might want to examine what we believe, and possibly change our viewpoint. But I guess, when you've sold your soul to liberalism, stuff like this can be called 'sanctimonious' when it's really not. ...Tummy feel better now, pinhead?
 
Sorry, but I see nothing 'sanctimonious' about pointing out liberal hypocrisy. I don't doubt that hearing the raw truth makes your stomach get queasy, it must really suck to be slapped in the face with the truth and not have a response for it. You know, most of us take this as a sign we might want to examine what we believe, and possibly change our viewpoint. But I guess, when you've sold your soul to liberalism, stuff like this can be called 'sanctimonious' when it's really not. ...Tummy feel better now, pinhead?

I didn't ask for your opinion, rube. I don't need for you to *approve* of my opinion, nor do your observations about 'liberals' carry any weight here because you're an arrogant blowhard.
 
It's not a human life. It's a rubber model that's not physically accurate.

Well if it's a chunk of rubber, what is disgusting about that? And yes, it IS physically accurate. The only thing that could be questioned is the skin of an actual fetus would be more translucent, and it would have an umbilical cord, but size and detail are certainly in accordance with modern medical journals, illustrations and ultrasounds. I'm sorry if it doesn't look like a more meaningless clump of cells, or insignificant tumorous growth. I know that must be disturbing that you support the exterminating of something this precious, it's probably the reason you find it so disgusting.
 
I think this thread is revealing of who the liberals really are and what they really think. The meme for the past several years has been centered around the class warfare rhetoric of; those who have too much, against those who don't have enough. In this debate, liberals defined those who "had more than they deserve" as being incomes above $250k, and later, Obama would sometimes edge that down to $200k, depending on the crowd. We could be reasonably sure, however, that people making under $200k at least, were 'deserving' of what they earned, and not "millionaires and billionaires" you sought to punish with higher taxation. But much to the surprise of many, we now see that you don't really think $200k is a good point to start considering someone "rich" and it has been articulated in this thread, that might be as low as $100k, or maybe even $80k. Why don't you just be honest and admit, anyone who is making a decent living and not residing in their mom's basement or a tent in some makeshift protest city, is probably "rich" by your definitions? I mean, a $60,000 annual income, that's pretty sweet, isn't it? I'm sure people who make $30k a year would LOVE to be making $60k, but they just haven't won life's lottery yet, they are among the unfortunate. And when you get right down to it, someone who makes $30k a year, well... they have SO much more than someone who's making $14k! Life just ins't fair, that some have more than they need while others suffer!

Not only has this new 'revelation' proven that class warfare is ridiculous, but it also proves you're all a bunch of liars who don't mean or believe a damn thing you say. What you seek, is to brainwash people into accepting your premise, that people who make more than you personally, are making more than they deserve, more than their fair share, and we must punish them for success. Where DOES "the rich" start, and "middle class" end? It was supposed to be as Romney said, between $200-$250k, but now the curtain has been pulled back, and we find, that's not really what you believe at all, the "rich" can actually be people who are making much less. I say BRAVO to the class warriors, this is exactly what THINKING people need to hear and see!

Just for the record, and for the Johnny come lately's; This thread has now been diverted by the resident liberal pinheads to discuss my 'disgusting' avatar, and not talk about the validity of the point I brilliantly made above. Immediately following this epic smackdown, they organized an 'escape plan' and have now successfully changed the topic away from what they don't want to discuss.
 
Just for the record, and for the Johnny come lately's; This thread has now been diverted by the resident liberal pinheads to discuss my 'disgusting' avatar, and not talk about the validity of the point I brilliantly made above. Immediately following this epic smackdown, they organized an 'escape plan' and have now successfully changed the topic away from what they don't want to discuss.

Wrong again, rube. The previous five pages laid utter waste to the silly notion that 200k is 'middle class'. No need to belabour the obvious for anyone but the hopelessly stupid.
 
This is cool. I don't have to see Dicks avatar, don't have to read his bullshit and can watch Bijou devastate him. Could easily become a permanent situation.
 
Back
Top