Romney's has claimed that he has a plan to create 12 million jobs thusly:
Turns out that the studies that his campaign relies on in support of those claims don't support it. I'll write that again. The studies that the Romney relies upon in support of the 12 million jobs claim do not support it. Here's the run down:
The man is utterly and completely full of shit and will say practically anything regardless of how untrue or ridiculous to become President of the United States.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...d1d1e1c-170f-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_blog.html
Let me tell you how I will create 12 million jobs when President Obama couldn't. First, my energy independence policy means more than 3 million new jobs, many of them in manufacturing. My tax reform plan to lower rates for the middle class and for small business creates 7 million more. And expanding trade, cracking down on China and improving job training takes us to over 12 million new jobs.
Turns out that the studies that his campaign relies on in support of those claims don't support it. I'll write that again. The studies that the Romney relies upon in support of the 12 million jobs claim do not support it. Here's the run down:
For instance, the claim that 7 million jobs would be created from Romney’s tax plan is a 10-year number, derived from a study written by John W. Diamond, a professor at Rice University.
For instance, the 3-million-jobs claim for Romney’s energy policies appears largely based on a Citigroup Global Markets study that did not even evaluate Romney’s policies. Instead, the report predicted 2.7 million to 3.6 million jobs would be created over the next eight years, largely because of trends and policies already adopted — including tougher fuel efficiency standards that Romney has criticized and suggested he would reverse.
The 2-million-jobs claim from cracking down on China is also very suspicious.
This figure comes from a 2011 International Trade Commission report, which estimated that there could be a gain of 2.1 million jobs if China stopped infringing on U.S. intellectual property rights. The estimate is highly conditional and pegged to the job market in 2011, when there was high unemployment. “It is unclear when China might implement the improvement in IPR protection envisioned in the analysis, and equally unclear whether the United States will face as much excess labor supply then as it does today,” the report says.
The man is utterly and completely full of shit and will say practically anything regardless of how untrue or ridiculous to become President of the United States.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...d1d1e1c-170f-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_blog.html