Garbage.
"The rest of it — the sweeping cuts to federal spending, the clampdown on bailouts, the rollback of Roe v. Wade — will die on the vine as one Tea Party leader after another gets seduced by the Republican Party and retrained for the revolutionary cause of voting down taxes for Goldman Sachs executives. It's all on display here in Kentucky, the unofficial capital of the Tea Party movement, where, ha, ha, the joke turns out to be on them: Rand Paul, their hero, is a fake."
Teabaggers are the biggest dupes ever. They think it's grassroots thinking when all the while their leaders will vote against their best interest and for the same conservative bullshit that outsourced their jobs and caused the problems we're in.
Side note two: It was CLINTON that repealed Glass Steagall
Its the truth - SUCKS TO BE YOU!
I don't trust the Tea Partiers, and think many of them are morons. That was just a crappy article filled with ad homs and poor journalism.
"The rest of it — the sweeping cuts to federal spending, the clampdown on bailouts, the rollback of Roe v. Wade — will die on the vine as one Tea Party leader after another gets seduced by the Republican Party and retrained for the revolutionary cause of voting down taxes for Goldman Sachs executives. It's all on display here in Kentucky, the unofficial capital of the Tea Party movement, where, ha, ha, the joke turns out to be on them: Rand Paul, their hero, is a fake."
Teabaggers are the biggest dupes ever. They think it's grassroots thinking when all the while their leaders will vote against their best interest and for the same conservative bullshit that outsourced their jobs and caused the problems we're in.
I don't trust the Tea Partiers, and think many of them are morons. That was just a crappy article filled with ad homs and poor journalism.
It is the Rolling Stone, it was funny.
yeah, but even Rolling Stone typically avoids printing such crap. They are obviously biased towards the left, but normally their articles are at least well written.
What was wrong with the way the article was written? It was pretty much standard Matt Taibbi. Now, you may or may not like his work and you can disagree with the substance of this one, but I don't think it's fair to call him a shitty writer or to call that a poorly written article.
I did not state he was a shitty writer Mr Emotional.
I stated it was a poorly written article... which it was.
What was wrong with the way the article was written? It was pretty much standard Matt Taibbi. Now, you may or may not like his work and you can disagree with the substance of this one, but I don't think it's fair to call him a shitty writer or to call that a poorly written article.